U.S. Department of Transportation
Federal Highway Administration
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Washington, DC 20590
202-366-4000
FHWA's RSPCB Peer-to-Peer Program (P2P) supports and sponsors peer exchanges and workshops hosted by agencies.
Date
September 17-18, 2013
Hosts
California Local Technical Assistance Program
California Department of Transportation
Participants
Alaska
Arizona
California
Idaho
Nevada
Utah
Washington
FHWA Office of Safety
FHWA Resource Center
U.S. DOT Volpe Center
FHWA Technology Partnership Program
FHWA's Office of Safety sponsors P2P events.
Learn more
1. Introduction and Background
3. Strategy Highway Safety Plans Noteworthy Practices
4. Transportation Safety Performance Measures
This report provides a summary of the proceedings of the Region 9 Local Road Safety Peer Exchange held in Sacramento, California on September 17 and 18, 2013. The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Office of Safety (HSA) sponsored the peer exchange in coordination with Region 9 of the National Local Technical Assistance Program Association (NLTAPA). The goal of the peer exchange was to facilitate the exchange of information on local road safety and explore opportunities for greater coordination and communication between FHWA, State Departments of Transportation (DOTs), Local/Tribal Technical Assistance Program (LTAP/TTAP) Centers, and local officials/practitioners within the States. The Peer Exchange covered the following key topics:
Region 9 States in attendance included: Alaska, Arizona, California, Idaho, Nevada, Utah, and Washington. Representatives from the following local agencies participated in this event: the City of Sacramento, CA; Nevada County, CA; Placer County, CA; Trinity County, CA; the Cache Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO), Logan, UT; Gila River Community, Sacaton, AZ; and Thurston County, WA (see Appendix A for a complete list of participants).
The format of the Peer Exchange consisted of a series of presentations and roundtable and breakout group discussions (see Appendix B for the full agenda). Participants from each State were charged with developing action plans at the end of the workshop to address the key topics noted above in their respective States. The action plans identify strategies to address each issue, as well as resources and champions to advance those objectives.
A brief description of the peer exchange proceedings is provided below.
The FHWA California Division Director for National Programs and the Caltrans Office Chief for Local Assistance Bridge and Safety Programs welcomed participants to the peer exchange. The presenters discussed the challenges and opportunities that the implementation of MAP-21 presents to local road safety. The presenters also provided an overview of local road safety issues in California and stressed the value of collaboration and the free exchange of ideas.
The FHWA Office of Safety Local and Rural Road Safety (LRRS) Program Manager provided an overview of the workshop event and asked participants to introduce themselves and share their expectations. Expectations included the following:
The FHWA Office of Safety HSIP Program Manager gave an overview of HSIP to inform the conversation of the event. She also reviewed changes to the program under MAP-21.
HSIP is a core Federal-aid program with the purpose of reducing fatalities and serious injuries on all public roads. HSIP is Federally-funded and State-administered. The program underwent many changes as a result of MAP-21. MAP-21 increased HSIP funding, ended the High Risk Rural Roads Program set-aside, eliminated the requirement for States to submit a transparency report, and increased eligibility for non-infrastructure safety projects. MAP-21 also introduced a regular SHSP update cycle.
Federal requirements and support for SHSPs fall under HSIP, as does the Railway-Highway Crossing Program. SHSPs are data-driven, Statewide, comprehensive transportation safety plans that identify safety emphasis areas and strategies to facilitate coordination among State safety stakeholders. The SHSP is intended to guide HSIP investment decisions. This approach results in a systematic and repeatable process, defensible decisions, and, ultimately, the prevention of traffic fatalities and serious injury crashes. Increasing and sustaining local involvement in HSIP and SHSP processes is a major challenge and a key focus of the peer exchange.
The Program Manager for LTAP/TTAP at the FHWA Technology Partnership Program presented an overview of the activities and accomplishments of LTAP/TTAP Centers across the country. There is an LTAP Center in every State and Puerto Rico and there are seven TTAP Centers. Most LTAPs are housed within universities or State DOTs. The flexibility of LTAP/TTAP allows Centers to partner with State DOTs to address the needs of local agencies through training, technical assistance, technology transfer, and communications and marketing.
NLTAPA represents the 58 LTAP and TTAP Centers in the United States. The Federal Highway Administration and NLTAPA have instituted the Joint Safety Program to support the integration of roadway safety into LTAP/TTAP. An overview of the LTAP/TTAP roadway safety accomplishments report for 2012 identified ongoing successes and areas of opportunity for LTAP/TTAP Centers to improve roadway safety through the training, technical assistance, communications, and other services that they provide. Common training and education activities at LTAP/TTAP Centers include: offering relevant National Highway Institute (NHI) and Resource Center trainings, identifying gaps in road safety training available, and delivering original courses to address specific needs. Although every LTAP/TTAP Center operates differently a number of Centers provide local agencies access to safety data, assist local agencies in solving local safety problems, and coordinate among local agencies and connect them to State DOTs.
A representative from the FHWA Resource Center explained the benefits of Local Road Safety Plans (LRSPs) as part of the local road safety planning process and discussed the steps in the development of an LRSP.
LRSPs are locally-coordinated safety plans that provide a comprehensive, flexible framework that draws upon the 4Es of safety: engineering, enforcement, education, and emergency medical services. LRSPs may result in increased funding for safety improvements in locations where such funding has not traditionally been available, as they help local agencies identify potential safety projects and funding sources for those projects. LRSPs also raise the safety awareness of local officials and may help to establish productive partnerships among local, regional and State officials. The success of an LRSP often depends upon the presence of a local champion, the clarity of the plan's mission, collaboration between partners, and open lines of communication.
Steps in the development of an LRSP include the following:
The FHWA Office of Safety document " Developing Safety Plans: A Manual for Local Rural Road Owners" provides more detailed information on the development of LRSPs.
Representatives from each State offered a brief overview of local safety efforts in their State, emphasizing challenges and best practices associated with safety data, management of the HSIP, and local involvement in the SHSP. The presentations were followed by a roundtable discussion of noteworthy practices mentioned in the presentations. Examples of noteworthy practices highlighted by participants included the following:
Participants heard from three select peers regarding strategies for including local agencies in the development of SHSPs. These presentations were followed by a break-out group discussion highlighting the challenges of encouraging local involvement and identifying possible strategies to engage locals in the development of SHSPs.
As a Target Zero State, Washington has set a goal of zero fatalities and serious injury crashes Statewide by 2030. Washington State is currently on their fourth version of the SHSP. Their update process includes local involvement in the following ways:
ITD is currently on the third update of its SHSP. The agency selects emphasis areas based on the economic cost of crashes, the breakdown for which is included in their SHSP. ITD's SHSP update process includes local involvement in the following ways:
The Gila River Indian Community is located south of the Phoenix Metropolitan Area. The Gila River Indian Community Department of Transportation (GRICDOT) includes multiple departments, including Planning, Construction and Engineering, and Road Maintenance. Gila River is currently developing the first Tribal Safety Plan in Arizona. GRICDOT's SHSP process involves the following actions:
Table 1 summarizes the result of facilitated discussions on the challenges of getting local involvement in the SHSP, whether the SHSP is tailored for local involvement, and possible strategies to get local agencies involved in the SHSP and maintain their interest.
Table 1. Local Involvement in the SHSP: Challenges and Strategies
Challenges | Strategies |
---|---|
|
|
The FHWA Office of Safety HSIP Program Manager gave an overview of transportation safety performance measures under MAP-21. MAP-21 requirements establish safety as one of seven performance goals. MAP-21 will require States and MPOs to:
One key issue related to safety performance management is defining performance in terms of serious injuries by rate and number. As a performance measure, the term " serious injuries" presents a challenge due to the lack of a consistent definition, the lack of consistent coding conventions, and inconsistent data collection based on the determinations of law enforcement officials.
The notice of proposed rulemaking for Transportation Safety Performance Measures under MAP-21 is expected in Spring 2014. An effective date of all performance management rulemaking has tentatively been set for Spring 2015.
Although the final performance management rule is not yet in place, quantifiable data is already helping States measure safety impacts and set usable performance measures; 47 States currently incorporate quantitative safety goals in their SHSP.
Participants heard from three select peers regarding strategies to improve highway safety through HSIP.
California's local rollout of HSIP under the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU) funded a number of projects that were not fully ready for implementation. In recent years, Caltrans DLA has shifted to a more data-driven program that uses existing Statewide crash data. California's HSIP process now recognizes a variety of safety needs and effectively compares widely-varying projects: urban and rural projects, systemic and spot location projects, and motorized and non-motorized projects. Caltrans DLA was able to make this transition through the following measures:
As a sparsely-populated State without a contiguous Statewide roadway network, Alaska does not have traditional local roads initiatives. The State's extreme geography and abundant wildlife present several challenges to local road safety. In the State's remote communities, many trips are made by all-terrain vehicles (ATVs) and snowmobiles, which present crash reporting issues. In administering Alaska's HSIP program, ADOT&PF has adopted the following strategies:
Under the HSIP program, Alaska's LTAP and TTAP Centers plan to facilitate the creation of safety plans for tribal governments, develop web-based training tools, and host " rural modes" safety summits.
Thurston County's HSIP-funded projects have increased greatly in recent years. In 2005, Thurston County was awarded $500,000 in HSIP funding, with a focus on updating existing infrastructure. In 2009, $550,000 was awarded. In 2010 and 2013, $2.4 million was allocated to Thurston County. Many of the improvements were made based on a pilot study that reviewed projects through a prioritized process using the new Systemic Safety Project Selection Tool. These improvement projects included guardrail and delineation, rumble strips, curve sign warning, and extension lines at curves. As a result of this shift toward data-driven improvement projects, Thurston County has experienced a 31 percent total crash rate reduction and a 30 percent reduction in fatal crash rates since 2005.
Safety tools currently used by Thurston County Public Works in the HSIP application process include:
Table 2 summarizes the result of facilitated discussions on challenges to allocating HSIP funds to local agencies, strategies that address these challenges, and noteworthy practices for managing local projects.
Table 2. HSIP Project Selection and Implementation: Challenges and Noteworthy Practices
Challenges | Strategies |
---|---|
|
|
After each group reported back from their respective break-out sessions, the facilitator led a roundtable discussion on opportunities for engaging the LTAP/TTAP Centers and local/tribal practitioners. Participants were encouraged to note ideas about how to involve LTAP/TTAP and local and tribal personnel in the State safety process. They identified the following practices for Centers and State DOTs to accomplish together:
Recommended activities where LTAP/TTAP Centers should take the lead were identified, as follows:
At the end of the event, the State DOT, FHWA Division Office, and LTAP/TTAP representatives of each State met together to discuss actions and strategies for improving their local road safety programs. The resulting action plan also set goals and objectives and identified the resources and champions needed to move actions forward. Representatives from each State reported out to the group the results of their action planning sessions.
Key actions included:
In the evaluations, participants stated that they appreciated learning that they are not alone in facing local road safety challenges. They noted that it was valuable to learn about the flexibility in how HSIP is used in different States, as well as the variation in how safety programs are administered. The most valuable aspects of the event included the opportunity to learn from peer presentations, network with peers, discuss issues in breakout sessions, and develop Action Plans to coordinate actions for improving local road safety. Suggestions for improvements to the event included adding more discussion on project implementation and tribal involvement in SHSP and HSIP. Participants consistently noted their interest in following up with the Action Plans. One attendee wrote, " Will there be follow-up on Action Plans? If we want this Peer Exchange to be beneficial, there should be!”
FHWA/Volpe | |
---|---|
Craig Allred Transportation Specialist FHWA Resource Center Business Phone: 720-963-3236 Business Email: craig.allred@dot.gov |
Karen Scurry Transportation Specialist FHWA Office of Safety Business Phone: 609-637-4207 Business Email: karen.scurry@dot.gov |
Rosemarie Anderson Transportation Specialist FHWA Office of Safety Business Phone: 202-366-5007 Business Email: rosemarie.anderson@dot.gov |
Greg Schertz Safety Discipline Champion FHWA Office of Federal Lands Highway Business Phone: 720-963-3764 Business Email: greg.schertz@dot.gov |
Andrew Berthaume Community Planner U.S. DOT Volpe Center Business Phone: 617-494-3159 Business Email: andrew.berthaume@dot.gov |
Susan Smichenko Community Planner U.S. DOT Volpe Center Business Phone: 617-494-3438 Business Email: susan.smichenko@dot.gov |
Cameron Ishaq Management Consultant Fasterhorse LLC Business Phone: 301-661-9110 Business Email: cameron.ishaq@fasterhorse.com |
Jeffrey Zaharewicz LTAP/TTAP Program Manager FHWA Office of Technical Services Business Phone: 703-235-0991 Business Email: jeffrey.zaharewicz@dot.gov |
Adam Larsen Federal Lands Highway TPP Tribal Coordinator Business Phone: 360-619-7751 Business Email: adam.larsen@dot.gov |
|
Alaska | |
Al Fletcher Field Operations Engineer/Safety Team Leader FHWA Alaska Division Office Business Phone: 907-586-7245 Business Email: al.fletcher@dot.gov |
Matt Walker Asst. State Traffic & Safety Engineer Alaska DOT & Public Facilities Business Phone: 907-465-6963 Business Email: matthew.walker@alaska.gov |
Arizona | |
Mona Aglan-Swick HSIP State Manager Arizona Department of Transportation Business Phone: 602-712-7374 Business Email: maglan-swick@azdot.gov |
Rebecca Mayher AZ LTAP/ITD Tech Program Manager AZ LTAP/Arizona Department of Transportation Business Phone: 602-687-2940 Business Email: mayher@azdot.gov |
Kelly LaRosa Transportation Safety Specialist FHWA Arizona Division Office Business Phone: 602-382-8991 Business Email: kelly.larosa@dot.gov |
Patrick Stone Local Public Agency Program Manager Arizona Department of Transportation Business Phone: 602-712-4428 Business Email: pstone@azdot.gov |
California | |
Hector Barron City Traffic Engineer City of Sacramento, Department of Public Works Business Phone: 916-808-2669 Business Email: hbarron@cityofsacramento.org |
Stephanie Holloway Associate Civil Engineer/Traffic Safety Placer County Department of Public Works - Transportation Business Phone: 530-745-7551 Business Email: shollow@placer.ca.gov |
Jesse Bhullar Chief, Bridge and Safety Programs Caltrans Business Phone: 916-653-4231 Business Email: jesse_bhullar@dot.ca.gov |
Richard Ke Safety Program Coordinator Caltrans Business Phone: 916-653-4727 Business Email: richard.ke@dot.ca.gov |
Steven Castleberry Public Works Director Nevada County Public Works Business Phone: 530-265-1718 Business Email: steven.castleberry@co.nevada.ca.us |
Lori Kempley HQ - Asst. Training Coordinator - Local Assistance Caltrans - Local Assistance Business Phone: 916-651-6548 Business Email: lori_kempley@dot.ca.gov |
Ted Davini Local Safety Program Manager Caltrans Business Phone: 916-651-8256 Business Email: ted.davini@dot.ca.gov |
Ken Kochevar Safety Program Manager FHWA - California Division Office Business Phone: 916-498-5853 Business Email: ken.kochevar@dot.gov |
Chris Engelmann Transportation Engineer Caltrans Business Phone: 805-542-4690 Business Email: chris.engelmann@dot.ca.gov |
Kevan Shafizadeh Technical Director California LTAP Business Phone: 916-278-5348 Business Email: shafizadeh@csus.edu |
Michelle Gianini Project Director California LTAP - California State University, Sacramento Business Phone: 916-278-6174 Business Email: gianinim@csus.edu |
Rick Tippett Director of Transportation Trinity County Business Phone: 530-623-1365 Business Email: rtippett@trinitycounty.org |
Gabe Hernandez Program Manager Sacramento State/CA LTAP Business Phone: 916-278-4805 Business Email: ghernandez@csus.edu |
Arianna Valle Safety Engineer FHWA - California Division Office Business Phone: 916-498-5992 Business Email: arianna.valle@dot.gov |
Idaho | |
Kelly Campbell Research Analyst, Principal Idaho Transportation Dept./Office of Highway Safety Business Phone: 208-334-8105 Business Email: kelly.campbell@itd.idaho.gov |
Laila Kral T2 Manager Idaho Technology Transfer Center/LHTAC Business Phone: 208-344-0565 Business Email: lkral@lhtac.org |
Bruce Drewes Idaho Technology Transfer Center/LHTAC Business Phone: 208-344-0565 Business Email: bdrewes@lhtac.org |
|
Nevada | |
Juan Balbuena Safety/Local Public Agency Program Engineer FHWA Nevada Division Office Business Phone: 775-687-8582 Business Email: juan.balbuena@dot.gov |
Ken Mammen Acting Chief Safety Engineer Nevada Department of Transportation Business Phone: 778-888-7459 Business Email: kmammen@dot.state.nv.us |
Jim Nichols, P.E. Program Director Truckee Meadows Community College Business Phone: 775-829-9022 Business Email: jnichols@tmcc.edu |
Leah Sirmin Planning & Research Program Manager FHWA Nevada Division Office Business Phone: 775-687-8580 Business Email: leah.sirmin@dot.gov |
Utah | |
Nicholas Jones Director Utah LTAP Business Phone: 435-770-6873 Business Email: nick.jones@usu.edu |
Jeff Gilbert Transportation Planner Cache MPO - Logan, UT Business Phone: 435-755-7634 Business Email: jeff.gilbert@cachecounty.org |
Washington | |
Don Petersen Safety & Geometric Design Engineer FHWA Washington Division Office Business Phone: 360-534-9323 Business Email: don.petersen@dot.gov |
Matthew Enders Technical Services Manager WSDOT Business Phone: 360-705-6907 Business Email: matthew.enders@wsdot.wa.gov |
Scott Davis, P.E. Traffic Engineering & Operations Manager Thurston County Public Works Business Phone: 360-867-2345 Business Email: davissa@co.thurston.wa.us |
|
Tribal Representatives | |
Byron Bluehorse Program Manager Alaska TTAP Fairbanks, Alaska Business Phone: 907-474-1580 Business Email: bdbluehorse@alaska.edu |
Sasha Saliego Transportation Planner Gila River Indian Community Sacaton, AZ Business Phone: 520-562-6306 Business Email: sasha.pachito@gmail.com |
September 17, 2013 | |
---|---|
8:00 - 8:30 A.M. | Welcoming Remarks Maiser Khaled, Director for National Programs, FHWA CA Division Jesse Bhullar, CalTrans Workshop Overview |
8:30 - 9:00 A.M. | Participant Introductions |
9:00 - 10:00 A.M. | Presentations Highway Safety Improvement Program Overview Karen Scurry, FHWA Office of Safety FHWA LTAP/TTAP Safety Data Program Performance County Road Safety Plans |
10:00 - 10:15 A.M. | Break |
10:15 - 12:00 P.M. | State Presentations Brief presentation by each State on local safety efforts in data, SHSP, and HSIP Alaska, Arizona, California, Idaho, Nevada, Utah, Washington |
12:00 - 1:00 P.M. | Lunch |
1:00 - 1:45 P.M. | Facilitated Roundtable Discussion Noteworthy practices from the State presentations |
1:45 - 2:45 P.M. | Presentations Strategic Highway Safety Plans - LTAP/TTAP and Local/Tribal Agency involvement in the State SHSP process - Development, Implementation & Marketing
|
2:45 - 3:00 P.M. | Break |
3:00 - 4:00 P.M. | Breakout Groups SHSP and Local Involvement Challenges
|
4:00 - 4:30 P.M. | Report Out |
4:30 - 5:00 P.M. | Wrap Up |
September 18, 2013 | |
8:00 - 8:30 A.M. | Recap of Day 1 |
8:30 - 9:15 A.M. | Facilitated Roundtable Discussion Safety Performance Measures
|
9:15 - 10:15 A.M. | Presentations - Highway Safety Improvement Program Administration, Project Selection, Collaboration, Allocation of Funds to Locals/Tribes
|
10:15 - 10:30 A.M. | Break |
10:30 - 11:30 A.M. | Breakout Groups Highway Safety Improvement Program Project Selection and Implementation
|
11:30 - 12:00 P.M. | Report Back |
12:00 - 1:00 P.M. | Lunch |
1:00 - 1:45 P.M. | Facilitated Roundtable Discussion
|
1:45 - 3:00 P.M. | Action Planning - Breakout Groups by State Each State will develop an Action Plan based on Lessons Learned |
3:00 - 3:45 P.M. | Report Back |
3:45 - 4:00 P.M. | Wrap Up (Next Steps), Adjourn |