U.S. Department of Transportation
Federal Highway Administration
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Washington, DC 20590
PDF [2.28 MB]
This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the U.S. Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The U.S. Government assumes no liability for the use of the information contained in this document.
The U.S. Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trademarks or manufacturers' names appear in this report only because they are considered essential to the objective of the document.
Quality Assurance Statement
The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) provides high-quality information to serve Government, industry, and the public in a manner that promotes public understanding. Standards and policies are used to ensure and maximize the quality, objectivity, utility, and integrity of its information. FHWA periodically reviews quality issues and adjusts its programs and processes to ensure continuous quality improvement.
1. Report No. FHWA
2. Government Accession No.
3. Recipient’s Catalog No.
4. Title and Subtitle
A Focused Approach to Safety Guidebook
5. Report Date
6. Performing Organization Code
Michael Sawyer, Rebecca Fiedler, Dan Nabors, Hugh McGee, Jeffrey Miller, Melonie Barrington
8. Performing Organization Report No.
9. Performing Organization Name and Address
Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc. (VHB)
10. Work Unit No.
11. Contract or Grant No.
12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address
Federal Highway Administration Office of Safety
13. Type of Report and Period Covered
14. Sponsoring Agency Code
15. Supplementary Notes:
The contract manager for this project was Jeffrey Miller with support from Melonie Barrington.
The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) has developed the Focused Approach to Safety in order to better address the most critical safety challenges by devoting additional attention to high priority States. The purpose of the Focused Approach is to further decrease the number of fatalities and serious injuries on the Nation’s highways through a more targeted delivery of technical assistance and resources. FHWA’s safety focus also calls for the transportation community to think beyond traditional approaches and to consider low-cost, comprehensive, systematic safety solutions. This approach allows focus States to demonstrate dramatic results and to take advantage of the lessons learned across the country from States and localities that have shown safety improvements on their highways.This guidebook provides a concise resource for safety stakeholders to utilize. It outlines the program’s purpose, benefits, and history. It summarizes the methodology for how a State becomes eligible to participate, as well as the basic steps for success. Finally, it provides an overview of each of the focus areas (Intersections, Pedestrians, and Roadway Departure) with success stories and resources to fully engage each focus State in developing and implementing proven countermeasures. Highway safety requires a comprehensive, focused approach to deliver results.
17. Key Words
Focused approach, safety, roadway departure, intersections, pedestrians
18. Distribution Statement
19. Security Classif. (of this report)
20. Security Classif. (of this page)
21. No. of Pages:
Form DOT F 1700.7 (8-72) - Reproduction of completed pages authorized
|CMF||Crash Modification Factor|
|DOT||Department of Transportation|
|ELCSI-PFS||of Low-Cost Safety Improvements Pooled Fund Study|
|EMS||Emergency Medical Services|
|FARS||Fatality Analysis Reporting System|
|FHWA||Federal Highway Administration|
|HELPERS||Hazard Elimination Local Project for Roads and Streets|
|HPMS||Highway Performance Monitoring System|
|HSIP||Highway Safety Improvement Program|
|ISIP||Intersection Safety Implementation Plan|
|LPA||Local Public Agency|
|MPO||Metropolitan Planning Organization|
|NHI||National Highway Institute|
|RSA||Road Safety Audit|
|SAFETEA-LU||The Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users|
|SHSP||Strategic Highway Safety Plan|
|TZD||Toward Zero Deaths|
|VMT||Vehicle Miles Traveled|
The authors would like to thank the members of the Federal Highway Administration’s Focused Approach to Safety Technical Working Group listed below for their participation, advice, and guidance. The extraordinary sense of duty to address highway safety challenges across the country coupled with the overwhelming pride and professionalism of the FHWA make this signature program special. This guidebook puts people first; it will take many people working together to save lives and prevent serious injuries on our Nation’s roadways.
A special thank you to the authors of the resources cited, as well as the State and local contacts who provided their input to make this guidebook possible. Finally, special recognition is given to the State Departments of Transportation that have been a part of the Focused Approach since its inception in 2004, and congratulations on the progress made towards achieving their safety goals.
The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) has developed the Focused Approach to Safety in order to better address the most critical safety challenges by devoting additional attention to high-priority States. The purpose of the Focused Approach is to further decrease the number of fatalities and serious injuries on the Nation’s highways through a more targeted delivery of technical assistance and resources. FHWA’s safety focus also calls for the transportation community to think beyond traditional approaches by considering low-cost, comprehensive, systematic safety solutions. This approach allows focus States to achieve dramatic results and to take advantage of the lessons learned across the country from States and localities that have demonstrated safety improvements on their highways.
This guidebook provides a concise resource for safety stakeholders. It describes the Focused Approach to Safety’s purpose, benefits, and history. It also describes the methodology for how a State becomes eligible to participate, as well as the basic steps for success. Finally, it provides an overview of the three focus areas —Roadway Departure, Intersections, and Pedestrians — with success stories and resources to fully engage each focus State in developing and implementing proven countermeasures. Included in the Appendix of the guidebook is the Focused Approach to Safety Toolbox, which provides links to additional safety resources.
The Focused Approach provides several benefits that apply to all States. The program:
Focus States will realize several benefits from the Focused Approach. The program:
The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) has developed the Focused Approach to Safety in order to better address the most critical safety challenges by devoting additional attention to high-priority States. The purpose of the Focused Approach is to further decrease the number of fatalities and serious injuries on the Nation’s highways through a more targeted delivery of technical assistance and resources. FHWA’s safety focus also calls for the transportation community to think beyond traditional approaches by considering low-cost, comprehensive, systemic safety solutions. This approach allows focus States to achieve dramatic results and to take advantage of the lessons learned across the country from States and localities that have demonstrated safety improvements on their highways.
Developing and delivering tools and technologies where they will have the greatest impact are paramount to the success of a safety program. Using the 4 E’s of highway safety (engineering, enforcement, education, and emergency services), FHWA will continue to concentrate resources on the three focus areas in which the greatest percentage of highway fatalities occur:
The objective of the Focused Approach to Safety is to provide resources (i.e., people, time, tools, and training) where they are needed the most. A focus State participates in the Focused Approach areas after meeting the eligibility criteria in one or more of the safety focus areas. A focus State receives additional resources to help achieve its Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) fatality goals in eligible focus areas. A tailored approach is used to meet the needs of the focus State.
The following sections describe the overall benefits of the Focused Approach, as well as the benefits of the program to individual States.
The Focused Approach to Safety offers the following overall benefits to address the safety improvement needs of focus States and of our national roadway system as a whole:
In addition to overall benefits, the Focused Approach to Safety also offers the following direct benefits to the focus States:
In 2005, the President signed into law the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU), which guaranteed funding to make significant progress in reducing highway fatalities. SAFETEA-LU raised the stature of the highway safety programs by establishing highway safety improvement as a core program tied to strategic safety planning and performance (7). In the same year, FHWA launched the Focused Approach to Safety to better direct national resources where there is greatest opportunity to save lives and prevent serious injuries. The Focused Approach is a unique data-driven and State-specific approach to safety. Since the start of the program in 2005, 36 States have participated in the Focused Approach. Studies show a 12 to 19 percent reduction in fatalities in focus States areas from 2002 to 2008 (8).
FHWA partnered with the Volpe Center in 2010 to complete an evaluation of the Focused Approach. According to the Volpe findings, it is still too early in the program to fully evaluate the success, as plans in each focus State are at various stages of implementation; however, they did recommend continuing the program. The report states that the availability and application of Focused Approach resources enabled many of the States to reduce severe crashes in the three focus areas. FHWA followed that report with further analysis, consideration, and redesign. The findings have been considered in the enhancements to the Focused Approach. In 2011, FHWA enhanced the design of the Focused Approach to better meet the needs of the focus States. These changes and highlights include the following:
The criteria and methodology for determining focus State eligibility were revised in 2011. Each focus area has its own data-driven process for determining eligibility. In general, eligibility is based on States with the greatest potential for safety improvement. States who meet the eligibility criteria are invited by FHWA to participate in the Focused Approach. All eligibility criteria use a three-year average of the most recent available state and national fatality data. At the time of publication of this document, data analysis was based on 2007-2009 FARS and HPMS data.
States are eligible to be Roadway Departure States based on their number of roadway departure fatalities and the fatality rate per centerline mile and per vehicle miles traveled (VMT) over a three-year period. Based on these criteria, States are eligible to be Roadway Departure Focus States if they did one of the following: 1) annually averaged more than the national average of roadway departure fatalities (393 roadway departure fatalities) and had a roadway departure fatality rate per mile greater than the national average (0.52 fatalities per centerline mile); OR 2) annually averaged more than the national average and had a roadway departure fatality rate per VMT greater than the national average (0.73 per 100M VMT).
States are eligible to be Intersection Focus States based on a combination of their average number of intersection fatalities over a three-year period and the ratio of their actual intersection fatality rate versus the expected intersection fatality rate. The expected fatality rates are estimated based on a State’s distribution of urban and rural VMT. Based on these criteria, States are eligible to become Intersection Focus States if their intersection fatalities were more than the national average (154 intersection fatalities per state) and they had an actual-to-expected ratio greater than 1.0. States with a ratio higher than 1.0 have more fatalities than expected given their ratio of urban to rural VMT.
For the pedestrian focus area, FHWA recognizes focus cities and focus States. Cities are eligible to participate as Pedestrian focus cities based on the number of pedestrian fatalities or the pedestrian fatality rate per population over a three-year period. Based on these criteria, cities are identified for eligibility if they had more fatalities than the national average (20 average annual pedestrian fatalities per city) or a pedestrian fatality rate greater than the national average (2.33 per 100,000 population). States that contain a pedestrian focus city are automatically eligible to be considered pedestrian focus States.
The Focused Approach to Safety Program provides a simple four-step process to engage State and local safety stakeholders. These steps form the basis for success and outline how to get started and how to sustain the effort to achieve a State’s safety goals.
For each Focus State, the primary coordinator and advocate from FHWA will be the safety specialist from the local FHWA Division Office. FHWA will assemble a cross-functional, intra-agency team to coordinate the additional resources and options available to the focus State. The team will consist of the Division Office safety specialist, FHWA Resource Center staff, FHWA Office of Safety staff, and contractor support. This team will work directly with the focus State and other State and local safety partners. Working together will result in additional lives saved and injuries prevented.
The team will conduct a kick-off meeting to create a tailored approach to find the right mix of resources (people, time, tools, and training) to assist in meeting the State’s SHSP fatality and serious injury reduction goals for the focus areas identified. In some existing focus States, this will be an opportunity to continue the previous Focused Approach efforts. The safety specialist from the local FHWA Division Office and the team will tailor a Focused Approach strategy for the State that will maximize the benefits to the State. The Focused Approach to Safety allows for deployment of significant FHWA resources to support a comprehensive safety management approach involving the 4 E’s: engineering, enforcement, education, and emergency services.
The adopted State SHSP is the overall plan to meet the State’s safety goals. The Focused Approach is another support resource that a focus State can count on to achieve those goals. As part of the Focused Approach, FHWA will provide additional resources (people, time, tools, and training) to help implement the SHSP. While most resources available from FHWA come at no cost to the State, it is best to anticipate ways to leverage State and Federal resources in order to maximize benefits. For instance, a focus State would be expected to do the following:
The Focused Approach can help States to focus their time and attention on the specific priorities and activities that can make the biggest difference in their safety goals. In many focus States, FHWA can provide a considerable amount of detailed and State-specific data analysis, training, technical assistance, and other resources that the State might have to otherwise perform on its own.
States need ongoing, consistent support to meet long-term safety goals. The Focused Approach provides a long-term partnership between Federal resources and a focus State’s safety needs. Over time, the Focused Approach can be a reliable source of technical assistance and training for each involved State.
The following checklist will serve as a general guide for all involved to successfully deploy the Focused Approach to Safety in the focus States. It is important to tailor the approach to meet the focus States’ capabilities and needs.
Participate in Focused Approach to Safety Webinar 1: Kick-off with FHWA (September 2011).
Invite focus State to Webinar 2.
Participate in Focused Approach to Safety Webinar 2: Kick-off with focus States (September 2011).
Create a tailored approach with the focus State through the Division Office with Resource Center and Office of Safety using the Strategic Highway Safety Plan as the starting point.
Match resources to needs and deliver Focused Approach analysis and implementation plan in the focus State.
Implement the safety projects/activities identified over the years recommended.
Monitor and report challenges and success stories to FHWA Office of Safety.
Maximize return on investment by evaluating program effectiveness.
Since its inception, 36 States have participated in the Focused Approach. Some of these States may not currently meet the new eligibility requirements. FHWA will still provide support to prior focus States, as needed. FHWA wants to hear and share the valuable feedback, lessons learned, and success stories from prior focus States that can assist other focus States as they participate in the Focused Approach to Safety. All States should stay in contact with their safety specialist in the local FHWA Division Office and provide any feedback regarding the Focused Approach to Safety.
All of the guidance, planning tools, training, technical guidebooks, and printed resources created for the Focused Approach are available to all States. FHWA is committed to applying these resources and tools in the focus States. Focus States will receive priority in response to requests for safety resources to address their safety challenges in one or more of the three focus areas. However, non-focus States can use the tools and materials for their own safety efforts. FHWA may be able to apply some technical assistance to non-focus States once the needs of the focus States have been met.
For additional general information on the Focused Approach to Safety please contact:
The following section provides critical information for each of the three focus areas —Roadway Departure, Intersections, and Pedestrians. Each area is described with several success stories and highlights. Finally, the top proven countermeasures are described for each area (additional countermeasures are listed in FHWA’s CMF Clearinghouse, www.cmfclearinghouse.org). The Focused Approach Toolbox, found in Appendix A, has several links to additional resources in one centralized location at the end of this guide.
In addition to working with States to apply the best countermeasures to address high crash locations, each Focus Area stresses the importance of using a low-cost, systemic approach to improve safety. The systemic approach complements, and yet is slightly different than the traditional highway safety management process. The traditional approach starts with the identification of sites with potential for safety improvements and then selects countermeasures to impact crash patterns at those locations. The systemic approach defines a set of specific, proven, low-cost countermeasures and analyzes crash data to identify high risk roadway geometric features where they can be deployed cost effectively (9). Here are two widespread applications:
Benefits of the systemic approach may include the following:
In order to achieve success with the systemic approach, States examine the construction and delivery of low-cost safety solutions. The systemic approach favors centralized decision making and large contracts that can deploy countermeasures throughout the State using on-call contractors for both the study and the implementation (9).
For additional general information on the systemic safety model please contact:
Roadway departure crashes account for the majority of highway fatalities in the United States. An average of 16,551 fatal roadway departure crashes occurred in the US each year between 2007 and 2009 (1). A roadway departure crash is defined as a non-intersection crash that occurs after a vehicle crosses an edgeline or a centerline or otherwise leaves the traveled roadway. FHWA’s Roadway Departure focus area concentrates on:
FHWA currently offers roadway departure technical assistance to State highway agencies in the form of crash data analysis and implementation plan development. Roadway Departure Implementation Plans have been developed for Kentucky, North Carolina, Oregon, South Carolina, and Tennessee, with additional State plans for Louisiana, California, and Arizona at various stages of development. Each plan is designed to address State-specific roadway departure safety issues on both State and local roadways to the extent that relevant data can be obtained and as appropriate based on consultation with State and local agencies and the FHWA Division Office (11).
FHWA works with participating roadway departure focus States to develop an individual data analysis package focused on crash history and roadway attributes and a set of strategies that can be used to reduce roadway departure crashes. Using a systemic approach, the plans identify a set of cost-effective countermeasures, deployment levels, and funding needs to reduce the number and severity of roadway departure crashes in the State by a target amount consistent with their SHSP goals. The final plan quantifies the costs and benefits of a roadway departure-focused initiative and provides a step-by-step process for implementation.
Below are two examples of Roadway Departure Safety Implementation Plans created through the Focused Approach. The first example is from Oregon, and the second example is from Kentucky.
“Although I was fairly skeptical to begin with, I could quickly see the benefits of this new approach. The analysis and the selection of proven countermeasures allowed Oregon to fashion the Roadway Departure initiative in a way that made it our own. Stakeholders were excited about the process and participated readily. We are now in the process of implementing the strategies and we are excited to see the results. We were so sold on the process that we immediately asked to do the same sort of thing for intersections.”
– Douglas W. Bish, P.E., Traffic Services Engineer, Oregon DOT
In 2010, the Oregon DOT and FHWA began a project to analyze roadway departure crashes on both State and local roads. The result of the study would be a Roadway Departure Safety Implementation Plan designed to reduce roadway departure crashes. The plan can be found at the web link in the reference section (13). Roadway departure crashes account for approximately 66 percent of all fatalities in Oregon. Data analysis of Oregon crashes was combined with cost-effective strategies to identify locations for the most effective use of funds to achieve an approximate 20 percent reduction in roadway departure fatalities. This systemic approach involves deploying large numbers of relatively low-cost, cost-effective countermeasures.
Spot location data (by milepost or GPS coordinate) was available for crashes that occurred on State-maintained routes. However, this level of detail was unavailable for crashes occurring on locally-maintained roadways. Crashes could be located on certain roadways but not at a specific point on that roadway. At the time of the data analysis, neither traffic volume counts nor the length of each roadway were available for local roads.
The Oregon DOT faced two significant limitations to the ability to analyze its roadway departure crash data on the local system. Lacking were specific location and roadway attribute information on local roads, which made it impossible to pinpoint specific curves or sections of roadway for treatment. Also, not having traffic counts or roadway lengths made it impossible to calculate crash rates.
Due to these limitations, it was necessary to focus instead on the available information. The State did have information on the contributing circumstances of local crashes, including the following:
The State also had crash data that included the following additional information:
The Oregon DOT and FHWA used this information to identify systemic treatments for local roads, including curve signing and delineation, rumble strips, and tree removal. Cost estimates were based on an average length of 10 miles for each local road, which, when applied over the system, provided a sufficient estimate for preliminary program planning.
The Oregon DOT will proceed with low-cost safety treatments on the identified roadways based on the type of roadway departure crashes that occurred on each local road. They will also seek to improve data availability, starting with determining the length of each local roadway. Future plans include efforts to determine the location of local road crashes along the roadway by coding all crashes by latitude and longitude.
In Kentucky, roadway departure crashes account for more than 60 percent of all highway fatalities. Roadway departure crashes resulted in an average of 628 fatalities annually from 2005-2009. When Kentucky joined the Focused Approach, FHWA first provided a technical training session to the Kentucky Transportation Cabinet (KYTC) and other traffic safety stakeholders. The training included a discussion of recommended roadway departure countermeasures.
The second event was an Implementation Plan Workshop tailored to the roadway departure safety needs of Kentucky. FHWA worked with the State to develop a customized data analysis package and identified a set of cost-effective countermeasures, deployment levels, and funding needed to achieve a 15 percent reduction in roadway departure fatalities. When implemented, this will help Kentucky save up to 65 lives per year. The Implementation Plan developed for KYTC included traditional treatments at high-crash locations, systemic treatments on corridors with a moderate level of crashes, and comprehensive safety solutions incorporating law enforcement and education to reduce the number and severity of roadway departure crashes (12).
KYTC is installing hundreds of miles of rumble strips/stripes in conjunction with its pavement
Kentucky used the customized Implementation Plan and local knowledge of safety problems and effective countermeasures to begin implementing solutions to reduce roadway departure crashes. Kentucky has installed approximately 38 miles of centerline rumble strips on existing two-lane roads with 11-foot or wider lanes. KYTC plans to install more than 100 additional miles of retrofit center line rumble strips in 2011. Kentucky has incorporated rumble strips and rumble stripes into its pavement resurfacing projects, including:
Kentucky is taking advantage of the low cost of rumble strips, especially as add-ons to existing surface overlay projects. Costs to date have been much lower than originally estimated, allowing KYTC to plan for more than 200 additional miles of rumble strips and rumble stripes on resurfacing projects in 2011.
In addition to the rumble strips and rumble stripes effort, Kentucky has selected 32 sites to apply high-friction surface treatments. Increasing friction on roadways with a history of wet weather crashes has been proven to yield significant safety benefits.
In conclusion, Kentucky’s success was predicated on resources provided by the Focused Approach to create an Implementation Plan and targeted resources to address severe roadway departure crashes.
Listed below are four strategies and countermeasures that are commonly used in roadway departure focus States and throughout the United States:
In addition, the Toolbox (Appendix A) provides a comprehensive list of resources to address intersection safety. For additional information on the Roadway Departure Safety Focus Area, please contact:
Between 2007 and 2009, intersection and intersection related crashes accounted for over 7,800 fatalities annually in the US. These crashes represent 21 percent of the annual fatal crashes in the US (1). FHWA recognizes that while a number of States have identified intersection safety as an emphasis area in their SHSP, they may not have an implementation plan to guide their intersection safety implementation activities on State and local roads. To date, FHWA has worked or is working with 16 States to develop Intersection Safety Implementation Plans (ISIPs). (These include Arizona, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Mississippi, Missouri, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, and Washington State.) Using a systemic approach, these ISIPs include the specific activities, countermeasures, strategies, deployment levels, implementation steps, and estimates of funds necessary to achieve the intersection component of the State's SHSP goals (9). FHWA is also providing assistance to those States through webinars, technical assistance, and training courses.
FHWA, and State partners, have recognized the following general tenets through prior Focused Approach activities:
When strategizing intersection safety improvements, States should take steps to help reduce the likelihood that driver errors will take place.
Below are two examples of how the Focused Approach to Safety has helped to advance safety priorities within a State. The first example is from South Carolina and the second example is from Indiana.
South Carolina: Intersection Safety Implementation Plans
“For many years, the safety program in South Carolina focused on improving locations utilizing the “black” spot methodology. At a time when our safety office was in the process of implementing a more systemic/systematic approach to highway safety, we had the opportunity as an FHWA focus State for intersections to receive assistance from FHWA. This effort led to the development of a project to systematically improve safety through low-cost strategies at over 2,200 intersections across the State. These intersections represented only 2% of the State-maintained intersections in the State but accounted for nearly 50% of all intersection fatalities and intersection crashes.
FHWA was very instrumental in the success of the project. They not only provided a comprehensive review and analysis of the statewide crash data but also provided two-day workshops to our headquarters staff in addition to each of our seven district field offices. Statewide training of our construction and maintenance field personnel was needed to improve and create consistency of typical placement of traffic signs, signals, and markings. The training included classroom and field visits and provided information on guidelines and practices aimed at improving traffic safety across the State tailored to SCDOT for improving specific problems SCDOT was experiencing. This workshop provided nearly 200 SCDOT employees with valuable training.”
– D. Brett Harrelson, PE – SCDOT State Traffic Safety Engineer
“As part of the FHWA Focused Approach, SCDOT participated in a training course [that] included partners from the State Highway Safety Office, EMS, and others. Through the workshop, participants developed a comprehensive plan with strategies that could be effectively utilized. The use of a multi-disciplinary approach, the implementation of proven strategies included in the Strategic Highway Safety Plan, the new selection process, and the training provided through the workshop greatly enhanced efforts to improve intersection safety in the State, and resulted in significant reductions in intersection crashes, injuries, and fatalities. During the first year of SHSP implementation (FY 2007 – 2008 compared to FY 2006 – 2007), South Carolina experienced an 8.5% reduction in intersection crashes, an 8.7% reduction in intersection crash injuries, and a 27.8% reduction in intersection crash fatalities.”
– Terecia Wilson, former SCDOT Director of Safety
South Carolina has been an intersection focus State since the program’s inception and now has a mature ISIP that has resulted in the implementation of many low-cost, systemic safety improvement projects. According to the South Carolina SHSP released in February 2007, nearly one out of every five traffic fatalities in South Carolina can be attributed to an intersection crash. In July 2008, FHWA conducted a workshop with staff from the South Carolina Department of Transportation (SCDOT) and safety partners from other organizations to discuss how the intersection safety goals identified in the SHSP could be achieved. The group determined that the targeted reduction in intersection fatalities could be attained if several conditions were met. One of these conditions was that the initiative must incorporate a systemic approach (whereby a combination of low-cost yet cost-effective strategies are implemented at many intersections Statewide) and a comprehensive approach (which emphasizes engineering, education, and enforcement in areas where severe intersection crashes are more frequent). Shortly after the workshop, the South Carolina ISIP was developed “to provide the specifics on countermeasures, actions, key steps, schedules, and investments needed to achieve this goal” of reducing fatalities at intersections throughout South Carolina.
Through the development of its ISIP, South Carolina identified more than 2,000 intersections that were targeted for improvement by the end of 2012. Sites were selected based on a review of crash data and included a variety of intersection types, including rural and urban, signalized and stop-controlled, and those having two-lane and multi-lane cross streets. The construction efforts began in September 2009, and approximately 650 intersections have been improved to date — primarily through upgrades to the existing signing and pavement markings.
South Carolina is one of seven volunteer States participating in the ongoing Evaluation of Low-Cost Safety Improvements Pooled Fund Study (ELCSI-PFS) and will be contributing data for two of the study’s targeted strategies: Signalized Intersection Multi-Strategy Improvements and Stop-Controlled Intersection Multi-Strategy Improvements. Because SCDOT is administering all of its intersection improvements out of its Central Office through a single contract, it has a readily-available centralized database of all completed installations. In addition to the installation data, South Carolina will also be providing its crash, roadway inventory, and traffic volume data associated with each intersection. Each data type will be compiled and linked to the others as part of the documentation of the before-period (i.e., the period of time prior to the intersection being improved). The second phase of the study is expected to commence in the next several years and will involve the analysis of the crash data collected during the after-period so that the safety effectiveness of the intersection strategies can be assessed.
“At a time when INDOT was still forming our local safety program, being a Focus State for Intersections provided us with resources to help educate local agencies, develop a focus on safety initiatives geared to them, and provided training and leadership in conducting successful Road Safety Audits. Additionally, when INDOT and the Indiana LTAP launched HELPERS (Hazard Elimination Local Project for Roads and Streets) to provide outreach to local agencies regarding safety, the Focus State status again allowed for valuable advice and assistance to the staff of that program. The end result is that we were able to deploy HELPERS as an effective local assistance program in a much shorter time frame.”
– Mike Holowaty, State Safety Engineer, Indiana DOT
The Hazard Elimination Local Project for Roads and Streets (HELPERS) serves as the primary assessment program for traffic safety performance and emerging safety needs on local Indiana roads outside of Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) areas. The program is a Local Public Agency’s (LPA) primary point of contact (15). The Focused Approach provided additional resources to educate local agencies, centered leadership on local safety issues, and provided training in how to conduct successful RSAs. This included five statewide safety presentations with involved safety partners, seven safety workshops focused on RSAs, intersection safety, and pedestrian safety, and three local technical assistance efforts. Finally, the Focused Approach shortened the delivery time of these important local assistance programs, particularly the HELPERS program.
As part of the HELPERS program, engineers routinely:
There are four effective strategies and countermeasures that are commonly used in intersection focus States throughout the United States:
In addition, the Toolbox (Appendix A) provides a comprehensive list of resources to address intersection safety. For additional information on the Intersection Safety Focus Area, please contact:
Each year, pedestrian fatalities comprise about 12 percent of all traffic fatalities. Between 2007 and 2009, an average of 4,402 pedestrian fatalities occurred on the Nation’s roadways each year (1). Another 59,000 pedestrians are injured in roadway crashes annually. Pedestrian safety improvements depend on an integrated approach that involves the 4 E’s: engineering, enforcement, education, and emergency services.
FHWA's Office of Safety is aggressively working to reduce pedestrian fatalities by providing resources to focus States and cities. The Focused Approach effort has helped raise awareness of pedestrian safety problems and helped draw attention and resources to generate momentum for addressing pedestrian issues. The Focused Approach has provided support in the form of course offerings, conference calls, web conferences, data analysis, and technical assistance for development of Pedestrian Safety Action Plans, which help focus State and local officials know where to begin to address pedestrian safety issues (16).
The Focused Approach offers free technical assistance and training courses to each of the focus States and cities and free bi-monthly webinars on a comprehensive, systemic approach to preventing pedestrian crashes. Training is available at a cost to non-focus States and cities through the Pedestrian and Bicycle Information Center and is made available through the National Highway Institute (17).
Below are testimonials and examples of Focused Approach implementation from New York City and California.
“The overall training opened my eyes to pedestrians’ needs and the efforts that must be taken in order to provide a safe passageway. This training will no doubt have a positive effect on how I design traffic signals going forward.”
– Jeff P. Lindgren, Nassau County, Department of Public Works
“The training was useful in raising the level of discussion about pedestrian safety issues within the New York City context by providing a baseline of information to a large number of DOT and other city employees.”
– Matthew Roe, New York City DOT
* These quotes, and other information about the pedestrian action plan process can be found in the document: “Pedestrian Safety Action Plan Progress Report: September 2004 – December 2007” online at http://www.walkinginfo.org/training/collateral/PSAPReport_noAppendix.pdf
New York City: Focused Approach Implementation
In 2007, there were 278 pedestrian fatalities in New York State—the fourth highest in the Nation. New York City, with more pedestrian fatalities than any other city, was selected as a focus city. New York’s FHWA Division Office worked with the New York Metropolitan Transportation Council (NYMTC) to coordinate activities. Under the coordination of NYMTC, 12 training courses were delivered in locations throughout the NYMTC region and beyond. Attendees included transportation engineers, law enforcement personnel, transportation planners, and public officials from a variety of State and local government agencies. By 2009, more than 280 people had received training through the Focused Approach. NYMTC continues to promote the courses to local municipalities within and beyond the New York City region (18).
Testimony from training participants has been overwhelmingly positive. All evidence has pointed toward increasing demand for Focused Approach courses throughout the downstate New York region. Many course participants cited interest in attending additional courses on pedestrian safety topics or in providing additional opportunities for colleagues to attend the courses. Focused Approach training participants felt that the courses:
There were several positive outcomes:
In 2006, California was eligible to become a focus State because of its high number of pedestrian fatalities—709, more than any other State in the country. Through the Focused Approach, the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) led a comprehensive effort to deliver pedestrian safety training statewide. Under the coordination of the Caltrans Division of Transportation Planning Bicycle and Pedestrian Program, 13 pedestrian safety courses were offered throughout the State in fiscal years 2006-2007. In addition, several Californians augmented their training by participating in periodic teleconferences and web conferences sponsored by the FHWA’s Pedestrian Safety Program (18).
Overall, the training course participants felt that the training courses offered through the Focused Approach:
Interviewees spoke favorably about the periodic conference calls and web conferences, saying that the calls:
There were several positive outcomes:
The following three countermeasures are commonly used in pedestrian focus States throughout the United States:
In addition, the Toolbox (Appendix A) provides a comprehensive list of resources to address intersection safety. For additional information on the Pedestrian Safety Focus Area, please contact:
This toolbox provides a listing of links to several additional safety resources. Each item is described by which focus area it is designated and whether it is primarily for program delivery, technical assistance, technical tools, guidance, or outreach.
|AASHTO's Strategic Highway Safety Plan (AASHTO, 2005)||X|
|HSIP Assessment Toolbox (FHWA, 2010)||X|
|Lane Departure Strategic Action Plan: Example Plan (FHWA, 2005)||X|
|Pedestrian Safety Strategic Plan (FHWA, 2010)||X|
|Strategic Plan for Improving Roadside Safety (NCHRP, 2001)||X|
|Access Management in the Vicinity of Intersections Technical Summary (FHWA-SA-10-002) (2010)||X|
|Alternative Intersections and Interchanges (FHWA-HRT-09-060) (2009)||X|
|AMFs for Traffic Engineering and ITS Improvements (NHCRP, 2008)||X||X|
|Application of Crash Reduction Factors (CRF) (FHWA-NHI-380093)||X||X||X||X|
|Clear Zone and Horizontal Clearance FAQs (FHWA, 2011)||X|
|Comprehensive Intersection Resource Library (FHWA, 2010)||X|
|Designing and Operating Intersections for Safety (FHWA-NHI-380074)||X|
|Driver Attitudes and Behaviors at Intersections and Potential Effectiveness of Engineering Countermeasures (FHWA, 2006)||X|
|Engineering Countermeasures to Reduce Red-Light Running (FHWA, 2009)||X|
|Evaluation of Pedestrian Countermeasures in Three Cities: San Francisco, Las Vegas, and Miami (FHWA, 2008)||X|
|Interactive FHWA Office of Safety Web conference||X||X||X||X|
|Field Guide for Inspecting Signalized Intersections to Reduce Red-Light Running (FHWA-SA-05-008) (2005)||X|
|Human Factors Issues in Intersection Safety (FHWA, 2009)||X|
|Innovative Intersection Safety Improvement Strategies & Management Practices (FHWA-SA-06-016) (2005)||X|
|Intersection Safety Case Study Series (FHWA, 2009)||X|
|Intersection Safety Technologies – Technical Summary Series (2009)||X|
|Intersection Safety Workshop (FHWA-NHI-380077)||X|
|Low Cost Safety Improvements (FHWA-NHI-380076 and Web-based FHWA-NHI-380083)||X|
|Low-Cost Safety Enhancements for Stop-Controlled and Signalized Intersections (FHWA-SA-09-020) (2009)||X|
|Low-Cost Treatments for Horizontal Curve Safety (FHWA, 2006)||X|
|Mini-Roundabouts Technical Summary (FHWA-SA-10-007) (2010)||X|
|Modern Roundabouts: A Safer Choice Video/DVD (FHWA-SA-10-023) (2010)||X|
|National Strategies for Advancing Child Pedestrian Safety (NHTSA, 2001)||X|
|New Approaches to Highway Safety Analysis (FHWA-NHI-380075)||X||X||X|
|Overview of the Railroad-Highway Grade Crossing Improvement Program (FHWA-NHI-380097)||X|
|Pavement Friction (FHWA)||X|
|Peer-to-Peer technical assistance on Roundabouts-related issues and topics||X|
|Presentations on general intersection safety, signalized intersections, unsignalized intersections, roundabouts, and red-light running.||X|
|Revised Assessment of Economic Impacts of Implementing Minimum Levels of Pavement Marking Retroreflectivity (FHWA, 2010)||X|
|Road Safety Audits/Assessments Training (FHWA-NHI-380069)||X||X||X||X|
|Roadway Departure Safety Implementation Plans (FHWA, 2011)||X|
|Roundabouts: A Safer Choice Brochure (FHWA-SA-08-006) (2008)||X|
|Roundabouts Technical Summary (FHWA-SA-10-006) (2010)||X|
|Safety Benefits of Raised Median and Pedestrian Refuge Areas (FHWA, 2010)||X|
|Safety Benefits of Walkways, Sidewalks, and Paved Shoulders (FHWA, 2010)||X|
|Safety Edge Toolkit (FHWA)||X|
|Safety Evaluation of Improved Curve Delineation (FHWA, 2009)||X|
|Safety Evaluation of Lane and Shoulder Width Combinations on Rural, Two-Lane, Undivided Roads (FHWA, 2009)||X|
|Safety Evaluation of Red Light Cameras (FHWA-HRT-05-048) (2005)||X|
|Stop-Controlled Intersection Safety: Through Route Activated Warning Systems||X|
|Surrogate Safety Assessment Model (SSAM) Tech Brief (FHWA-HRT-08-049) (2008)||X|
|Technical Advisory: Center Line Rumble Strips (FHWA, 2011)||X|
|Technical Advisory: Shoulder and Edge Line Rumble Strips (FHWA, 2011)||X|
|Toolbox of Countermeasures and Their Potential Effectiveness for Pedestrian Crashes (FHWA, 2008)||X|
|Toolbox of Countermeasures and Their Potential Effectiveness for Roadway Departure Crashes (FHWA, 2007)||X|
|Toolbox on Intersection Safety and Design: An ITE Informational Report (sponsored in part by FHWA) (2004)||X|
|Traffic Signal Design and Operation Course (FHWA-NHI-133028)||X|
|Two Low-Cost Safety Concepts for Two-Way Stop-Controlled, Rural Intersections on High-Speed Two-Lane, Two-Way Roadways Summary Report (FHWA-HRT-08-063) (2008)||X|
|Bicycle Countermeasure Selection Tool||X|
|Crash Modification Factors Clearinghouse Brochure (FHWA-SA-10-008) (2010)||X||X||X||X|
|FHWA Signal Timing Manual (FHWA, 2008)||X|
|Highway Safety Manual (AASHTO, 2010)||X||X||X||X|
|Intersection Safety Issue Briefs Third Edition (FHWA-SA-10-005) (2009)||X|
|Intersection Safety Strategies for Improving Safety at Unsignalized and Signalized Intersections (Companions to the NCHRP 500 Series, Volumes 5 and 12) Guide Sheets and Brochure (FHWA-SA-08-008) (2008)||X|
|MUTCD (FHWA, 2009)||X|
|Pedestrian and Bicycle Crash Analysis Tool||X|
|Pedestrian Safety Guide and Countermeasure Selection Tool||X|
|Railroad-Highway Grade Crossing Handbook Revised Second Edition (FHWA-SA-07-010) (2007)||X|
|Red Light Camera Systems Operational Guidelines (FHWA-SA-05-002) (2005)||X|
|Roadside Design Guide (AASHTO, 2002)||X|
|A Resident's Guide for Creating Safe and Walkable Communities (FHWA, 2008)||X|
|Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities (AASHTO 1999)||X|
|Highway Safety Manual Practitioners Guide for Intersections (FHWA-NHI-380105)||X|
|Intersection Safety Implementation Plan Process (FHWA-SA-10-010) (2010)||X|
|Pedestrian and Bicycle Intersection Safety Indices (FHWA, 2007)||X||X|
|Pedestrian Safety Guide for Transit Agencies (FHWA, 2008)||X|
|Roadway Safety Guide (Roadway Safety Foundation)||X|
|Roundabouts: An Informational Guide (FHWA-RD-00-067) (2000)||X|
|Signalized Intersections: Informational Guide (FHWA-HRT-04-091) (2004)||X|
|Strategic Intersection Safety Program Guide (FHWA-SA-09-004) (2009)||X|
|Outreach and Communication|
|Designing for Pedestrian Safety Webinar Series (FHWA)||X|
|FHWA University Course on Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety||X|
|Pedestrian and Bicycle Information Center||X|
|Pedestrian Forum Newsletter (FHWA)||X|
|Pedestrian Safety Campaign||X|
|Planning for Pedestrian Safety Webinar Series (FHWA)||X|
|Safer Bicycle Journey (FHWA)||X|
|Safer Pedestrian Journey (FHWA)||X|
|The Bicycle Safety Education Resource Center||X|