|
|
Home > Intersection Safety > Signalized Intersections
FHWA / AASHTO Scan Signalized Intersection Safety
Downloadable Version
PDF [0.99 MB]
PPT [14.5 MB]
Scan Approach
- Develop an overview paper framing the issues and scope
- Assemble a diversified team of experts
- Complete a desk scan report to identify agencies to visit abroad
- Develop amplifying questions for host agencies
- Complete scan and prepare summary report
- Implement promising strategies
Goals and Objectives
- To identify promising and readily implementable intersection-safety solutions and/or programs for deployment in the United States.
- To identify and overcome implementation barriers and special needs.
- To gather specific examples and documentation
The Scan Team - 13 Members
- Representatives:
- 3 - FHWA
- 1 - AASHTO
- 3 - State DOT's
- 3 - Municipal Transportation Agencies
- 1 - University
- 2 - Private sector/non-profit
The Scanning Team

The Team
Gene K. Fong, Co-Chair Director of Field Services – East, FHWA
James H. Kopf, Co-Chair Chief Engineer, Deputy Executive Director Mississippi DOT
Philip J. Clark Deputy Chief Engineer/Director Design Division NY State DOT
Rick Collins Engineer of Traffic, TX DOT
Richard A. Cunard Engineer of Traffic and Operations Transportation Research Board
Ken F. Kobetsky Program Director for Engineering AASHTO
Nazir Lalani Principal Engineer, Transportation Dept., County of Ventura
Fred N. Ranck Safety Engineer, FHWA Midwestern Resource Center
Robert K. Seyfried Director, Transportation Engineering Division Northwestern University
Kevin Slack VP, Senior Transportation Engineer CH2M Hill
James W. Sparks Deputy Street Transportation Director, City of Phoenix, AZ
Rudolph M. Umbs, P.E. Chief Highway Safety Engineer, FHWA
Stephen N. Van Winkle Director of Public Works City of Peoria
Six Focus Areas
- Selection,Design, Operation of Traffic Control Devices
- Innovative Traffic Control Devices
- Innovative Geometric Design
- Identify Problems & Select Countermeasures
- Low Cost Improvements
- Research Projects
Countries Visited

Working Meetings
55 presentations followed by Q. and A.





Site Visits





Findings & Observations - Sweden
- Intersection Safety driven by national Goals set forth in "Vision Zero" (50% reduction in fatalities 1997 to 2007)
- Safety efforts are focused on fatalities and injuries (serious accidents)
- Emphasize the safety of vulnerable road users (peds & bikes)
- Developed LHOVRA to address safety at isolated intersections
- Special detectors being used at school crossings

Findings & Observations - Germany
- Local, multidisciplinary, safety commissions set safety priorities and identify solutions
- Thorough, uniform calculations are completed to determine conflict clearance for all modes of travel at signalized intersections
- Extensive use of pavement markings for peds & bikes
- Use cameras for red light running and speed enforcement
- Formalized safety checklists are completed during design phase (safety audits)
Findings & Observations - The Netherlands
- Intersection safety driven by national sustainable safety goals
- Philosophy is to reduce speed through intersections.
- Extensive use of photo enforcement to control speed and red light running
- Converting signalized intersections to roundabouts (rural)
- Use of comprehensive public relations campaigns to convey safety message
- Consistency by functional classification is a key to safety


Findings & Observations - United Kingdom
- Challenged to balance safety with congestion/mobility
- Developed MOVA to improve safety and operations at isolated locations

- Detector technology being deployed to improve safety and operations of ped. & bike crossings
- Using accident prediction models for signalized intersection design (OSCADY)
- Comprehensive safety audit process - Planning, Design, Construction, Operation

Preliminary Recommendations
- Develop model photo enforcement process/program for implementation at signalized intersections
- Build on European experience
- Communicate process through ITE, AASHTO, Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, etc.




- Develop a pilot project to control speed through intersections using a combination of practices implemented in Europe
- Geometric (lane widths & speed tables)
- Pavement markings
- Variable message signs
- Photo enforcement, etc.


- Promote understanding and the application of single lane roundabouts as alternatives to signalized intersections
- Emphasis on managing the consequences of collisions
- Efficient use of computer simulation (operational and geometric)
- Determine the appropriate circumstances

- Develop Guidelines and identify pilot projects to enhance pedestrian Crossings
- pedestrian detection technology
- audible pedestrian signals
- Pedestrian Countdown indicators
- improve communication with drivers and pedestrians


Next Steps
- Draft report by early September 2002
- Team and agency Review by November 2002.
- Final Report Spring 2003
- Implementation begins May 28, 2003
Implementation Team Contacts
- Fred Ranck, Chairman - Safety Engineer, Midwestern Resource Center, FHWA - 708-283-3545, fred.ranck@fhwa.dot.gov
- Rick Collins - Engineer of Traffic, TexDOT - 512-416-3135, rcollins@dot.state.tx.us
- Ken Kobetsky - Program Director for Engineering, AASHTO - 202-624-5254, kenk@aashto.org
- Nazir Lalani - Principal Engineer, County of Ventura - 805-654-2080, nazir.lalani@mail.co.ventura.ca.us
- Jim Sparks - Deputy Street Transportation Director, City of Phoenix - 602-262-4435, jsparks@ci.phoenix.az.us
- Rudolph Umbs - Chief Highway Safety Engineer, FHWA - 202-365-3285, rudolph.umbs@fhwa.dot.gov
Team Information Sharing
- Mississippi Transportation Institute, Oct 2002
- AASHTO Subcommittee on Design, Jun 2002
- AASHTO Subcommittee on Traffic Engineering, Jun. 2002
- AASHTO Task Force on Geometric Design, Jun 2002
- AASHTO Annual Meeting, Oct 2003
- AASHTO Standing Committee on Traffic Safety
- AASHTO Standing Committee on Highways
- FHWA Annual Leadership Meeting, Jun 2002
- FHWA Signalized Intersection Design Guidelines Task Force
Team Information Sharing
- National Committee on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (NCUTCD), Jun 2002
- NCUTCD, Jan 2003
- American Public Works Association, Sep 2002
- TxDOT Traffic Operations Conference, June 2002
- Northwestern University Continuing Education Courses:
- Traffic Signal Workshop
- Traffic Control Devices Workshop
- Traffic and Transportation Engineering Seminar
- Bicycle Facilities Planning and Design Workshop
- Pedestrian Facilities Planning and Design Workshop
Team Information Sharing
- ITE International Meeting, Aug 2002
- ITE, Illinois Section, Oct 2002
- ITE, Intermountian Section, May 2002
- ITE, Arizona Section Sep 2002
- ITE, Local Sections in CA, NV, OR, WA
- ITE, Fundamentals of Traffic Engineering Course, Oct 2002, Jan 2003, May 2003
- TRB Signalized Intersection Committee Meeting, Jul 2002
- European Transport Forum, Sep 2002
- TRB Sessions at the national meeting, Jan 2003
- Urban Street Design Symposium, Sep 2003
FHWA / AASHTO Scan
Signalized Intersection Safety
Questions?
|
Program Contact
Ed Rice
ed.rice@dot.gov
202-366-9064
What's New
Presentation: Intersection Safety
Example Intersection Safety Implementation Plan
Intersection Safety Implementation Plan Workshop
Example Data Analysis Package and Straw Man Outline
Intersection Safety Implementation Plan Process
Report on the National Agenda for Intersection Safety
Intersection Safety Needs Identification Report
Highlights
FHWA Guidance Memo Contains Provisions to Improve Intersection Safety
Presentation: Safety at Unsignalized Intersections
Presentation: Safety Aspects of Roundabouts
Presentation: Unsignalized Intersection Safety Strategies (NCHRP Report 500, Vol. 5)
Presentation: Signalized Intersection Safety Strategies (NCHRP Report 500, Vol. 12)
Presentation: Safety at Signalized Intersections
Presentation: Red Light Running
Strategic Intersection Safety Program Guide
|