Ohio 2007 Five Percent Report

This report is in response to the Federal requirement that each state describe at least 5 percent of its locations currently exhibiting the most severe highway safety needs, in accordance with Sections 148(c)(1)(D) and 148(g)(3)(A), of Title 23, United States Code. Each state's report is to include potential remedies to the hazardous locations identified; estimated costs of the remedies; and impediments to implementation of the remedies other than costs. The reports included on this web site represent a variety of methods utilized and various degrees of road coverage. Therefore, this report cannot be compared with the other reports included on this Web site.

Protection from Discovery and Admission into Evidence—Under 23 U.S.C. 148(g)(4) information collected or compiled for any purpose directly relating to this report shall not be subject to discovery or admitted into evidence in a Federal or State court proceeding or considered for other purposes in any action for damages arising from any occurrence at a location identified or addressed in the reports.

Additional information, including the specific legislative requirements, can be found in the guidance provided by the Federal Highway Administration,
http://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/safetealu/fiveguidance.htm.

---

Ohio
5 Percent Report

1. Introduction:

Section 1401 of the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (Public Law 109-59) amended Section 148 of Title 23, United States Code, to create a new Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) as one of the Federal Highway Administration's "core" programs. The purpose of the HSIP is to reduce traffic fatalities and serious injuries on public roads.

As part of the new HSIP, states are required to submit an annual report describing not less than 5 percent of their highway locations exhibiting the most severe safety needs. The intent of this provision is to raise public awareness of the highway safety needs and challenges in the states.

2. Data:

The crash data used for the 5 Percent Report is calendar year 2003-2005.

Extent of public road coverage

Historically, the Ohio Department of Transportation has focused efforts on locating crash data to the state highway system - Interstate, US, and State Routes. With the goal of reducing fatalities and injury crashes statewide, the current focus has been to locate all crashes statewide regardless of jurisdiction.

The state system (Interstate, US and state routes) contains approximately 20,000 centerline miles of roadway. The local system (county, township, municipal) contains approximately 100,000 centerline miles of roadway. Even though the state system accounts for only about 17% of the centerline miles statewide, it handles an estimated 65% of the annual vehicle miles traveled in Ohio.

For this 5 Percent Report, the analysis was performed on the state system network (Interstate, US and state routes). Currently, ODOT and local safety partners (MPO's the County Engineers, etc.) have prioritized lists for each respective system; however, the current prioritization process for the local system does not necessarily utilize fatalities and incapacitating injuries as the main prioritizing factor for the locations. Ohio will work to ensure all public roads are analyzed using the methodology and guidance specified by FHWA to prepare the August 31, 2009 Five Percent report.

Schedule for upgrading crash data system to full coverage

Ohio will continue to work on developing a comprehensive crash and roadway data system in order to analyze the network from statewide perspective by FY 2009. The Ohio Department of Transportation is currently working with the County Engineers Association, the Department of Public Safety, the 17 metropolitan planning organizations, FHWA, and local governments to ensure that Ohio will be compliant with the August 31, 2009 report submission to include all public roads in the Five Percent Report analysis. This will be accomplished by using FHWA HPMS modeling data, MPO traffic volume model information, and traffic data from the County Engineers on the local system. A project is currently in progress to update the road inventory network and law enforcement agencies and Public Safety are working to ensure all public roadways will be considered for the crash analyses. Currently, traffic volume exposure data is updated and maintained by the Ohio Department of Transportation for all Interstate, United States, and state routes. The state system traffic data will be integrated with the compiled model and actual traffic volume data on the local system for use on the report due August 31, 2009.

Limitations

At the time the 5 Percent Report locations were run and analyzed the most recent crash data available was calendar year 2003-2005. ODOT is working with the Department of Public Safety and other crash data partners to improve the timeliness with which crash data is reported and made available for analysis purposes. Processes will be put in place to utilize the most current crash data available as well as analyze the entire public roadway network and not just the state system.

4. Analysis:

ODOT has developed the Ohio Enhanced Crash Location Identification System (OECLIS) crash analysis software system for identifying high hazard locations combining analysis factors such as crash frequency, rate, severity, the change in the crashes occurring at a location over time, and equivalent property damage only rate. allowing for a comprehensive methodology to determine hazardous locations. OECLIS also allows ODOT to specify minimum crash thresholds, weighting factors, and other input criteria.

Three years of crash data (2003-2005) are used in conjunction with current signal, volume, and road inventory data files associating each location with its specific operating characteristics. Intersection and intersection-related crashes are examined to ensure each crash is identified with the correct priority roadway, cross-road name and log point. OECLIS first reduces the number of locations by comparing the number of crashes occurring at both intersection and section locations with pre-defined threshold values for frequency, creating pre-candidate locations. The intersection threshold is currently specified at 14 and the section threshold is currently specified at 20 crashes. OECLIS calculates the following values for each pre-candidate location:

crash frequency - The number of crashes occurring at a location - (intersection)

crash density - The number of crashes per mile occurring along a section of roadway

crash rate - The number of crashes occurring per million vehicle miles of traveled for a location.

delta-change - The change in the number of crashes over time using the slope of the regression line to determine whether crashes are increasing or decreasing for a location over time.

equivalent property damage only (EPDO) - The cost to society of a fatal crash, injury crash, and PDO crash normalized to a base of 1.0 for a PDO crash. The number of crashes by severity are multiplied by their respective values and then summed to determine a locations EPDO value.

equivalent property damage only rate (EPDO rate) - Uses the standard rate equation with a base of 1 million and substitutes the EPDO value for the number of crashes in the equation.

relative severity index (RSI) - The Relative Severity Index (RSI) represents the relative cost to society of a specific type of crash (head on, rear end, angle accident, etc.). The RSI for a location is the sum of the relative costs per crash divided by the total number of crashes for a location.

At least one of these calculated values must meet or exceed the threshold applicable for its matching criteria in order to remain as a candidate location. OECLIS then determines each location's rank with respect to each categorical value. OECLIS uses the hazard index method to determine overall ranking. A high hazard location list is developed for freeway and non-freeway locations separately. OECLIS calculates a priority index value for each location. ODOT specifies the weight given to the six categories to be included as factors for the final priority index calculations. The values for each location and method selected are multiplied by their corresponding weight value. Those products are then summed, giving the priority index value for that location. The resulting priority index values of all locations are then sorted to determine the priority hazard index rank for all location candidates.

From the 500 location high crash listing that is output (100 intersections, 400 sections), the intersections and sections were then ranked based on fatalities and incapacitating injuries. An equation was developed for the combination of the fatalities and incapacitating injuries = 2*(# of fatalities) + (# of incapacitating injuries). Since Ohio's Strategic Highway Safety Plan has a goal of reaching 1.0 fatality per 100 million vehicle miles of travel, the fatalities were given a weighting of two times that of an incapacitating injuries. From this ranked list the top 5 Percent most severe safety needs were reported based on the combination factor of fatalities and incapacitating injuries or a total of 25 locations.

Limitations

The analysis performed using 3 years worth of crash data to perform the analysis. Since this Five Percent Report targets fatalities and incapacitating injuries, which tend to be less concentrated than overall crashes, including additional years for the crash analysis will be considered for future Five Percent Reports. The analysis process to develop the candidate list of locations attempts to eliminate the potential for one factor to skew the resultant locations set by factoring in and weighting 5 proven highway safety crash analysis factors (rate, frequency, severity, etc.). ODOT attempted to address the concern by aggregating and weighting the fatalities times 2 and adding the incapacitating injuries for the output locations. This methodology will be reviewed and updated both from ODOT's internal analysis and as FHWA prepare additional guidance for the states.

5. State Contact:

Jonathan Hughes
jonathan.hughes@dot.state.oh.us
614-466-4019
Ohio Department of Transportation
Office of Systems Planning and Program Management
1980 West Broad Street
Columbus, OH 43223

Attachment A
2007 Five Percent Report
Highway Segments/Intersections Exhibiting the Most Severe Safety Needs
(Minimum of 5%)

Map ID	Location (County-Route-Section)	Potential Remedies (L-Low Cost, M-Medium Cost, H-High Cost; S-Short Term; M-Medium Term; L-Long Term)	Estimated Costs	Implementation Impediments (Other than Cost)	Comments	Intersection/ Interchange- I; Section/ Corridor - S	CHSP Ephasis Area
17	CUY-IR-90; 16.26-17.74 (Interstate 90 from Broadway Ave. to Superior Ave.)	Reconfigure access and adding capacity. Included in the innerbelt redesign-HL	Entire project cost $300,000,000	Public opposition to proposed project. Impacts to historical buildings, high traffic volumes, right-of-way acquisition.	Surface was milled to channel water off the roadway and increase skid resistance; Installed delineation; Road Crewzer Program in place	S	Emphasis area V-Incident and congestion Rear End crashes
18	CUY-IR-271; 10.86-11.44 (Interstate 271 – Cedar / Brainard Rd. Interchange)	Capacity improvements on local street system-HL	$3,000,000	Site outside the State's jurisdiction	Interchange improvements were made. Additional capacity improvements on local street system needed to complete countermeasure (project currently under construction by the county engineer).	I	Emphasis area V-Incident and congestion Rear End crashes
19	CUY-US-6; 21.28-24.42 (US-6 from Forrest Hills Blvd. to Green Rd.)	Upgrade signal heads from 8" to 12"; analyze signal timing and interconnection; Install left turn lanes-MM	$300,000	Site outside the State's jurisdiction		S	Emphasis area II- Intersection crashes
20	FRA-IR-70; 12.89-13.09 (The overlap of IR-70 and IR-71 through the downtown Columbus area)	Increase capacity and reduce weaves by eliminating exit and entrance ramps. Construct a collector-distributor system.	$800,000,000	Environmentally sensitive features near the location, Impacts historical building, Right-of-way acquisition, High traffic volumes, Site outside the State's jurisdiction	Project is partially funded.	S	Serious Crash Types, Aggressive Driving
21	FRA-IR-71; 17.87-18.14 (IR-71 from Spring St. north to just north of IR-670.)	Increase capacity and reduce weaves by eliminating exit and entrance ramps. Construct a collector-distributor system.	$300,000,000	Environmentally sensitive features near the location, Impacts historical building, Right-of-way acquisition, High traffic volumes, Site outside the State's jurisdiction	Inside the City of Columbus	S	Serious Crash Types, Aggressive Driving
22	FRA-IR-71; 18.48-19.52 (Interstate-71 from just south of Norfolk and Southern Railroad underpass north to just south of Eleventh Ave.)	Increase capacity and reduce weaves by eliminating exit and entrance ramps.	$300,000,000	Environmentally sensitive features near the location, Impacts historical building, Right-of-way acquisition, High traffic volumes, Site outside the State's jurisdiction	Inside the City of Columbus	S	Serious Crash Types, Aggressive Driving
23	FRA-IR-71; 26.26-26.65 (Interstate-71 from the northbound ramp to SR-161 (Dublin-Granville Rd.) north to the ramp from SR-161)	LS - Upgrade signing and signal timing. HL - provide dual left turn lanes on SR-161.	$6,000,000	High traffic volumes, Site outside of State's jurisdiction		I	Intersection, Rear End crashes, Aggressive driving
24	FRA-IR-270; 32.09-32.52 (IR-270 from the southbound ramp to CR-17 (Morse Rd.) south to the northbound ramp to CR-17)	Continue the increased enforcement.	$100,000	Law enforcement's staffing levels and abilities to patrol this area.	The $1.2 M NEXT project (under construction) is just outside this areas limits and expected to modify the crash pattern in this area.	I	Aggressive drivers
25	FRA-IR-670; 3.34-4.39 (IR-670 from the eastbound ramp from Neil Ave to Cleveland Ave.)	LS - Reduce speeds thru education and enforcement. MM - Complete a pavement marking and signing study for the entire length of IR-670 and implement the recommendation. HL - Reconstruct IR-670 to increase capacity	$110,000,000	High traffic volumes, right-of-way acquisition, Impacts historical building	Inside the City of Columbus	S	Rear End crashes, Aggressive driving, impaired by Alcohol
26	FRA-SR-16; 4.61-7.16 (SR-16 (East Broad St.) from Edgevale Rd. east to Woodcliffe Dr.)	LS - Update signal timing and construction, upgrade pavement markings and signing. Increased enforcement. Apply access management principles by installing a raised median. Coordinate traffic signal operations	$2,000,000	Right-of-way acquisition; Site outside of state jurisdiction, High traffic volumes		S	Rear End crashes, Aggressive driving, impaired by Alcohol, Pedestrians/Bicycles
27	FRA-SR-16; 4.8-4.88 (SR-16 (East Broad St.) at the intersection with James Rd.)	LS - Update signal timing and construction, upgrade pavement markings and signing. Increased enforcement. Apply access management principles. Remove offset within intersection and increase lane widths.	$1,500,000	Right-of-way acquisition; Site outside of state jurisdiction, High traffic volumes		I	Intersection, Aggressive driving, impaired by Alcohol, Pedestrians/Bicycles
28	FRA-SR-161; 13.29-13.37 (SR-161 (Dublin-Granville Rd.) at the intersection with Cleveland Ave.)	LS - Revise signal timing and remove right turn overlap and revise signage. Reconstruct private drive entrance. HL - Construct dual left turns on Cleveland Ave and an exclusive north bound right turn lane.	$1,000,000	Right-of-way acquisition; Site outside of state jurisdiction		I	Intersection, Aggressive Driving, Rear End crashes
29	FRA-SR-317; 12.97-13.05 (The intersection of SR-317 (Hamilton Rd.) with East Livingston Ave.)	LS - Adj. signal timing to traffic patterns, modify signing and increase enforcement. MM - apply access management principles and remove bus stops from through lanes. HL - construct raised median in functional area of intersection.	$1,400,000	Right-of-way acquisition; Site outside of state jurisdiction	Inside the City of Columbus	I	Intersection, Aggressive Driving
30	HAM-IR-75 1.00-4.14 (IR-75 from the Linn Street Overpass to the Crosswalk Overpass, approximately 0.20 south of IR-74)	LS- At various locations add rumble strips to shoulders, provide 6 inch pavement markings , upgrade signage, and increase friction (PID 82159) ML- Work with SORTA to analyze express bus service HL- Reconfigure interchanges and increase capacity on I75 by adding a lane in each direction with the Millcreek Expressway Project (PID 76257) and the Brent Spence Bridge Replacement (PID 75119)	LS- $275,000 ML- $2,000,000 HL- Mill Creek Expressway alternatives costs approximately $500,000,000 and Brent Spence costs range from $500,000,000 to $1,000,000,000	LS- High traffic volumes ML- High costs of improving shoulders, high traffic volumes HL- High traffic volumes, environmentally sensitive features, extensive right-of-way acquisition, overcoming funding constraints, and political and public opposition to the proposed modifications	LS- Safety funds secured for improvements ML- SORTA involved as a stakeholder on Mill Creek Expressway and Brent Spence Studies HL- Worked closely with local governments and stakeholders to evaluate alternative alignments and interchange options; phased project improvements to minimize costs	S	Aggressive Driving Motor Carriers Rear End Crashes Work Zone Crashes
31	HAM-IR-75 6.02-17.47 (IR-75 from the Clifton Road Underpass to the Butler County Line)	LS- At various locations add rumble strips to shoulders, provide 6 inch pavement markings , upgrade signage, remove vegetation, provide linear delineation on barriers, and increase friction (PID 82159) ML- Work with SORTA to analyze express bus service HL- Reconfigure interchanges and increase capacity on I75 by adding a lane in each direction with the Mill Creek Expressway Project (PID 76257) and the Thru the Valley Project (PID 76256)	LS- $275,000 ML- $2,000,000 HL- Mill Creek Expressway and Thru the Valley alternatives cost approximately $500,000,000 each	LS- High traffic volumes ML- High costs of improving shoulders, high traffic volumes HL- High traffic volumes, environmentally sensitive features, extensive right-of-way acquisition, overcoming funding constraints, and political and public opposition to the proposed modifications	LS- Safety funds secured for improvements ML- SORTA involved as a stakeholder on Mill Creek Expressway and Thru the Valley Studies HL- Worked closely with local governments and stakeholders to evaluate alternative alignments and interchange options at Galbraith Road and other locations; phased project improvements to minimize costs	S	Aggressive Driving Motor Carriers Rear End Crashes Work Zone Crashes
32	HAM-SR-264 8.92-14.29 (SR-264 from Karen Avenue to W 8th Street. Approximately 5.4 miles of this route is within the City of Cincinnati)	MM- Provide new pavement surface with urban paving and remove on street parking (PID 75876)	MM- $3,000,000	MM- Site outside the State's jurisdiction, narrow right-of-way, political and public opposition	MM- City of Cincinnati investigating countermeasure	S	Intersection Crashes Aggressive Driving Pedestrians/Bicycles Rear End Crashes
33	HAM-US-27 6.69-7.44 (US-27 from Kirby to 0.3 miles south of Raeburn Avenue. This section is within the City of Cincinnati)	LS- Provide "Prepare to Stop When Flashing" sign on exit ramp from IR-74, Consider road diet on US-27 from Powers to Blue Rock MM- Provide southbound left and right turn lanes on US-27 at Virginia and widen to provide 12' lanes (PID 77484)	LS- $750,000 MM- $4,250,000	LS- Site outside the State's jurisdiction MM- Site outside the State's jurisdiction, narrow right-of-way	LS- ODOT Traffic investigating signage on IR-74 exit ramp and working with City of Cincinnati to investigate road diet MM- Project to sell in 2009	S	Intersection Crashes Aggressive Driving Rear End Crashes Head On Crashes
34	HAM-US-27 7.56-10.00 (US-27 from approximately 0.25 miles south of Raeburn Avenue to the City of Cincinnati corporation limit, which is just south of the intersection of Kipling and Blue Rock Road)	LS- Provide intersection warning signs, improved sight distance, and street lighting at various locations and a protected-only left turn phase on North Bend	LS- $300,000	LS- site outside of jurisdiction	Inside the City of Cincinniti	S	Intersection Crashes Rear End Crashes
35	HAM-US-42 2.67-5.69 (US-42 from Dorchester Avenue to Avondale Avenue. This location is within the City of Cincinnati)	LS- Provide a stop sign in the slip ramp to NB Reading Road and IR-71, Remove street parking for a drop right turn lane at private driveway, update pavement markings	LS- $500,000	LS- Site outside of the Stat'e jurisdiction	LS- City of Cincinnati investigating countermeasure	S	Intersection Crashes Rear End Crashes
36	HAM-US-127 5.43-10.43 (US-127 from Cosby Street to Madison Road. This location spans City of Cincinnati, North College Hill, and Mount Healthy jurisdictions)	LS- Designate private driveway as right-in/right-out, designate Kemper Avenue as right-in/right-out, update pavement markings at SR-126 interchange, provide additional signage to show that northbound lane ends at Madison, coordinate signal system, provide RPM	LS- $500,000	LS- Site outside of the Stat'e jurisdiction	LS- City of Cincinnati, Mount Healthy, and North College Hill investigating countermeasures	S	Intersection Crashes Rear End Crashes
37	LUC-SR- 184; 6.45 - 6.53 (Intersection of SR-184 and Lewis Ave.)	LS - Additional Enforcement; HM - Resurface, upgrade pavement markings, reailign NB Lewis Ave. approach to SR-184, install right turn lanes on SR-184 @ Lewis Ave. upgrade traffic signal and evaluate the signal timing.	$3,500,000	Right-of-way acquisition; Site outside the State's jurisdiction	Inside the City of Toledo	I	Impaired by Alcohol, Rear End Crashes
38	LUC-SR-246; 1.5 - 3.56 (SR-246 (Dorr St.) from Independence Rd. to Shirley Ave., Section is near University of Toledo)	LS - Additional Enforcement; HM - Resurface, upgrade pavement markings, evaluate signal timings.	$5,000,000	Site outside the State's jurisdiction	Inside the City of Toledo, Portion of the section was under major reconstruction and widening in 2004/05.	S	Impaired by Alcohol,Young Driver – 15 to 25, Rear End crashes
39	MOT-IR-75, 3.5 - 4.04 (Interstate 75 and the interchange with SR 725.	LS Signal timing adjustments at the ramp signals. MM - Remove WB slip ramp, Add exclusive RT Lane, at SR 725 and NB Ramp, remove inside merge from the NB onramp.	$1,000,000	High traffic volume	On SR 725 there is additional traffic signals within close proximity.	I	Rear end crashes, side swipe crashes
40	MOT-SR-48, 14.51-16.14	LS Signal timing adjustments, new coordiation patterns. HL-Widen to 5 lane	$10,000,000	Outside state jurisdiction, major R/W purchase.	Main St in the City of Dayton. Narrow Lane width (10-11 ft)	S	Rear-end, sideswipe, and Angle Crashes
41	SUM-IR-76; 10.32-11.15 (Interstate-76 from Main St Interchange to IR-77/SR-8 'Central Interchange')	HL - Reconstruct IR-76/77 access points geometry ---------------------- HL - Reconstruct / reconfigure Central Interchange	$144,000,000 ------------------ $258,000,000	High traffic volumes	LS - Signing / Striping / Delineation / MM - Resurfacing completed in '03,'04,'05	S	Rear End crashes

Note: A detailed crash analysis will need to be conducted to determine the most appropriate and cost-effective, potential remedy. No determination has been made of the potential remedies contained in this report as to their effectiveness in reducing fatalities and serious injuries. The potential remedies and costs are presented as typical remedies and costs. It is recognized and expected that details and costs of the proposed improvements would change if a project was developed.

Attachment B
2006 Five Percent Report
Highway Segments/Intersections Exhibiting the Most Severe Safety Needs
(Minimum of 5%)

Map ID	Location (County-Route-Section)	Potential Remedies	Estimated Costs	Implementation Impediments (Other than Cost)	Comments
1	CLE-SR-032; 1.36-2.34	Reconstruct the interchanges with IR275 and Eastgate Blvd.	$100,000,000	Unknown
2	CLE-SR-125; 4.69-5.19	Reconstruct intersections of Amelia Olive Branch and White Oak and access management on section	$10,000,000	Impacts to businesses / right of way.	Project partially funded.
3	CLE-US-050; 7.66-8.26	Realign curves and flatten grade	$5,000,000	Historic properties and stream / environmental issues.
4	CUY-IR-090; 13.25-14.37	Implement Freeway Management System (ITS)	$30,000,000	Unknown	Resurfaced with skid resistant material. Installed ASIS (Advanced Speed Information Signs).
5	CUY-IR-090; 16.26-17.7	Cleveland I-90 Major Innerbelt Project	$860,000,000	Environmental and historic impacts
6	DEL-US-023; 1.39-1.39	Construct continuous flow intersection	$5,000,000	Right of way / environmental issues
7	FRA-IR-070; 13.1-13.22	Downtown 70/71 Split Project programmed project (capacity increase)	$800,000,000	Right of way / environmental issues
8	FRA-IR-070; 20.79-21.83	Modify interchanges at SR 317 and at IR 270	$250,000,000	Right of way / environmental issues	Congestion at IR270 causes I70 backups.
9	FRA-IR-071; 26.46-26.46	Upgrade signing and signal timing	$150,000	None	Coordinating with City.
10	FRA-US-040; 3.62-3.62	Signalize intersection	$70,000	None	Installed 4-12-06.
11	HAM-IR-075; 1-2.9	Reconfigure interchanges and increase capacity on I75	$500,000,000	Historic properties, utility conflicts and other cultural issues.	Part of the Brent Spence Bridge Project.
12	LUC-SR-025; 7.18-7.18	Realign left turn lanes to achieve positive offset, modify signal timing, upgrade signal, resurface and upgrade pavement markings to thermoplastic.	$500,000	None	Red light cameras in 2001, SR-25 resurfacing, intersection turning radii improvements and thermoplastic pavement markings in 2002.
13	LUC-SR-184; 6.49-6.49	Upgrade signal, modify signal timing, install right turn lanes, realign the NB Lewis Ave. and WB SR-184 approaches, resurface and upgrade pavement markings to thermoplastic.	$1,200,000	Right of way.	Lewis Ave. widened to 5 lanes in 2001, Red light cameras in 2001, LED signal heads with back plates in 2003. Signal controller upgrades in 2005.
14	MAH-US-224; 17.5-18.37	Access Management. Creation of backage roads. Major intersection upgrades.	$20,000,000	Significant right of way required. Negative impacts to businesses.	Highly developed commercial retail area.
15	POR-SR-005; 3.3-3.3	Turn restrictions / elimination of intersection	$7,000,000	Negative impacts to businesses.	Improvements to surrounding impacted state and local routes required.
16	WOO-SR-795; 4.8-4.8	Resurface 400' North & South of Intersection on Oregon Rd. and upgrade pavement markings to thermoplastic.	$250,000	None	Signal timing modified & coordination implemented in 2005. SR-795 micro surfaced in 2006. Traffic pattern has not been normal at the intersection due to SR-795 being the detour route for the closures of IR-280 for the Maumee River Crossing. FY 2007 Project.

2002-2004 Crash Data Used

Locations sorted ascending by county-route-section

Note: A detailed crash analysis will need to be conducted to determine the most appropriate and cost-effective, potential remedy. No determination has been made of the potential remedies contained in this report as to their effectiveness in reducing fatalities and serious injuries. The potential remedies and costs are presented as typical remedies and costs. It is recognized and expected that details and costs of the proposed improvements would change if a project was developed.