U.S. Department of Transportation
Federal Highway Administration
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Washington, DC 20590
A Publication of the Federal Highway Administration Safety Program
December 2006 - Volume 1, Issue 1
In This Issue
Safety Compass Newsletter
A publication of the Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration The Safety Compass newsletter is published for internet distribution quarterly by the:
FHWA Office of Safety
400 Seventh Street SW, Room 3407
Washington, DC 20590
The Safety Compass can also be viewed at: http://safety.fhwa.dot.gov
Managing and Editor-in Chief
Susanna Hughes Reck
Your comments and highway safety related articles are welcomed. This newsletter is intended to be a source to increase highway safety awareness, information and provide resources to help save lives. You are encouraged to submit highway safety articles that might be of value to the highway safety community. Send your comments, questions and articles for review (electronically) to: firstname.lastname@example.org.
Please review guidelines for article submittals.
If you would like to be included on the distribution list to receive your free issues, please send your email address to: email@example.com.
By Keith Sinclair FHWA
The first annual meeting of the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Standing Committee on Highway Traffic Safety - Subcommittee on Safety Management (SCOHTS-SM) was held on September 20-22 in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. 112 highway safety practitioners from federal, state agencies and the private sector convened to initiate facilitation and implementation of multidisciplinary safety strategies in each state that will advance efforts toward reducing highway injuries and fatalities. 42 states were represented at the meeting.
Larry Tibbits, Chief Operations Officer of the Michigan Department of Transportation and SCOHTS-SM Chair, kicked off the meeting with opening remarks and was followed by John Fuller, Chief Engineer of the Oklahoma Department of Transportation, who welcomed the Subcommittee to Oklahoma. Pete Rahn, Director of the Missouri Department of Transportation and SCOHTS Chair, gave an impassioned welcoming to the subcommittee, encouraging SCOHTS-SM to press on in implementing new ideas and countermeasures.
A group discussion that took place at the meeting.
Rahn closed with an inspirational illustration that included the equation "Perfect Plans - Action = Squat." In other words, plans mean nothing if not followed up by action. Jeffrey Lindley, FHWA Associate Administrator for Safety, and Tony Kane, AASHTO Director of Engineering and Technical Services, also delivered opening remarks.
The Subcommittee established six task groups who met and initiated formulation of plans to:
The task groups will report to SCOHTS on these and other important safety related issues.
Each state was afforded 3 minutes to present the highlights of its Safety program along with a 2- page overview. The 2-page overviews are part of the meeting minutes and are posted on the SCOHTS-SM (http://www.transportation.org/?siteid=81) website. Recurring topics of the States' reports include:
The SCOHTS-SM will meet annually, with the next meeting scheduled for September 2007 in Portland, Oregon. The task groups will continue their work through periodic conference calls, web-conferences, and electronic correspondence throughout the year. If you would like more general information, please contact:
The next SCOHTS-SM annual meeting will be held in Portland, Oregon, September 2007.
Saving Lives - A Vital Goal
Improving Transportation for a Strong America
To continually improve highway safety by reducing the number of highway fatalities and serious injuries. Ensuring safe travel on highways is a guiding principle throughout the FHWA.
Improve safety performance through program delivery, technical assistance, research, training, data analysis, and public information. The FHWA works with safety partners to heighten safety awareness within the highway community, business, industry, and travelers.
Reducing roadway departure, intersections, and pedestrian fatalities and serious injuries.
by Dr. Ken Opiela, Federal Highway Administration
The FHWA staff at Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center (TFHRC) worked with the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (PennDOT) to conduct a two-phased effort aimed at understanding how varying pavement marking treatments affect driver performance. The first phase involved experiments with driving subjects in the FHWA’s instrumented field research vehicle. The second phase involved replicating the field experiments in the highway driving simulator (HDS) at TFHRC. PennDOT made a section of rural, two-lane road available for nighttime test runs and provided a contractor to apply the various pavement marking treatments over a three week period.
The field experiment took place on a six-mile segment of two-lane rural road. Sixteen drivers not familiar with the section of road were recruited as participants. Each participant drove the same road section in each direction at night in an instrumented vehicle eight times over a three-week period during which incremental changes were made to the pavement markings. These incremental changes included increasing the brightness of the centerline or adding wider edge lines. Detailed data was gathered for speed, lane position, and forces acting on the vehicle for each run, as well as driver ratings about the ease of driving each section of the road. Penn State University is collaborating on the data analysis and generating measurements for factors such as centerline or edge line encroachments, speed profiles and variance, and driver deceleration (braking) as indicators of the infl uence of the pavement markings treatments on safe driving behavior.
FHWA's Digital Highway Measurements Vehicle
The second part of the study involved the development of a computer model of the same road section using the detailed geometrics and roadside data gathered by the FHWA’s Digital Highway Measurements Vehicle. The detailed digital data not only provided an engineering quality description of road geometry, but also allowed for rapid creation of a digital model of the road for the driving simulator at TFHRC.
Another group of sixteen participants was recruited to drive the HDS representation of the road and experience the same set of pavement marking treatments. The HDS study captured driver performance measures and subjective ratings similar to those collected in the field. The validation exercises indicated a high level of correlation between driver performance measures for similar road sections between the field and HDS, which implied that the results are comparable. The success of the validation efforts provided confi dence that using the simulator could be a safe and cost-effective way to explore the effectiveness of other potential safety improvement treatments of interest to the DOT.
The researchers plowed through the mountain of data gathered in this study to analyze subjective and objective measures of performance.
The analysis of driver preference rankings from both the field and simulator studies led to the subjective fi nding that drivers favor more and brighter markings as they negotiate curves on two-lane rural roads at night.
The analysis of driver preference rankings from both the field and simulator studies led to the subjective fi nding that drivers favor more and brighter markings as they negotiate curves on two-lane rural roads at night. The analysis of objective data found that drivers were prone to drive 2-4 miles per hour faster with better markings on the same road. The analyses of lane positioning performance measures or combinations of measures failed to yield any strong conclusions on the nature of the pavement marking treatments. Continued analysis is planned to see if there may be useful insights gained by considering effects of pavement marking treatments on the tangents and curves. Further HDS studies are anticipated to assess the effects of modifi cations of the pavement marking treatments such as longer extension into tangent sections or greater use of roadside delineators.
An FHWA report integrating the results of the various contractor and staff efforts is planned, but the individual research papers and contractor reports are available upon request. For more information contact:
Dr. Ken Opiela
Roadway departure crashes cause 60% of all roadway fatalities and are the largest highway safety problem in the U.S. A high priority for Federal, state and local transportation agencies and other organizations; roadway departure crashes include:
Of the 43,443 highway fatalities in 2005, 25,473 were roadway departure fatalities.
Of those, 17,295 were single-vehicle ROR crashes, comprising 40% of all fatalities.
Eighty percent of ROR fatalities occur on rural roadways, with about 90% of these occurring on 2-lane roads (based on current available data).
In addition, there were almost 8,178 fatalities from head-on, opposite direction front to side, and opposite direction sideswipe crashes accounting for 19% of all fatalities in 2005.
Roadway departure crashes cause 60% of all roadway fatalities
Learn more about roadway departure crashes at: http://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/roadway_dept/
Local agencies own and operate over three quarters of the nation's public roadways. Over 60 percent of fatalities occur on rural roads (79 percent of the 60 percent fatalities are on local roads) even though they carry less then 40 percent of the VMT. In order to achieve meaningful safety results, we as a nation need to improve safety on local roadways. To assist with reducing fatalities and incapacitating injuries on local roads, the FHWA provides training tools and technical assistance to localities and tribal entities in a variety of ways. If you should have any questions, please contact Leslie Wright, Program Manager, at 202-366-2176. You may also see more information online at: http://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/local_rural/.
by Dr. Ken Opiela, Federal Highway Administration
Cable median barriers are being installed widely in response to the increasing frequency of cross median crashes on freeways with narrow medians. This has raised questions about the most appropriate placement of cable median barriers in sloping medians. While all the systems being installed have met the crashworthiness criteria in NCHRP Report 350, the cable barriers cannot often be installed on level terrain, as is used in the National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) 350 testing. Crash studies have shown that in there is potential for vehicles to override or underride cable median barriers in some placement confi gurations in medians with mild downslopes. Studies of North Carolina crash data have noted that certain small to medium sized vehicles are more prone to underride the barrier particularly if they have sloped front ends.
Upon validation of the model, simulations were conducted to evaluate the barrier’s safety performance under varying design and placement options, impact conditions, and vehicle types. The impact conditions investigated included impacts at 100 km/hour and at impact angles of 25 and 45 degrees, with small, medium, and large vehicles. Varying barrier post spacing, median geometry, post location, and cable tension were studied for impacts from both sides. The simulations revealed that the vehicle will underride the cable barrier in a down sloping median profi le when it is placed at a 4-foot offset beyond the invert of the median. Under these conditions, it was found that the front suspension of the vehicle is fully compressed at the time of impact with the barrier, thus limiting the contact with the cables permitting the vehicle to underride all three cables. Crash simulations with the posts placed one foot beyond the invert of the median did not show the same underride tendencies. Underriding was found to be more common for small and midsize sedans with sloped front ends.
Crash Test striking a North Carolina cable median barrier
Two full-scale crash tests were performed at the FOIL to confi rm the simulation fi ndings. The tests involved a Ford Crown Victoria sedan striking a North Carolina cable median barrier at 100km/hour and 25 degrees. In the first test, the cable median barrier was placed on a 6:1 sloped terrain with the posts at a 4-foot offset beyond the invert of the median. The vehicle underrode the barrier. In a similar test with the cable barrier placed 1 foot beyond the invert of the sloped median the vehicle was contained and redirected. These results validated the simulation analyses and indicated that the finite element model can be used to analyze cable median barrier design and placement options.
This research concluded that the effectiveness of low tension, three strand cable median barriers is infl uenced by their positioning in the median. Additional computer analyses are underway in a second research project to develop retrofi t treatments and to analyze alternative placement designs for cable median barriers for various median cross sections. It is expected that the research report will be released in December 2006.
Dr. Ken Opiela
The objectives of the National Crash Analysis Center (NCAC) effort were to:
- Develop a finite element model for a typical low-tension cable median barrier
- Validate the model by comparison to previously conducted crash tests
- Apply the model to evaluate the effectiveness of cable barriers varying placements within the median cross sections, and
- Confirm the modeling results with full scale crash tests. A finite element model of low-tension, three-strand cable median barrier was developed and validated by comparing crash simulation results to test data from the similar Washington State design.
Highway Safety and Trees - The Delicate Balance
FHWA has a new DVD titled "Highway Safety and Trees - The Delicate Balance." It is designed to educate the publicon the real hazards caused by trees located adjacent to the roadway, and on the variety of options available to reduce this toll. It stresses the importance of communication between highway agencies and the public, and the involvement of Context Sensitive Design/Solutions in developing highway projects that fully and objectively consider safety as well as other community concerns. In short, it is intended to help gain public acceptance of highway projects that include reducing tree crashes as an element of the project goals.
Safer Sign Supports - Are Yours Breakaway Yet
This brochure advocates the replacement of rigid sign poles with breakaway supports in compliance with the MUTCD. Signs along highways posted 50 mph or greater need to be upgraded by 2013, but signs on lower speed highways can be replaced when obsolete signs faces are being upgraded. For more information contact:
Both DVD and brochures are ready for distribution and are available FREE of charge by contacting:
Product Distribution Center (PDC) ARTI
9701 Philadelphia Ct. Suite Q
Lanham, MD 20706-4436
Email: firstname.lastname@example.org or Fax: 301-577-1421
Ask for product numbers:
FHWA-SA-06-12 (Brochure announcing Trees DVD)
FHWA-SA-06-13 (for the Trees DVD)
FHWA-SA-06-14 (for the Signs brochure)
New! Updated Pedestrian and Bicycle Crash Analysis (PBCAT) Tool
PBCAT version 2.0 is a software application designed to assist state and local pedestrian and bicycle coordinators, planners, and engineers in addressing pedestrian and bicyclist crash problems. PBCAT accomplishes this goal by enabling users to develop a database of details associated with crashes between motor vehicles and pedestrians or bicyclists. One of these details is crash type, which describes the pre-crash actions of the involved parties. After developing a database of crash information, PBCAT users can analyze the data, produce reports, and select countermeasures to address the problems identified by the software.
PBCAT Version 2.0 includes signifi cant improvements in functionality and has an enhanced design that makes the software easier to use. Find out more about the new features and download PBCAT Version 2.0 at: www.walkinginfo.org/pc/pbcat.htm.
RSAs Making Roads Safer FHWA's Office of Safety has a new Road Safety Audit Peer-to- Peer Program (RSA P2P). The P2P program puts agencies in touch with transportation professionals across the country who can address questions that might arise when an agency is considering performing an RSA, or is conducting an RSA for the first time.
The RSA P2P program is provided at no cost to state, local, and tribal governments and offers the opportunity to receive first hand information and lessons learned from their peers who are successfully performing RSAs. Assistance can also include a site visit as needed.
For assistance, call 866-P2P-FHWA or send an email to SafetyP2P@fhwa.dot.gov.
For information on other RSA resources, contact Louisa Ward, RSA Program Manager at Ph: 202-366-2218 or Louisa.Ward@dot.gov, or Craig Allred, FHWA Resource Center, at Ph: 720-963-3236 or Craig.Allred@dot.gov.
You may also find additional information at: http://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/rsa/.
Highway Safety Improvement Program "Five Percent Report"
The Federal Highway Administration recently posted reports required by the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Effi cient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU). The "5 percent report", an element of the new Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP), requires states to submit an annual report describing not less than fi ve percent of their highway locations exhibiting the most severe highway safety needs.
In addition to identifying the locations, the reports include potential remedies to the hazardous locations identifi ed, estimated costs of the remedies, and impediments to implementation of the remedies other than costs.
These reports will help raise public awareness of the highway safety needs and challenges in the states. "The reports are important to better understand the safety challenges each state faces, and to encourage public discussion and action," noted Jeff Lindley, FHWA Associate Administrator for Safety. "With the death toll over 43,000, we must commit to strategies available today, and be aggressive in finding new approaches for tomorrow to save lives."
The Five Percent Reports are available at: http://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/hsip/fivepercent/
The reports represent a variety of methods utilized, and various degrees of road coverage. More information about the program, including the guidance provided by FHWA to the states, may be found at: http://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/safetealu/guides/guide040506.cfm.
Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP)
The new Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) requirements have made it a busy year for State DOT's. Many States have already completed their SHSP development and are moving on to implementation. To date, FHWA has approved the development process for 28 plans. FHWA would like to make these plans available to all states by creating a collection of SHSP web links on the FHWA Safety website (http://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/) in the near future. For more information, or for posting your state's SHSP web link, please contact Erin Kenley by email: email@example.com.
Safe Routes to School State Coordinators hold National Meeting
Safe Routes to School (SRTS) State Coordinators gathered in Washington, D.C., from July 31 - August 2 for their program's first national meeting. The State Coordinators will oversee the distribution of $612 million authorized over the next fi ve years to fund SRTS programs. Forty-one states and the District of Columbia were represented.
Coordinators discussed program plans, application procedures, evaluation issues, and heard about example programs. The National SRTS Program is administered by FHWA with the assistance of the National Center for Safe Routes to School (NCSRTS), which is led by the University of North Carolina Highway Safety Research Center in partnership with AASHTO, GHSA, ITE, America Walks and Toole Design Group.
For more information, please visit www.saferoutesinfo.org.
|January 17-19||Arlington, VA||NCUTCD
|January 21-27||Washington, DC||TRB 86th
|January 26-30||San Antonio, TX||ATSSA
36th Annual Convention and Traffic Expo
|January 31-February 4||Washington, DC||NSA
National Sheriffs Association Mid-Winter Conf.
|February 26-28||San Diego, CA||Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP)
|March 14-16||Washington, DC||National Bike Summit
|March 25-27||Chicago, IL||Lifesavers 25th National Conference
|March 25-28||San Diego, CA||ITE 2007
Technical Conference and Exhibit
|April 2-6||Kick-Off Site - TBD||National Work Zone Awareness Week|
|April 22-26||Milwaukee, WI||NACE
National Association of Counties & Eng.
|April 29-May 2||Branson, MO||AASHTO
Standing Committee on Highway Traffic Safety (SCOHTS)
|June 4-6||Palm Springs, CA||ITS
America's 2007 Annual Meeting & Exposition
|June 23-27||Salt Lake City, UT||NSA
National Sheriffs Association Annual Conference
|June 25-29||Baltimore, MD||National FHWA Safety &
Operations Leadership Conference
(Open ONLY to federal employees)