U.S. Department of Transportation
Federal Highway Administration
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Washington, DC 20590
202-366-4000
FHWA's RSPCB Peer-to-Peer Program (P2P) supports and sponsors peer exchanges and workshops hosted by agencies.
Date
May 31 – June 1, 2012
Hosts
Colorado Local Technical Assistance Program
Key Participants
Representatives from:
Colorado
Iowa
Kansas
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
North Dakota
South Dakota
Wyoming
FHWA Office of Safety
U.S. DOT Volpe Center
FHWA's Office of Safety sponsors P2P events.
Learn more
This report provides a summary of the proceedings of the Local Road Safety Peer Exchange held in Denver, Colorado from May 31 to June 1, 2012. The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) sponsored the Peer Exchange in coordination with Region 7 Local and Tribal Technical Assistance Program. Region 7 states include: Colorado, Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota, and Wyoming. The goal of the Peer Exchange was to facilitate the exchange of information on local road safety and explore opportunities for greater coordination and communication between FHWA, State Departments of Transportation (DOTs), Local Technical Assistance Program Centers (LTAPs), Tribal Technical Assistance Program Centers (TTAPs), and local officials/practitioners within the States in the region. The Peer Exchange covered four key topics:
Representatives from all Region 7 states participated in the event (see Appendix A for the complete participant list). Participants from each State were charged with developing action plans at the end of the workshop for their respective states to address the four key topics noted above. The action plans identify objectives to address each issue, as well as resources and champions to achieve those objectives.
The format of the Peer Exchange consisted of peer presentations on noteworthy practices, followed by breakout sessions and action planning on each of the four key topics (see Appendix B for the agenda).
Following each presentation session breakout groups consisting of a mix of representatives from different organizations were formed to discuss the topic. Groups were then convened by State to develop action plans to address local and rural road safety in their respective states. Action plans included:
The Division Administrator of the FHWA Colorado Division Office welcomed participants to the Peer Exchange and discussed FHWA safety goals, programs and opportunities. He emphasized FHWA's commitment to reducing the disproportionate share of fatalities and serious injuries that take place on rural roads through data-driven approaches to safety planning and investment.
The FHWA Office of Safety Local and Rural Road Safety Program Manager provided an overview of the workshop event and asked participants to introduce themselves and share their expectations. Expectations included:
The first peer presentations covered the topic of Safety Data Collection and Analysis. Discussion focused on practices used by States to improve local road safety data collection, make local data more accessible and support the analysis of local data.
Nebraska: Local Roads Volume Data Collection
Representatives from the Nebraska LTAP and the Nebraska Department of Roads (NDOR) provided an overview of local road safety data collection activities and issues in Nebraska. NDOR is pursuing several initiatives to enhance local roads data collection:
Iowa: Local Road Data Collection and Analysis
Representatives from the Iowa LTAP described road safety data collection and analysis activities in Iowa. The Iowa Department of Transportation (IDOT) collects 80 percent of crash data electronically. Electronic data collection was made possible through a grant from Iowa's Safety Bureau, which allowed IDOT to purchase dashboard laptops for local law enforcement agencies. IDOT is now working to enhance data accessibility and analysis and is pursuing research on various safety countermeasures. Notable efforts currently underway in Iowa include:
FHWA: Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP)
The FHWA Office of Safety HSIP Program Manager gave an overview of the HSIP, a core Federal-aid program that can be used for infrastructure-related safety improvements on all public roads. HSIP is a Federally-funded, State-administered program. The program supports strategic safety planning, data-driven roadway safety management, and infrastructure-related safety improvements. HSIP funds both site-level and systemic infrastructure investments identified in the SHSP.
HSIP includes several programs
FHWA encourages State and local officials to use a systemic approach to identify and address roadway safety issues. A systemic approach uses statewide data to associate different types and frequencies of crashes with different types and characteristics of transportation facilities. The approach allows States to address safety issues in a more proactive and cost-effective manner.
The HSIP Program Manager noted that LTAP/TTAPs can play an important role in helping local officials identify and develop safety projects and apply for HSIP and HRRRP funding. FHWA provides a variety of resources including web-based training, tools, manuals and peer exchanges that can help LTAP/TTAPs guide locals to HSIP funding.
Table 1 summarizes the result of facilitated discussions on challenges and effective strategies associated with improving local road safety data collection and analysis.
Table 1. Local Road Safety Data Collection and Analysis - Challenges and Noteworthy Practices
Topic | Challenges | Noteworthy Practices |
---|---|---|
Data |
|
|
Participants then heard from their peers regarding strategies to improve local involvement in strategic highway safety planning activities.
Montana: Outreach to Locals
The Assistant Public Works Director for Lewis and Clark County in Montana described the role locals play in Montana's SHSP process. Montana Department of Transportation (MDT) develops two safety planning documents with local support:
Local officials participate in the CHSP planning process, but they face challenges identifying safety risks because they have limited access to data and lack the ability or funding to analyze data. Montana has recently started developing smaller county and community safety plans.
The Montana LTAP/TTAP plays a role in assisting locals improve transportation safety. Significant efforts of the Montana LTAP/TTAP include:
Kansas: Local Coalitions
Representatives from the Kansas DOT (KDOT) and LTAP described several safety practices that were of great interest to peer exchange participants.
Breakout Groups
Table 2 summarizes the result of facilitated discussions on the challenges of local agency involvement in the SHSP process, strategies to address challenges and priorities.
Table 2. Local Agency involvement in the SHSP - Challenges and Noteworthy Practices
Topic | Challenges | Noteworthy Practices |
---|---|---|
SHSP |
|
|
The next set of peer presentations focused on how agencies are improving utilization of the HSIP for projects that address local safety issues.
Missouri: Local Involvement in HSIP
A traffic safety engineer from the Missouri Department of Transportation (MoDOT) discussed MoDOT's approach to safety. Traffic fatalities in Missouri peaked in 2005 and have since declined. Traffic fatality rates in Missouri are now less than the national average. MoDOT has identified 14 counties in Missouri where two-thirds of the fatalities on local roads have occurred. Many of those fatalities occur at curves and local intersections. In response, MoDOT has adopted a data-driven approach to addressing local safety. Two effective efforts were highlighted:
The presenter described MoDOT's approach to one priority corridor, US 54, where MoDOT is redesigning high-risk intersections.
Wyoming: Rural Road Safety Program
A program manager from Wyoming Department of Transportation (WYDOT) described how Wyoming uses HRRRP to fund local safety projects. Wyoming LTAP has worked with WYDOT to develop and implement a methodology to identify, fund and administer local safety projects. The methodology uses ten years of crash data and the results of windshield surveys to develop weighting factors for the roadway environment. The factors are combined into crash and geometric ratings which are then used to prioritize high-risk sites. The methodology has helped WYDOT identify low-cost and high-impact projects like signs, striping, rumble strips and delineation projects. For example, Wyoming has used HRRRP funding to implement a statewide sign program to fund new safety signs for local agencies.
Colorado: Allocating Funds to Locals
Representatives from Colorado DOT (CDOT) explained how CDOT helps local agencies access HSIP funding. CDOT helps local agencies access HSIP funding through a streamlined application process that uses a one page application form. Local agencies provide CDOT with the location's accident history, a description of the proposed project, and the estimated timing and cost of the proposed project. CDOT then analyzes the crash data for that locality. They use the safety performance function methodology to determine high-crash locations and perform benefit-cost analysis to determine which projects should be funded. CDOT has funded a variety of intersection and roadway segment improvements for municipalities using this methodology.
Breakout Groups
Table 3 summarizes the result of facilitated discussions on the challenges of local agency involvement in the HSIP process and strategies to address challenges and priorities.
Table 3. Local Agency Participation in the HSIP - Challenges and Noteworthy Practices
Topic | Challenges | Noteworthy Practices |
---|---|---|
HSIP |
|
|
The final peer discussion topic focused on interagency collaboration and coordination. Participants discussed ways to improve communication and enhance cooperation among local and state agencies.
LTAP Safety Program Performance
Representatives from the FHWA Technology Transfer Partnership Program presented an overview of the activities and accomplishments of LTAP/TTAP Centers across the country. LTAP/TTAPs provide technical assistance to local agencies in four general areas: safety, workforce development, worker safety, and infrastructure management. The current efforts of the LTAP/TTAPs align with many of the priorities of FHWA and the needs of local safety officials expressed by LTAP/TTAP representatives at the Peer Exchange. The evaluation data collected by the LTAP/TTAP clearinghouse demonstrate that there are further opportunities to increase support for including:
Breakout Group
Table 4 summarizes the result of facilitated discussions on the challenges, opportunities and noteworthy practices associated with collaboration and coordination between agencies for improving local road safety.
Table 4. Local Road Safety Collaboration and Coordination - Challenges and Noteworthy Practices
Topic | Challenges | Noteworthy Practices |
---|---|---|
Coordination |
|
|
Each State group was tasked with developing an overall Action Plan encompassing the strategies they had identified to improve their local road safety program, resources to be employed in the implementation of identified strategies and a champion to assist in moving forward. Representatives from each State reported out to the group the results of their action planning sessions.
Key actions included:
In their evaluations, many participants stated that they particularly appreciated the opportunity to get to know each other better and exchange ideas. However, several suggested that greater involvement from FHWA Division Offices or local agencies would have been valuable. Participants were excited to learn about innovative strategies adopted in other States such as local safety coalitions and State/Federal funding exchanges. They wanted to learn more about how to:
Many participants planned to implement the new ideas they learned at the peer exchange in their own States. Most importantly, participants were able to work together across agencies to develop action plans for their respective States.
1 Under MAP-21, the High Risk Rural Road Program set-aside is eliminated.
FHWA/Volpe | |
---|---|
Rosemarie Anderson Transportation Specialist FHWA Office of Safety Business Phone Number: (202) 366-5007 Business Email: Rosemarie.Anderson@dot.gov |
Aaron Jette Community Planner Volpe/US DOT Business Phone Number: (617) 494-2335 Business Email: aaron.jette@dot.gov |
David Cough Assistant Division Administrator FHWA – Wyoming Division Office Business Phone Number: (307) 771-2941 Business Email: David.Cough@dot.gov |
Susan Monahan LTAP/TTAP Coordinator FHWA – LTAP Clearinghouse Business Phone Number: (202) 289-4434 Business Email: smonahan@artba.org |
Dahir Egal Safety & Traffic Engineer/Operations Engineer FHWA – Colorado Division Office Business Phone Number: (720) 963-3007 Business Email: dahir.egal@dot.gov |
Karen Scurry Transportation Specialist FHWA – Office of Safety Business Phone Number: (609) 637-4207 Business Email: karen.scurry@dot.gov |
Cameron R Ishaq Office of Technical Services FHWA/Technology Partnership Programs Business Phone Number: (703) 235-0525 Business Email: Cameron.ishaq@fasterhorse.com |
Jeffrey Zaharewicz LTAP/TTAP Program Manager FHWA/Technology Partnership Programs Business Phone Number: (703) 235-0991 Business Email: jeffrey.zaharewicz@dot.gov |
Hillary Isebrands Safety Engineer FHWA – Resource Center Business Phone Number: (720) 963-3222 Business Email: hillary.isebrands@dot.gov |
|
Colorado | |
Bryan Allery Traffic Engineer – HQ Colorado DOT – HQ Traffic Engineering Business Phone Number: (303) 757-9967 Business Email: Bryan.Allery@dot.state.co.us |
Ron Hall CSU TTAP Director Business Phone Number: (800) 262-7623 Business Email: Ron.Hall@business.colostate.edu |
Shane Chevalier Traffic Engineer – HQ Colorado DOT – HQ Traffic Engineering Business Phone Number: (303) 512-5109 Business Email: Shane.Chevalier@dot.state.co.us |
Lindsay Marshall Training Coordinator Colorado LTAP Business Phone Number: (303) 735-3530 Business Email: cltap@colorado.edu |
Charles Meyer, P.E. Safety & Traffic Engineering Manager Colorado Department of Transportation Business Phone Number: (303) 757-9879 Business Email: Charles.E.Meyer@dot.state.co.us |
Martina Wilkinson Traffic Engineer Larimer County Business Phone Number: (970) 498-5731 Business Email: mwilkinson@larimer.org |
Renée Railsback Colorado LTAP Director Business Phone Number: (303) 735-3530 Business Email: cltap@colorado.edu |
|
Iowa | |
Tom McDonald Iowa LTAP Safety Circuit Rider Business Phone Number: (515) 294-6384 Business Email: tmcdonal@iastate.edu |
Keith Knapp Director Iowa LTAP Business Phone Number: (515) 294-8817 Business Email: kknapp@iastate.edu |
Kansas | |
Lynn C. Berges, PE Traffic Safety Engineer KDOT – Bureau of Local Projects Business Phone Number: (785) 296-3861 Business Email: Lynn.Berges@ksdot.org |
Patricia Weaver Associate Director of Outreach and Technology Transfer Transportation Research Institute – University of Kansas Business Phone Number: (785) 864-2595 Business Email: weaver@ku.edu |
Norm Bowers Local Road Engineer Kansas Association of Counties Business Phone Number: (785) 272-2585 Ext. 314 Business Email: bowers@kansascounties.org |
|
Missouri | |
John P. Miller, P.E. Traffic Safety Engineer Missouri Department of Transportation Business Phone Number: (573) 526-1759 Business Email: John.P.Miller@MoDOT.mo.gov |
Larry Benz Director Cole County Dept. of Public Works Business Phone Number: (573) 636-3614 Business Email: lbenz@colecounty.org |
Montana | |
Kyle Thomas Assistant Public Works Director Lewis & Clark County Business Phone Number: (406) 447-8036 Business Email: kthomas@co.lewis-clark.mt.us |
|
Nebraska | |
Bill Bivin Program Coordinator Nebraska LTAP Business Phone Number: (402) 472-2180 Business Email: wbivin2@unlnotes.unl.edu |
Dennis Smith Senior Program Coordinator Nebraska LTAP Business Phone Number: (402) 472-5748 Business Email: dsmith20@unl.edu |
Dan Cady Director Nebraska LTAP Business Phone Number: (402) 472-1226 Business Email: dcady1@unl.edu |
Dan Waddle, P.E. Traffic Engineer Nebraska Department of Roads Business Phone Number: (402) 479-4594 Business Email: Dan.Waddle@nebraska.gov |
Steve Mika County Highway Superintendent Nebraska LTAP – Saunders County, NE Business Phone Number: (402) 443-8172 Business Email: smika@co.saunders.ne.us |
|
North Dakota | |
Bryon Fuchs Transportation Engineer III North Dakota DOT Business Phone Number: (701) 328-2516 Business Email: blfuchs@nd.gov |
Darcy Rosendahl North Dakota LTAP Program Manager Business Phone Number: (701) 328-9857 Business Email: darcy.rosendahl@ndsu.edu |
South Dakota | |
Nicole Frankl South Dakota DOT Assistant Traffic Safety Engineer Business Phone Number: (605) 773-4421 Business Email: Nicole.Frankl@state.sd.us |
Ken Skorseth Program Manager SDLTAP Business Phone Number: (605) 690-8368 Business Email: ken.skorseth@sdstate.edu |
Cliff Reuer South Dakota LTAP Safety & Civil Engineering Technician Business Phone Number: (605) 773-5108 Business Email: cliff.reuer@state.sd.us |
|
Wyoming | |
Matt Carlson, P.E. Program Manager Wyoming Department of Transportation Business Phone Number: (307) 777-4450 Business Email: matt.carlson@dot.state.wy.us |
Debbie Shinstine Wyoming LTAP LTAP Research Engineer Business Phone Number: (307) 742-2364 Business Email: dshinsti@uwyo.edu |
Thursday, May 31, 2012 | |
---|---|
8:00 am | Registration/Coffee |
8:15 am | Welcoming Remarks (John Cater, CO FHWA Division Administrator) Workshop Overview (Rosemarie Anderson, FHWA Office of Safety) |
8:30 am | Participant Introductions |
9:00 am | Presentations - Data Collection on Local Roads
|
10:00 am | Break |
10:15 am | Breakout Groups – Improving Local Road Data Collection and Analysis |
11:45 am | Lunch |
12:30 pm | Presentations – Strategic Highway Safety Plans
|
1:15 pm | Breakout Groups – SHSP and Local Involvement Challenges |
2:45 pm | Break |
3:00 pm | Presentations - Highway Safety Improvement Program
|
3:45 pm | Breakout Groups – HSIP Project Selection and Implementation |
5:00 pm | Wrap Up and Adjourn |
Friday, June 1, 2012 | |
8:00 am | Welcome and Logistics |
8:15 am | Recap from Day 1 |
8:45 am | Roundup of LTAP Safety Data Program Performance
|
9:15 am | Breakout Groups – Challenges and Opportunities with Collaboration |
10:00 am | Break |
10:15 am | Report Out |
10:45 am | Lessons Learned – Action Plans |
11:15 am | Report Out and Next Steps |
12:00 pm | Wrap Up and Adjourn |