Tennessee 2007 Five Percent Report
This report is in response to the Federal requirement that each state describe at least 5 percent of its locations currently exhibiting the most severe highway safety needs, in accordance with Sections 148(c)(1)(D) and 148(g)(3)(A), of Title 23, United States Code. Each state's report is to include potential remedies to the hazardous locations identified; estimated costs of the remedies; and impediments to implementation of the remedies other than costs. The reports included on this web site represent a variety of methods utilized and various degrees of road coverage. Therefore, this report cannot be compared with the other reports included on this Web site.
Protection from Discovery and Admission into Evidence—Under 23 U.S.C. 148(g)(4) information collected or compiled for any purpose directly relating to this report shall not be subject to discovery or admitted into evidence in a Federal or State court proceeding or considered for other purposes in any action for damages arising from any occurrence at a location identified or addressed in the reports. |
Additional information, including the specific legislative requirements, can be found in the guidance provided by the Federal Highway Administration,
http://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/safetealu/fiveguidance.htm.
STATE OF TENNESSEE
5 Percent Report
From July 1, 2006 to June 30, 2007
Tennessee Department of Transportation
Project Planning Division
Tennessee 5 Percent Report
A. Purpose of 5 Percent Report
Section 1401 of the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU) amended Section 148 of Title 23 USC to create the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) as a "core" FHWA program with separate funding, replacing the Hazard Elimination Program in 23 USC Section 152, effective October 1, 2005. The purpose of the HSIP as stated in Section 148(b)(2) is to reduce traffic fatalities and serious injuries on public roads. As part of the HSIP, States are required to submit an annual report describing not less than 5 percent of their highway locations exhibiting the most severe safety needs [Section 148(c)(1)(D)].
The Tennessee Department of Transportation (TDOT) implements the HSIP through its Project Planning Division to make safety improvements at highway locations exhibiting the most severe safety needs through Road Safety Audit Reviews (RSARs). These safety improvement projects take into consideration all road users, including motor vehicle operators, bicyclists, and pedestrians. The purpose of this report is to briefly describe the HSIP and the locations ranked highest for safety needs in fulfillment of the annual 5 percent report requirement for the period from July 1, 2006 to June 30, 2007 for the State of Tennessee.
B. Extent of coverage of public roads
Tennessee has approximately 90,400 miles of public roads. They consist of approximately 1,100 miles of Interstates, 12,700 miles of State Routes, 14,300 miles of Local Minor Collectors, and 62,300 miles of Local Other Roads (owned/maintained by counties or cities). TDOT maintains the Interstates, State Routes, and Local Minor Collectors; and a large database is kept. The database is in the process of being updated so that Local Other Roads will be included.
C. Methodology
The criteria used to produce the 2006 HSIP list of potential safety projects has changed from previous years. The list should be referred as the HSIP List rather than a Hazard Elimination Safety Program (HESP) List because some projects that may be developed will qualify for funding under HSIP but not under the HESP.
The final list included locations identified by using three slightly different criteria, but all locations have experienced fatal and/or incapacitating injury crashes. For the remainder of this report, these will be referred to as severe crashes.
One set of criteria was for intersections that met the previous criteria and had experienced severe crashes. The previous criteria were a minimum of 7 crashes in the latest three year period of available crash data and the actual crash rate was 4 or more times the critical rate. A ratio of the actual rate to critical rate of 3.5 or better was accepted when reviewing the data used to generate the list. This has been the accepted procedure because of errors in the data and the use of assumed values within the software. A location with a ratio of 3.5 or higher can also be added to the list.
As lane departure has been identified as a major cause of fatal crashes, severe lane departure crashes were evaluated for the next set of locations. The specific criteria were 7 or more crashes, the location experienced severe lane departure crashes and the actual crash rate was 3 or more times the critical rate. The 3.0 ratio of the actual crash rate to critical crash rate would be the lowest value accepted for these locations.
The third set of locations is on Local Functionally Classified routes and had experienced fatal lane departure crashes. Additionally, they had 7 or more crashes and the actual crash rate was 3 or more times the critical rate. The 3.0 ratio of the actual crash rate to critical crash rate would be the lowest value accepted for these locations.
The critical rate is used to compare the actual rate with the statewide average rate of locations with similar characteristics and is calculated by adding a confidence interval to the statewide average rate.
These sets of locations were reviewed for prior study and/or improvements. The locations remaining after this review were combined into one list and ranked by severity index. The severity index was calculated by the formula of the sum of 4 times the number of fatal crashes plus 2 times the incapacitating injury crashes plus the number of other injury crashes divided by the total number of crashes. This weighting of the fatal and incapacitating injury crashes gives a higher ranking to locations with a large number of more severe crashes.
The 2006 HSIP List is a revision over the previous years to meet the intent of the guidelines set forth in SAFETEA-LU. The list was generated by use of new software that was developed to meet the HESP and High Risk Rural Roads (HRRR) requirements of SAFETEA-LU. The development of this software was necessary to recognize the qualifying roadways and consider the crash severity necessary to identify these safety issues. Further development of this software is proposed to allow better management capability, permit access by other TDOT employees, and add functions such as corridor analyses and reports.
D. Total number of projects
From July 1, 2006 to June 30, 2007, a total of thirty nine (39) RSAR projects were conducted by TDOT. Based on the federal criteria of describing not less than 5 percent of Tennessee's highway locations exhibiting the most severe safety needs, the calculation for the minimum number of projects required to be described is provided below.
39 x 0.05 = 1.95
Therefore, a minimum of two (2) projects are required to be described.
E. Specific project descriptions
Descriptions of the three (3) highest ranking highway locations exhibiting the most severe safety needs in Tennessee are provided in the following table, exceeding the federal 5 percent reporting requirement.
| Location | Potential Remedies | Estimated Costs | Implementation Impediments | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Route 1129 Marion County |
|
$120,000 | None. | Implementation is in progress. |
| Route 1129 Marion County (continued) |
|
|||
| SR-115 (US-129) Blount County |
|
$900.900 | None. | Implementation is in progress. |
| SR-115 (US-129) Blount County (continued) |
|
|||
| SR-115 (US-129) Blount County (continued) |
|
|||
| SR-115 (US-129) Blount County (continued) |
|
|||
| Interstate 40 Roane County |
|
$508,200 | None. | Implementation is in progress. |
