June 21, 1999
Refer to: HMHS / SS-82
Mr. Kevin Farrell
President
Saint Louis Steel Products
133 McDonnell Rlvd.
St. Louis, MO 63042
Dear Mr. Farrell:
This is in further response to your February 8 letter to Mr. Nicholas Artimovich of my office requesting acceptance of your company's tubular steel posts as breakaway sign supports on the National Highway System (NHS). In support of your request you included information on the geometric, chemical, and physical properties of the posts which indicate that they will be in reasonably close conformity with perforated square steel tube sign supports that we have previously found acceptable by virtue of full-scale crash testing, and/or by comparison with posts found acceptable by engineering analysis.
You indicated that the sheet steel used to fabricate your company's posts will conform to the specification ASTM A653. Your product literature indicates that the rolled 14 gage tubes will conform to ASTM A570, Grade 50, steel, and the 12 gage tubes will conform to ASTM A570, Grade 40. Perforated square steel tube sign supports meeting these specifications for the steel and the rolled product have been previously found acceptable for use. The 7/16-inch (11.1-mm) perforations punched 1-inch (2.54-mm) on-center on all four sides are identical to those on perforated square steel tube breakaway sign supports previously found acceptable.
You also provided the results of mill certifications for the chemical and physical properties of the steel. The results compared favorably with the steel specification ASTM A653-94. (A653 replaced the steel tube specification that was used in the past, namely A446.) The following table summarizes the sizes and materials you intend to use:
Wall Thickness |
14 Gage (2.11 mm) |
12 Gage (2.66 mm) |
Steel (ASTM) |
A570, Grade 50 |
A570, Grade 40 |
Sizes (SI units) mm |
44.45, 50.80, 57.15 |
44.45, 50.80, 57.15, 63.50 |
Sizes (conventional US units) inches |
1.75, 2.00, 2.25 |
1.75, 2.00, 2.25, 2.50 |
After reviewing our records of experience with similar posts we find that there are a number of combinations of post size, material, and foundation conditions which are acceptable for use on the NHS, if proposed by a State. These combinations are shown in the enclosed table.
Our acceptance is limited to the breakaway characteristics of the supports and does not cover the structural features. Presumably, you will provide users with sufficient information on structural design and installation requirements to ensure proper performance of your supports. We anticipate that the transportation agencies will require certification from St. Louis Steel that the hardware furnished will have essentially the same chemistry, mechanical properties, and geometry as those covered by this acceptance and that they will meet Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) change in velocity requirements. To prevent misunderstanding by others, this letter of acceptance, designated as number SS-82, shall not be reproduced except in full.
Sincerely yours,
[Original
signed by Dwight A. Horne]
Dwight A. Horne
Director, Office of Highway Safety Infrastructure
Enclosure
Acceptable Uses of Perforated Square Steel Tube Sign Posts, Per request of Saint Louis Steel Products
14 Gage posts are fabricated from ASTM A653 SQ Grade 50, Modified to “Grade 55”, certified to 414 MPa min yield 1
12 Gage posts are fabricated from ASTM A653 SQ Grade 40 1
Post Size mm x mm (in x in) |
One Post in a 2.1-m Path |
Two Posts in a 2.1-m Path |
||||||||||||||
Standard Soil |
Weak Soil |
Standard Soil |
Weak Soil |
|||||||||||||
With Anchor Base (2) |
Direct Burial |
With Anchor Base (2) |
Direct Burial |
With Anchor Base (2) |
Direct Burial |
With Anchor Base (2) |
Direct Burial |
|||||||||
2.10 mm (3) |
2.66 mm (3) |
2.10 mm (3) |
2.66 mm (3) |
2.10 mm (3) |
2.66 mm (3) |
2.10 mm (3) |
2.66 mm (3) |
2.10 mm (3) |
2.66 mm (3) |
2.10 mm (3) |
2.66 mm (3) |
2.10 mm (3) |
2.66 mm (3) |
2.10 mm (3) |
2.66 mm (3) |
|
63.5x63.5 (2.5x2.5) |
- |
yes |
- |
- |
- |
yes |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
57.2x57.2 (2.25x2.25)* |
yes |
yes |
yes |
yes |
yes |
yes |
yes |
yes |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
50.8x50.8 (2.0x2.0) |
yes |
yes |
yes |
yes |
yes |
yes |
yes |
yes |
yes |
yes |
yes |
- |
yes |
yes |
yes |
- |
44.5x44.5 (1.75x1.75)* |
yes |
yes |
yes |
yes |
yes |
yes |
yes |
yes |
yes |
yes |
yes |
yes |
yes |
yes |
yes |
yes |
38.1x38.1 (1.5x1.5) |
yes |
yes |
yes |
yes |
yes |
yes |
yes |
yes |
yes |
yes |
yes |
yes |
yes |
yes |
yes |
yes |
* These three sizes are the only ones expected to be produced with a 14 ga wall thickness. The 38.1 x 38.1 mm post size is acceptable because it is smaller, and likely to be crashworthy.