U.S. Department of Transportation
Federal Highway Administration
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Washington, DC 20590
202-366-4000
U.S. Department of Transportation
Federal Highway Administration
1200 New Jersey Ave. S.E.
Washington, D.C. 20590
May 9, 2006
In Reply Refer To:
HSA-10/SS-134
Mr. Larry Leahy, President
Xcessories Squared
P.O. Box 135
Auburn, Illinois 62615
Dear Mr. Leahy :
Thank you for your January 31, 2006, letter requesting the Federal Highway Administration’s (FHWA) acceptance of your company’s “Redi-Torque” Model 280 Hardware Kit for use on your previously accepted breakaway slip base sign supports on the National Highway System (NHS). Accompanying your letter was a report from E-Tech Testing Services detailing pendulum tests of a dual post installation. You requested that we find the Redi-Torque system acceptable for use on the NHS under the provisions of the National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Report 350 “Recommended Procedures for the Safety Performance Evaluation of Highway Features.” You included three related requests:
1) Acceptance of three posts within a seven-foot span.
2) Acceptance for the Redi-Torque system with other slip base systems.
3) Modified top portion of the slip base, which is a 3x3-inch, 7 gage structural tube in place of the two angles to receive the 2-1/2” square steel tube sign support.
Introduction
Testing of the supports was in compliance with the guidelines contained in the NCHRP Report 350, Recommended Procedures for the Safety Performance Evaluation of Highway Features. Requirements for breakaway supports are those in the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials' Standard Specifications for Structural Supports for Highway Signs, Luminaires and Traffic Signals.
The Xcessories Squared Slip Base for perforated square steel tube sign supports was initially accepted by the FHWA acceptance letter SS-68 on September 18, 1996. This letter has been the subject of nine previous modifications, SS-68A to SS-68I.
The Redi-Torque kit consists of 3 each 1/2” Grade 8, double head bolts that have a neck down area between the two hex heads of the bolt. The top hex is a 9/16” and the bottom is a 3/4” flange hex. This insures that the 9/16” socket or wrench used will not fit on the 3/4” hex. The neck down portion between the hexes is formed in the manufacturing process to allow a consistent break off of the top hex at the same foot-pounds of torque each time.
To further aid in friction reduction between the plates, 3 horseshoe shaped 3/16” Teflon coated steel washers were employed, one at each notch, between the plates. Teflon coated shim washers of the same shape with a 0.030 inch thickness are available for plumbing. A standard 1/2” inch washer is placed under the flange bolt head to allow for a proper torque to be achieved without premature separation of the top hex. The intent of this system is to allow installation without the use of special tools while ensuring that proper torque is achieved.
Testing
Pendulum testing was conducted on your company’s devices. The mass of the pendulum test bogie was 845 kg in all tests. The complete devices as tested are shown in the Enclosures. The bases were installed with a stub height no greater than 4 inches.
| Test # | NCHRP 350 | Speed | Version | Occup. Speed | Delta V |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3-60 | 35.0 kmh | Redi Torque, dual post | No Contact | 0.55 m/s |
Occup. Speed: Occupant Impact Speed: Speed at which a theoretical front seat occupant will contact the windshield. In meters per second.
Delta V: Speed change of the test vehicle, maximum allowable is 5.0 m/s.
Findings
Velocity changes were all within acceptable limits, and the stub was four inches or less, as designed. The results of testing met the FHWA requirements and, therefore, the device described above and shown in the enclosed drawings for reference are acceptable for use as Test Level 3 devices on the NHS under the range of conditions tested, when proposed by a State.
Our analysis of the three additional requests:
1) Acceptance of three posts within a seven-foot span. Three post extrapolation data from E-Tech was provided on February 1, 2006. It shows an estimated Delta V of 0.83 m/s. We concur in this request.
2) Acceptance for the Redi-Torque system with other slip base systems. The Redi-Torque bolts impart a much greater load than normally called for in conventional slip base designs. During a discussion with Mr. Nicholas Artimovich of my staff you indicated that the Redi-Torque bolts are designed to work as intended when used with the Teflon coated washers to reduce friction. In light of that, we will accept the use of Redi-Torque bolts in conventional slip base systems when the following conditions are met:
The Redi Torque bolts are only to be used with the complete hardware kit, comprised of bolt, slip washers, flat washers, and nut.
When the Redi torque kit is being used with square or rectangular slip plates with 4 bolts only 2 units may be used in a 7 foot span, and 3units in 7 feet when using a 3 bolt pattern on triangular bases.
3) Modify the top portion of the slip base by using a 3x3-inch, 7 gage structural tube in place of the two angles to receive the 2-1/2” square steel tube sign support. The proposed system is more robust than the original tested system, and is considered acceptable.
Please note the following standard provisions that apply to the FHWA letters of acceptance:
Sincerely yours, /original signed by/ John R. Baxter, P.E. |
Enclosures
