U.S. Department of Transportation
Federal Highway Administration
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Washington, DC 20590
202-366-4000


Skip to content
FacebookYouTubeTwitterFlickrLinkedIn

Safety

eSubscribe
eSubscribe Envelope

FHWA Home / Safety / Intersection / Signalized Intersections: An Informational Guide

Signalized Intersections: An Informational Guide

REFERENCES

  1. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT), 2009.
  2. Transportation Research Board (TRB). Highway Capacity Manual 2010. Washington, DC: TRB, National Research Council (NRC), 2010.
  3. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets. Washington, DC: AASHTO, 2011.
  4. FHWA. Safety and Operations Electronic Reading Room. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/tfhrc/safety/intro.cfm. Accessed May 2004.
  5. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration(NHTSA).  Traffic Safety Facts 2002:  A Compilation of Motor Vehicle Crash Data from the Fatality Analysis Reporting System and the General Estimates System. Washington, DC: USDOT, 2003.
  6. Rodegerdts, L., et al., NCHRP Report 672: Roundabouts: An Informational Guide, Second Edition. Washington, D.C.: Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, 2010.
  7. Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Public Law 226, 101st Congress. July 26, 1990.
  8. U.S. Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board (U.S. Access Board). Proposed Accessibility Guidelines for Pedestrian Facilities in the Public Right-of-Way, July 26, 2011.
  9. FHWA, Driver Expectancy in Highway Design and Operations. FHWA-TO-86-1. Washington, DC: USDOT, May 1986.
  10. Institute for Transportation Engineers (ITE). Traffic Safety Toolbox: A Primer on Traffic Safety. Washington, DC: ITE. 1999.
  11. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). Highway Safety Manual, 1st Edition. Washington, DC: AASHTO, 2010.
  12. Smiley, A., C. MacGreger, and R. Dewar.  Evaluation of Prototype Highway Tourist Signs for Ontario.  Prepared by Human Factors North for the Ontario Ministry of Transportation, Research and Development Branch. Ontario, Canada: June 1996.
  13. Eby, D. and L. Kostyniuk.  Estimating Driving Task Demand from Crash Probabilities: A Review of the Literature and Assessment of Crash Databases. 2004. http://www.volpe.dot.gov/coi/hfrsa/work/roadway/saveit/docs/dec04/litrev_2a.pdf
  14. Treat, J., N. Tumbas, S. McDonald, D. Shinar, R. Hume, R. Mayer, R. Stansfin, and N. Castellen. Tri-level Study of the Causes of Traffic Accidents. Report No. DOT-HS-034-3-535-77 (TAC), Indiana, 1977.
  15. Staplin, L., K. Lococo, S. Byington, and D. Harkey. Highway Design Handbook for Older Drivers and Pedestrians. Report No. FHWA-RD-01-103. Washington, DC: USDOT, 2001.
  16. FHWA. Young Drivers and Highway Design and Operations: Findings and Recommended Research. Report No. FHWA-RD-01-120. Washington DC: USDOT, FHWA, 2001
  17. Bureau of Transportation Statistics. National Transportation Statistics 2010. "Table 1-11: Number of U.S. Aircraft, Vehicles, Vessels, and Other Conveyances." Washington, DC: USDOT, RITA, 2010.
  18. Fatality Analysis Reporting System. "Fatality Facts 2009: Pedestrians." http://www.iihs.org/research/fatality.aspx?topicName=Pedestrians&year=2009  
  19. Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, Fatality Facts, Passenger Vehicles.
  20. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. Highway Safety Manual (2010), Table 10-6.
  21. Slack, K., NCHRP Report 500: Guidance for Implementation of the AASHTO Strategic Highway Safety Plan. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, 2000.
  22. NHTSA. Traffic Safety Facts 2008.
  23. Mohamedshad, Y., L. Chen, and F. Council. Association of Selected Intersection Factors with Red-Light-Running Crashes. Report No. FHWA-RD-00-12. Washington, DC: USDOT, 2000.
  24. NHTSA. Traffic Safety Factors. "Distracted Driving 2009."  DOT HS 811 379.  Washington, DC.  2010, p. 11.
  25. Sing, S. Distracted Driving and Driver, Roadway, and Environmental Factors. Report No. DOT HS 811 380, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.  Washington, DC.  2010, p. 12.
  26. AASHTO. Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities, 4th Edition. Washington, DC: AASHTO, 2012.
  27. FHWA. Selecting Roadway Design Treatments to Accommodate Bicycles. Report No. FHWA-RD-92-073. Washington, DC: USDOT, FHWA, January 1994.
  28. Pein, W. E. Trail Intersection Design Guidelines. Prepared for State Bicycle/Pedestrian Program, State Safety Office, Florida Department of Transportation. Highway Safety Research Center, University of North Carolina. September 1996.
  29. Danish Road Directorate. Collection of Cycle Concepts. Copenhagen, Denmark: Road Directorate: 2000.
  30. USDOT, Pedestrian and Bicycle Information Center, "How Many Bicyclists are Killed and Injured Each Year?" web page. http://www.bicyclinginfo.org/faqs/answer.cfm?id=40  
  31. NHTSA. NHTSA Traffic Safety Facts 2009, "Bicyclists and Other Cyclists."  Report No. DOT HS 811 386. Washington, DC:  2010.
  32. FHWA. Injuries to Pedestrians and Bicyclists: An Analysis Based on Hospital Emergency Department Data. Report No. FHWA-RD-99-078. Washington, DC: USDOT, 1999.
  33. FHWA. Pedestrian and Bicycle Crash Types of the Early 1990s. Report No. FHWA-RD-95-163. Washington, DC: USDOT, 1995.
  34. FHWA. Summary of Travel Trends: 2009 National Household Travel Survey. "Table 7. Average Annual Person Trips Per Household by Mode of Transportation and MSA Size 1977, 1983, 1990, and 1995 NPTS, and 2001 and 2009 NHTS." Report No. FHWA-PL-ll-022, Washington, DC: USDOT, FHWA, 2011, p. 16.
  35. Fruin, J. J. Pedestrian Planning and Design. New York: Metro Association of Urban Designers and Environmental Planning, 1971.
  36. U.S. Department of Justice. ADA Standards for Accessible Design (ADAAG). 2010.
  37. Kirschbaum, J. B., P. W. Axelson, P.E. Longmuir, K. M. Mispagel, J. A. Stein, and D. A. Yamada. Designing Sidewalks and Trails for Access, Part II of II: Best Practices Design Guide. Report No. FHWA-EP-01-127. Washington, DC: USDOT, September 2001.
  38. Zegeer, C.V., C. Seiderman, P. Lagerway, M. Cynecki, M. Ronkin, and R. Schneider. Pedestrian Facilities Users Guide—Providing Safety and Mobility. Report No. FHWA-RD-01-102. Washington, DC: USDOT, FHWA, 2002.
  39. Leaf, W.A., and D.F. Preusser. Literature Review on Vehicle Travel Speeds and Pedestrian Injuries. Report No. DOT-HS-809-021. Washington, DC: USDOT, October 1999.
  40. Florida Department of Transportation, Florida Pedestrian Planning and Design Handbook, April 1999.
  41. Taoka, G.T. "Statistical Evaluation of Brake Reaction Time," Compendium of Technical Papers, 52nd Annual Meeting of ITE, Chicago, IL, pp. 30-36, August 1982.
  42. ITE. Trip Generation Manual, 8th Edition: An ITE Informational Report. Washington, DC: 2008.
  43. Minnesota Department of Transportation. "Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE)." Technical Memorandum No. 07-02-T-01, March 20, 2007, p 2.  http://dotapp7.dot.state.mn.us/edms/download?docId=700081
  44. ITE. ITE Traffic Engineering Handbook, 6th edition. W.H. Kraft, ed. Washington, D.C.: ITE, 2009.
  45. Bonneson, J. and M. Fontaine. NCHRP Report 457: Evaluating Intersection Improvements: An Engineering Study Guide. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, 2010
  46. Woodson, W.E., B. Tillman, and P. Tillman. Human Factors Design Handbook: Information and Guidelines for the Design of Systems, Facilities, Equipment, and Products for Human Use, Second Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1992.
  47. Gattis, J. L., and S. T. Low. Intersection Angle Geometry and the Driver's Field of View. Final Technical Report 1073. University of Arkansas, March 1998, p. 38.
  48. AASHTO. Guide for the Planning, Design, and Operation of Pedestrian Facilities. 1st Edition. Washington, DC: AASHTO, 2004.
  49. FHWA. Federal Lands Highway Project Development and Design Manual. "Chapter 9. Highway Design." Draft. August 2012. http://flh.fhwa.dot.gov/resources/manuals/pddm/
  50. University of North Carolina Highway Safety Research Center.  Florida Pedestrian Planning and Design Handbook.  Florida Department of Transportation: April 1999.
  51. City of Portland (Oregon). City of Portland Pedestrian Design Guide. Portland, OR: Office of Transportation, June 1998. 
  52. FHWA. Memorandum on ADAAG Detectable Warnings. May 6, 2002. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/bicycle_pedestrian/guidance/accessibility_guidance/dwm.cfm
  53. U.S. Department of Justice. ADA Standards for Accessible Design, "Chapter 7. Communication Elements and Features," Figure 705.1 Size and Spacing of Truncated Domes. Washington, DC: 2010.
  54. U.S. Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board (U.S. Access Board). Proposed Accessibility Guidelines for Pedestrian Facilities in the Public Right-of-Way, July 26, 2011.
  55. FHWA. Alternative Intersections/Interchanges: Informational Report (AIIR). Report No. FHWA-HRT-09-060, Washington, DC: USDOT, FHWA, 2010. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/safety/09060/
  56. Seymour, E., J. Green, and J. Black. "The Permitted Lead-Lag Left-Turn Display." In 1994 Compendium of Technical Papers, ITE, 64th Annual Meeting, La Jolla, CA, 1994.
  57. Wainwright, W.S. "Tricks of the Trade: How to Get More Capacity at Your Signalized Intersections, at Low Cost and Without Compromising Safety." In 2003 Annual Meeting and Exhibit, CD Compendium, ITE, 73rd Annual Meeting, Seattle, WA, August 24-27, 2003.
  58. FHWA. Alternative Intersections/Interchanges: Informational Report (AIIR). Report No. FHWA-HRT-09-060, Washington, DC: USDOT, FHWA, 2010. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/safety/09060/
  59. Bentzen, B.L., and L.S. Tabor.  Accessible Pedestrian Signals.  Document A-37. Washington, DC: U.S. Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board (U.S. Access Board), 1998.
  60. Barlow, J.M., B.L. Bentzen, and L.S. Tabor. "Accessible Pedestrian Signals: Synthesis and Guide to Best Practice." Research Results Digest Number 278.. Washington, DC: NCHRP, July 2003.
  61. Noyce, D.A., and J.M. Barlow. Interfacing Accessible Pedestrian Signals (APS) with Traffic Signal Control Equipment. Washington, DC: U.S. Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board (U.S. Access Board), April 2003.
  62. AASHTO.  Roadside Design Guide.  Washington, DC: AASHTO, 2002.
  63. Missouri DOT.  Engineering Policy Guide, Section 902.5.37.3. Jefferson City, MO, http://epg.modot.mo.gov
  64. Kell, J.H., and I.J. Fullerton. Manual of Traffic Signal Design, 2nd edition. Washington, DC: ITE, 1998.
  65. Bonneson, J.A., and P.T. McCoy. Manual of Traffic Detector Design, 1st edition. Washington, DC: ITE, 1994.
  66. FHWA. Traffic Signal Timing Manual. Report No. FHWA-HOP-08-024. Washington, DC: USDOT, FHWA, June 2008.
  67. Wortman, R.H., and T.C. Fox. "A Reassessment of the Traffic Signal Change Interval." In Transportation Research Record 1069 (1986).
  68. ITE. Traffic Control Devices Handbook, J.L. Pline, ed. Washington, DC: ITE, 2001.
  69. ITE. Traffic Signing Handbook. Washington, DC: ITE, 1997.
  70. Illuminating Engineering Society of North America (IESNA).  American National Standard Practice for Roadway Lighting.  Standard RP-8-00.  June 2000 (Reaffirmed 2005).
  71. Antonucci, N.D., K.K. Hardy, K.L. Slack, et al. NCHRP Report 500 Volume 12: Guidance for Implementation of the AASHTO Strategic Highway Safety Plan. Washington, D.C.: Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, 2004.
  72. FHWA. FHWA Road Safety Audit Guidelines. Report No. FHWA-SA-06-06. Washington, DC: USDOT, FHWA, 2006.
  73. ITE. Statistical Evaluation in Traffic Safety Studies. Washington, DC: ITE, 1999.
  74. USDOT. Model Minimum Uniform Crash Criteria Guideline, Third Edition. Washington, DC: USDOT, 2008.
  75. Alexander, G. Positive Guidance in Maryland: Guidelines and Case Studies. Maryland State Highway Administration, 1997.
  76. FHWA. Retroreflective Borders on Traffic Sgnal Backplates: A South Carolina Success Story.  Report No. FHWA-SA-09-011.  Washington, DC: USDOT, 2009. 
  77. FHWA. Safety Evaluation of Advance Street Name Signs. Report No. FHWA-HRT-09-029.  Washington, DC: USDOT, 2009.
  78. FHWA. Crash Modifications Factors (CMF) Clearinghouse. http://www.cmfclearinghouse.org/
  79. Hauer, E. Observational Before - After Studies in Road Safety. Elsevier Science Ltd., Oxford, UK: 1997.
  80. TRB. Highway Capacity Manual, Special Report 209. Washington, DC: TRB, 1985.
  81. Chang, G.L., J. Joseph.  Empirical Investigation of Intersection Traffic Patterns Under Maryland Driving Populations—Analysis of the Critical-Lane Volume Method at Signalized Intersections.  College Park, MD: The University of Maryland at College Park, August 2001.
  82. Harwood, D.W., M.T. Pietrucha, M.D. Wooldridge, R.E. Brydia, and K. Fitzpatrick. NCHRP Report 375: Median Intersection Design. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, 1995.
  83. Radwan, A.E., K.C. Sinha, and H.L. Michael. Development and Use of a Computer Simulation Model for the Evaluation of Design and Control Alternatives for Intersections of Minor Roads with Multilane Rural Highways. Report Nos. FHWA-IN-79/8, FHWA-IN-79/9, and FHWA-IN-79/10. Joint Highway Research Project. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University, July 1979.
  84. Priest, R.V. "Statistical Relationships Between Traffic Volume, Median Width, and Accident Frequency on Divided Highway Grade Intersections." Highway Research News, No. 13.  Washington, DC: Highway Research Board, NRC, June 1964.
  85. Castronovo, S., P.W. Dorothy, and T.L. Maleck. "Investigation of the Effectiveness of Boulevard Roadways." Transportation Research Record 1635 (1998).
  86. Dorothy, P.W., T.L. Maleck, and S.E. Nolf. "Operational Aspects of Michigan Design for Divided Highways." Transportation Research Record 1579 (1997).
  87. FHWA. Vegetation Control for Safety: A Guide for Street and Highway Maintenance Personnel. Report No. FHWA-RT-90-003. Washington, DC: USDOT, 1990.
  88. Gluck, J., H.S. Levinson, and V.G. Stover. NCHRP Report 420: Impacts of Access Management Techniques. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, 1999
  89. ITE. Transportation and Land Development, 2nd Edition. Washington, DC: ITE, 2002.
  90. TRB. Access Management Manual. Washington, DC: TRB, 2003.
  91. Xu, L. "Right Turns Followed by U-Turns vs. Direct Left Turns: A Comparison of Safety Issues." ITE Journal, November 2001, pp. 36-43.
  92. Papayannoulis, V., J.S. Gluck, K. Feeney, and H.S. Levinson. "Access Spacing and Traffic Safety." Transportation Research Circular E-C019: Urban Street Symposium Conference Proceedings, Dallas, TX, June 28-30, 1999. Washington, DC: TRB, NRC, December 2000.
  93. McLean, J. Transport Research Report 315: Practical Relationships for the Assessment of Road Feature Treatments. Summary Report. Australian Road Research Board, 1997.
  94. Colorado Department of Transportation. Colorado Access Control Demonstration Project: Final Report.  Denver, CO: Colorado Department of Transportation, June 1985.
  95. Maze, T., D. Plazak, P. Chao, J. K. Evans, E. Padgett, and J. Witmer. Access Management Research and Awareness Program, Phase IV Final Report. CTRE Management Project 97-1. Center for Transportation Research and Education: November 1999.
  96. McCoy, P.T., and J.E. Heimann. "Effect of Driveway Traffic on Saturation Flow Rates at Signalized Intersections." ITE Journal, February 1990, pp. 12-15.
  97. Vargas, F.A., and Y. Gautam. "Problem: Roadway Safety vs. Commercial Development Access." In 1989 Compendium of Technical Papers, ITE, 59th Annual Meeting, San Diego, CA. Washington, DC: ITE, 1989, pp. 46-50.
  98. ITE. The Traffic Safety Toolbox: A Primer on Traffic Safety. Washington, DC: ITE, 1999.
  99. Rakha, H., A. Medina, H. Sin, F. Dion, M. Van Aerde, and J. Jenq.  "Traffic Signal Coordination Across Jurisdictional Boundaries: Field Evaluation of Efficiency, Energy, Environmental, and Safety Impacts." Transportation Research Record 1727 (2000).
  100. Avgoustis, A. Quantifying the Safety Impacts of Intelligent Transportation Systems. Master of Engineering Thesis, Civil Engineering Department, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 1999
  101. Southeast Michigan Council of Governments. SEMCOG Traffic Safety Manual, Third Edition. 1998
  102. Colorado Department of Transportation. Colorado Access Control Demonstration Project: Final Report.  Denver, CO: Colorado Department of Transportation, June 1985.
  103. Collura, J., J. Chang, E.W. Willhaus, and J. Gifford. "Traffic Signal Preemption and Priority: Technologies, Past Deployments, and System Requirements." In 2001 ITS America Conference Proceedings, Miami Beach, FL, 2001.
  104. Zegeer, C.V., and C. Seiderman. "Designing for Pedestrians." In 2001 Compendium of Technical Papers, ITE, 71st Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL. Washington, DC: ITE, 2001.
  105. UK Dept. of Transportation, London, England. Killing Speed and Saving Lives. See also Limpert, Rudolph. Motor Vehicle Accident Reconstruction and Cause Analysis. Fourth Edition. Charlottesville, VA: The Michie Company, 1994
  106. King, M. "Calming New York City Intersections." Transportation Research Circular E-C019: Urban Street Symposium Conference Proceedings, Dallas, TX, June 28-30, 1999. Washington, DC: TRB, NRC, December 2000.
  107. Walkinfo.org Pedestrian and Bicycle Information Center, "Crossing Enhancements." http://www.walkinginfo.org/engineering/crossings-enhancements.cfm
  108. Retting, R.A., and R. Van Houten. "Safety Benefits of Advance Stop Lines at Signalized Intersections: Results of a Field Evaluation." ITE Journal, September 2000, pp. 47-49, 54.
  109. Zegeer, C.V., and M.J. Cynecki. "Evaluation of Countermeasures Related to RTOR Accidents that Involve Pedestrians." Transportation Research Record 1059 (1986).
  110. Lalani, N. and the ITE Pedestrian and Bicycle Task Force. Alternative Treatments for At-Grade Pedestrian Crossings. Washington, DC: ITE, 2001.
  111. FHWA. Pedestrian Safety Countermeasure Deployment Project web site.  http://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/ped_bike/tools_solve/ped_scdproj/
  112. Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT). Local Agency Safety Management System. Olympia, WA: WSDOT, September 2000.
  113. Lord, D., A. Smiley, and A. Haroun. "Pedestrian Accidents with Left-Turning Traffic at Signalized Intersections: Characteristics, Human Factors and Unconsidered Issues." Presented at TRB 77th Annual Meeting, 1998.
  114. Zaidel, D.M., and I. Hocherman. "Safety of Pedestrian Crossings at Signalized Intersections." Transportation Research Record 1141 (1987).
  115. Barlow, J. "Making Intersections Accessible for the Visually Impaired." In 2001 Compendium of Technical Papers, ITE, 71st Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL. Washington, DC: ITE, 2001.
  116. Van Houten, R., J.E.L. Malenfant, J. Van Houten, and R.A. Retting. "Auditory Pedestrian Signals Increase Pedestrian Observing Behavior at Signalized Intersections." Presented at TRB 77th Annual Meeting, 1998.
  117. Allsbrook, L. "Pedestrian Signal Countdown Device." In 1999 Compendium of Technical Papers, ITE, 69th Annual Meeting, Las Vegas, NV. Washington, DC: ITE, 1999.
  118. Chester, D.C., and M. Hammond. "Evaluation of Pedestrians Understanding of Pedestrians Countdown Signals." In 1998 Compendium of Technical Papers, ITE, 68th Annual Meeting, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Washington, DC: ITE, 1998.
  119. Markowitz, F., S. Sciortino, J.L. Fleck, and B.M. Yee. "Pedestrian Countdown Signals: Experience with an Extensive Pilot Installation." ITE Journal, January 2006, pp. 43-48. Updated by Memorandum: Olea, R., "Collision changes 2002-2004 and countdown signals." (February 7, 2006)
  120. Van Houten, R., J.E. Malenfant, & R. Steiner.  "Scanning 'eyes' symbol as part of the WALK signal: Examination across several intersection geometries and timing parameters."  Transportation Research Record 1773 (2001): 75-81.
  121. Van Houten, R., R.A. Retting, J. Van Houten, C.M. Farmer, and J.E.L. Malenfant. "Use of Animation in LED Pedestrian Signals to Improve Pedestrian Safety." ITE Journal, February 1999, pp. 30-38.
  122. Zegeer, C, K. Opiela, and M. Cynecki. Pedestrian Signalization Alternatives. Report No. FHWA-RD-83-102. Washington, DC: USDOT, 1983.
  123. New Jersey Department of Transportation. Pedestrian Compatible—Planning and Design Guidelines. Trenton, NJ: New Jersey Department of Transportation, 2001.
  124. 124. Elvik, R., T. Vaa, A. Erke, and M. Sorensen. The Handbook of Road Safety Measures. Second Edition. United Kingdom: Emerald Group Publishing, 2009.
  125. King. M., Walking Info Case Study No. 37, Zebra Crosswalk Markings, New York, NY. http://www.walkinginfo.org/pedsafe/casestudy.cfm?CS_NUM=37
  126. Herrstedt, L., M.A. Nielsen, L. Agústson, K.M.L. Krogsgaard, E. Jørgensen, and N.O. Jørgensen. Safety of Cyclists in Urban Areas: Danish Experiences. Copenhagen, Denmark: Danish Road Directorate, 1994.
  127. Turner, S. A., Wood, G., Hughes, T., and Singh, R., "Safety Performance Functions for Bicycle Crashes in New Zealand and Australia." Presented at the 90th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., (2011)
  128. Jensen, S.U., and M.A. Nielsen. "The Marking of Bicycle Crossings at Signalized Intersections" (in Danish). Summarized in Nordic Road & Transport Research 1(1997). p. 27.
  129. Texas Transportation Institute. TCRP Report 19: Guidelines for the Location and Design of Bus Stops. Transit Cooperative Research Program. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, 1996.
  130. Park, Y, and W.C. Kloos. "Applicability of Countermeasures to Implement Farside Travel Lane Bus Stops Case Study: Lloyd District Transit Hub, Portland, Oregon." In 1998 Compendium of Technical Papers, ITE, 68th Annual Meeting, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Washington, DC: ITE, 1998.
  131. Shalah, F., A. Shalaby, B. Persaud, B., and A. Hadayeghi, "Analysis of Transit Safety at Signalized Intersections in Toronto." TRB 88th Annual Meeting Compendium of Papers CD-ROM. Washington, DC: 2009.
  132. New York State Department of Transportation. Accident Reduction Factors. 2002.
  133. FHWA. 9 Proven Safety Countermeasures Guidance Policy. 2008.
  134. Eccles, K.A., and H.W. McGee. A History of the Yellow and All-Red Intervals for Traffic Signals. Washington, DC: ITE, 2001.
  135. McGee, H., K. Moriarty, K. Eccles, et al. NCHRP Report 731: Guidelines for Timing Yellow and All-Red Intervals at Signalized Intersections. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, 2012.
  136. Souleyrette, R. R., M. M. O'Brien, T. McDonald, H. Preston, and R. Storm. "Effectiveness of All- Red Clearance Interval on Intersection Crashes." Iowa State University, Center for Transportation Research and Education. Report Number MN/RC-2004-26, 2004.
  137. Bonneson, J., K. Zimmerman, C. Messer, D. Lord, and M. Wooldridge. Development of Ramp Design Procedures for Facilities without Frontage Roads. Report FHWA/TX-05/0-4538-2. Texas Department of Transportation, Austin, Texas, September 2004.
  138. Retting, R.A. and Chapline, J.F. 2002. "Changes in Crash Risk Following Re-Timing of Traffic Signal Change Intervals." Accident Analysis and Prevention 34/2: 215-220.
  139. Harkey, D., Srinivasan, R., Zegeer, C., Persaud, B., Lyon, C., Eccles, K., Council, F. M., and McGee, H., "Crash Reduction Factors for Traffic Engineering and Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) Improvements: State of Knowledge Report." Research Results Digest 299 (2005).
  140. Ontario Ministry of Transportation. Ontario Traffic Manual Book 12—Traffic Signals. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Ontario Ministry of Transportation, July 2001.
  141. Bonneson, J.A.; Zimmerman, K.H.; and Brewer, M. 2002. Engineering Measures to Reduce Red Light Running. Texas Department of Transportation Report No. FHWA/TX-03/4027-2.
  142. Harkey, D., et al., NCHRP Report 617: Accident Modification Factors for Traffic Engineering and ITS Improvements, Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, 2008.
  143. Murphy, B., "An Evaluation of the Safety Effects of Modifying Late Night Flash Signal Operations in North Carolina." TRB 88th Annual Meeting Compendium of Papers CD-ROM. Washington, D.C., (2009).
  144. Hasson, P., P. Lutkevich, B. Ananthanarayanan, P. Watson, and R. Knoblauch. "Field Test for Lighting to Improve Safety at Pedestrian Crosswalks." Presented at the 2004 TRB Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, 2004.
  145. Elvik, R. and Vaa, T., "Handbook of Road Safety Measures." Elsevier Science Ltd., Oxford, UK: 2004.
  146. Rodegerdts, L., et. al., NCHRP Report 672: Roundabouts: An Informational Guide, Second Edition. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, 2010.
  147. Markowitz, F., Sciortino, S., Fleck, J. L., and Yee, B. M., "Pedestrian Countdown Signals: Experience with an Extensive Pilot Installation." ITE Journal, January 2006, pp. 43-48.
  148. Retting, R.A.; S. Mandavilli, E.R. Russell, and A.T. McCartt. "Roundabouts, traffic flow and public opinion." Traffic Engineering and Control 47 (2006):268-72.
  149. Russell, E.R., Mandavilli, S.; and Rys, M.J. 2004. Operational Performance of Kansas Roundabouts: Phase II. Report No. K-TRAN KSU-02-04, Manhattan, KS: Department of Civil Engineering, Kansas State University, 2004.
  150. Brilon, W.; B. Stuwe, and O. Drews. Sicherheit und Leistungsfahigkeit von Kreisverkehrsplatzen. FE Nr 77359/91. Bochum, Germany: Lehrstuhl fur Verkehrswesen, Ruhr-Universitat Bochum, 1993. Cited by: Elvik R. "Effects on road safety of converting intersections to roundabouts: a review of evidence from non-US studies." Transportation Research Record 1847 (2003):1-10.
  151. Schoon, C. and J. van Minnen. "The safety of roundabouts in the Netherlands." Traffic Engineering and Control 35 (1994):142-48.
  152. Persaud, B., E. Hauer, R. A. Retting, R. Vallurupalli, and K. Mucsi. "Crash Reductions Related  to Traffic Signal Removal in Philadelphia." Accident Analysis and Prevention 29/6 (1997): 803-810.
  153. Campbell, J.L., M.G. Lichty, J.L. Brown, et al. NCHRP 600A: Human Factors Guidelines for Road Systems. Washington DC: Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, 2008.
  154. Bhesania, R.P. "Impact of Mast-Mounted Signal Heads on Accident Reduction." ITE Journal, October 1991, p. 25-29.
  155. Thomas, G., D.Smith. "Effectiveness of Roadway Safety Improvements." Iowa State University, 2001.
  156. Srinivasan, R., F. Council, C. Lyon, F. Gross, N. Lefler, and B. Persaud. "Evaluation of the Safety Effectiveness of Selected Treatments at Urban Signalized Intersections." TRB 87th Annual Meeting Compendium of Papers CD-ROM. Washington, D.C., 2008.
  157. Sayed, T., W. Abdelwahab, and J. Nepomuceno. "Safety Evaluation of Alternative Signal Head Design." Transportation Research Record 1635 (1998).
  158. Felipe, E., Mitic, D., and Zein, S. R., "Safety Benefits of Additional Primary Signal Heads." Vancouver, B.C., Insurance Corporation of British Columbia; G.D. Hamilton Associates (1998)
  159. Sayed, T., P. Leur, and J. Pump. "Safety Impact of Increased Traffic Signal Backboards Conspicuity." 2005 TRB 84th Annual Meeting: Compendium of Papers CD-ROM, Vol. TRB#05-16, Washington, D.C., 2005.
  160. Sayed, T., H. Vahidi, and F. Rodriguez. "Advance Warning Flashers: Do They Improve Safety?" Transportation Research Record 1692 (1999).
  161. Polanis, S. F., Traffic Safety Toolbox: A Primer on Traffic Safety. "Chapter 27. Low-Cost Safety Improvements." Washington, DC: Institution of Transportation Engineers, 1999. pp. 265-272.
  162. Farraher, B.A., B.R. Weinholzer, and M.P. Kowski. "The Effect of Advanced Warning Flashers on Red Light Running: A Study Using Motion Imaging Recording System Technology at Trunk Highway 169 and Pioneer Trail in Bloomington, Minnesota." In 1999 Compendium of Technical Papers, ITE, 69th Annual Meeting, Las Vegas, NV.  Washington, DC: ITE, 1999.
  163. Appiah, J., B. Naik, R. Wojtal, L. Rilett, "Safety Effectiveness of Actuated Advance Warning Systems." Transportation Research Record 2250 (2011).
  164. Teply, S. "Safety Implications of Advanced Flashing Amber at Signalized Intersections." Presented at Traffic Safety Summit in Alberta VII, Annual Western Canada Traffic Association Conference, October 4-7, 1998.
  165. Gross, F., N. Lefler, C. Lyon, and K. Eccles. "Safety Effectiveness of Advance Street Name Signs." TRB 89th Annual Meeting Compendium of Papers CD-ROM. Washington, D.C., 2010.
  166. Laughland, J.C., L.E. Haefner, J.W. Hall, and D.R. Clough. NCHRP Report 162: Methods for Evaluating Highway Safety Improvements. Washington DC: Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, 1975.
  167. Schaerer, P. Engineering Studies for Snow Removal. Special Report 115. Washington, DC: Highway Research Board, 1970.
  168. Oh, S., D.R. Ragland, and C.Y. Chan. "Safety Performance of Experimental Pavement Types in California Using Before-and-After Comparisons." TRB 89th Annual Meeting Compendium of Papers CD-ROM. Washington, D.C., 2010.
  169. Bray, J. "The Role of Crash Surveillance and Program Evaluation: NYSDOT's Skid Accident Reduction Program (SKARP)." Presented at 28th International Forum on Traffic Records and Highway Information Systems, Orlando, FL, 2002.
  170. North Carolina Department of Transportation. "Safety Project Development Guide." http://www.doh.dot.state.nc.us/preconstruct/traffic/safety/project_guide/.
  171. Abdel-Aty, M., Devarasetty, P. C., and Pande, A., "Safety Evaluation of Multilane Arterials in Florida." Accident Analysis and Prevention, 41 (2009): 4, pp. 777-788.
  172. California Department of Transportation. Local Assistance Program Guidelines. "Chapter 9—Hazard Elimination Safety Program." 1997.
  173. Hovey, P. W. and Chowdhury, M., "Development of Crash Reduction Factors." 14801(0), Ohio Department of Transport, 2005.
  174. Dixon, K., M. Liebler, H. Zhu, M. Hunter, and B. Mattox. NCHRP Report 612: Safe and Aesthetic Design of Urban Roadside Treatments. Washington DC: Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, 2008.
  175. David, N.A., and J.R. Norman. Motor Vehicle Accidents in Relation to Geometric and Traffic Features of Highway Intersections: Volume II. Report No. FHWA-RD-76-129. Washington, DC: USDOT, 1975.
  176. FHWA. The 1996 Annual Report on Highway Safety Improvement Programs. Report No. FHWA-SA-96-040. Washington, DC: USDOT, 1996.
  177. Zimmerman, K. and Bonneson, J., "In-Service Evaluation of the Detection-Control System for Isolated High-Speed Intersections." 2006 TRB 85th Annual Meeting: Compendium of Papers CD-ROM, Vol. TRB#06-1252, Washington, D.C., 2006.
  178. Madsen, T. and P. Baxandall, "Caution: Red Light Cameras Ahead." U.S. Public Interest Research Group (PIRG) Education Fund, 2011.
  179. Eccles, K., R. Fiedler, B. Persaud, C. Lyon and G. Hansen. NCHRP 729: Automated Enforcement for Speeding and Red Light Running. Washington DC: Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, 2012
  180. Federal Highway Administration, "Red-Light Camera Enforcement: Implementation Guidance" website. http://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/intersection/redlight/cameras/ipl_guide.cfm
  181. Oregon Department of Transportation. Highway Design Manual. Salem, OR: Oregon Department of Transportation, 2003.
  182. Harwood, D.  NCHRP Report 330: Effective Utilization of Street Width. Washington DC: Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, 1990.
  183. FHWA. Techbrief:  Safety Evaluation of Offset Improvements for Left-Turn Lanes, Report No. FHWA-HRT-09-036, June 2009.
  184. Agent, K., N. Stamatiadis, and S. Jones. Development of Accident Reduction Factors. Kentucky Highway Research Program, Research Report KTC-96-13. Lexington, KY: University of Kentucky, 1996.
  185. Oregon Department of Transportation. Traffic Signal Policy and Guidelines. Salem, OR: Oregon Department of Transportation, November 19, 1999.
  186. ITE, Traffic Engineering Council Committee 5A-5, Design and Safety of Pedestrian Facilities. Washington, DC: ITE, 1998.
  187. FHWA. Development of Guidelines for Triple Left and Dual Right-turn Lanes. Report No. FHWA/TX-11/0-6112-1. Washington, DC: USDOT, 2011.
  188. Ackeret, K.W. "Criteria for the Geometric Design of Triple Left-Turn Lanes."  ITE Journal, December 1994, pp. 27-33.
  189. Ackeret, K.W., S.S. Nambisan, and R. Menon.  "Evaluation of Side Swipe Crashes at Triple and Dual Turn Lanes in Las Vegas, Nevada."  In 1999 Compendium of Technical Papers, ITE, 69th Annual Meeting, Las Vegas, NV. Washington, DC: ITE, 1999.
  190. Belluccia, A.G., G.L. Harter, and M.J. Rechtoric.  "Triple Left-turn Lanes:  Getting the First One Approved."  In 1998 Compendium of Technical Papers, ITE, 68th Annual Meeting, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Washington, DC: ITE, 1998.
  191. Dixon, K.K., J.L. Hibbard, and H. Nyman.  "Right-Turn Treatment for Signalized Intersections."  Transportation Research Circular E-C019: Urban Street Symposium Conference Proceedings, Dallas, TX, June 28-30, 1999.
  192. Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT). Highway Design Manual. Olympia, WA: Environmental and Engineering Services Center, WSDOT, September 2002.
  193. Lin, F.B. "Right-Turn-on-Red Characteristics and Use of Auxiliary Right-Turn Lanes." Transportation Research Record 1010 (1985).
  194. Tsao, S. M., and S. W. Ando. "A Study on Adjustment Factors for U-Turns in Left-Turn Lanes at Signalized Intersections." Journal of Advanced Transportation, 29 (1995): 2, pp. 183-192.
  195. Nevers, B., et. al., NCHRP Report 707: Guidelines on the Use of Auxiliary Through Lanes at Signalized Intersections. Washington DC: Transportation Research Board of the National Academies,  2011.
  196. A. James Clark School of Engineering, University of Maryland, "Auxiliary Lane Length" web page.  http://attap.umd.edu/bbs/view.php?id=Tools&page=1&sn1=&divpage=1&sn=off&ss=on&sc=on&select_arrange=headnum&desc=asc&no=1
  197. USDOT, "Policy Statement on Bicycle and Pedestrian Accommodation Regulations and Recommendations." Washington, DC: 2010.  https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/bicycle_pedestrian/overview/policy_accom.cfm
  198. FHWA, "Guidance Memorandum on Consideration and Implementation of Proven Safety Countermeasures." Waashington, D.C.: 2008.
  199. FHWA, Safe Access is Good for Business. Report No. FHWA-HOP-06-107. Washington, DC: USDOT, 2006.
  200. Fitzpatrick, K., W. Schneider, and E. Park, "Operation and Safety of Right-turn Lane Designs." Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting. Washington, DC.  2006.
  201. National Transportation Operations Coalition. National Traffic Signal Report Card, 2012.  Washington, D.C.: ITE, 2012.
  202. ITS Benefits and Costs Database, USDOT ITS Joint Program Office, http://www.benefitcost.its.dot.gov/
  203. Surface Transportation Policy Partnership.  "Transportation and the Environment" web page. http://www.transact.org/library/factsheets/environment.asp
  204. Environmental Protection Agency. "Technology Transfer Network 1996 National-Scale Air Toxics Assessment" web page. http://www.epa.gov/ttnatw01/nata/natsa1.cfml
  205. ITE.  Preemption of Traffic Signals Near Railroad Grade Crossings: An ITE Recommended Practice.  Washington, DC: ITE, 2006.
  206. ITS America, Transit Signal Priority (TSP): A Planning and Implementation Handbook. Washington, DC: ITS America, 2005.
  207. FHWA, Safety Evaluation of Red Light Cameras. Report No. FHWA-RT-05-048. Washington, DC: USDOT, 2005.

Previous | Table of Contents

Page last modified on February 1, 2017
Safe Roads for a Safer Future - Investment in roadway safety saves lives
Federal Highway Administration | 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE | Washington, DC 20590 | 202-366-4000