U.S. Department of Transportation
Federal Highway Administration
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Washington, DC 20590

Skip to content
Facebook iconYouTube iconTwitter iconFlickr iconLinkedInInstagram


FHWA Home / Safety / Transportation Safety Planning (TSP) / Safety Performance Measures

A Primer on Safety Performance Measures for the Transportation Planning Process

< Previous Table of Contents Next >

What Are Safety Performance Measures?

Performance measures are indicators that enable decision-makers and other stakeholders to monitor changes in system condition and performance against established visions, goals, and objectives. Typical safety performance measures relate to the number and rate of fatalities and/or crashes and incidents, emergency response times, public perceptions of safety, etc., for the relevant transportation modes.1

Safety performance measures provide the following benefits to the planning and decision-making process (Source 4):

Safety performance measures should be relevant to the safety issues and policy/strategy initiatives in a jurisdiction. The number and rate of fatalities, injuries, and/or crashes are commonly used safety performance measures. However, given that safety issues vary across the country, no single set of safety performance measures is applicable to every State and region.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) and the Governors Highway Safety Association (GHSA) have developed a set of safety performance measures that each State will be required to track beginning in Federal fiscal year 2010 (see Table 1). Some of the performance measures listed in the table below (i.e., counts and rates of fatalities, number of serious injuries, number of speeding-related fatalities, and number of pedestrian fatalities) are common to both the infrastructure and behavioral transportation safety area. As State DOTs, MPOs, and other transportation safety stakeholders move forward with developing safety performance measures for the transportation planning process they can take advantage of these data and adopt some of these safety performance measures if appropriate.

Table 1. Safety Performance Measures (Source 5)
Core Measures Description Data Sources
C-1 Number of traffic fatalities (three-year or five-year moving averages) FARS
C-2 Number of serious injuries in traffic crashes State crash data files
C-3 Fatalities/VMT (including rural, urban, and total fatalities) FARS, FHWA
C-4 Number of unrestrained passenger vehicle occupant, all seat positions FARS
C-5 Number of fatalities in crashes involving a driver or motorcycle operator with a blood alcohol concentration of .08 g/dL or higher FARS
C-6 Number of speeding-related fatalities FARS
C-7 Number of motorcyclist fatalities FARS
C-8 Number of unhelmeted motorcyclist fatalities FARS
C-9 Number of drivers 20 or younger involved in fatal crashes FARS
C-10 Number of pedestrian fatalities FARS
B-1 Observed seat belt use for passenger vehicles, front seat outboard occupants Survey
A-1 Number of seat belt citations issued during grant-funded enforcement activities Grant activity reporting
A-2 Number of impaired-driving arrests made during grant-funded enforcement activities Grant activity reporting
A-3 Number of speed citations issued during grant-funded activities Grant activity reporting

C = Core measure; B = Behavioral measure; A = Activity measure

The safety performance measures in Table 1 are organized in three categories representing the types of measures often found in practice:

Core measures (also known as outcome measures) relate to the safety goals and objectives established as part of policy or as part of a planning process. These measures allocate resources and measure overall progress. They may include crashes, injuries, and fatalities and can be presented as numbers, rates, percentages, or ratios.

Behavioral measures provide a link between specific safety activities and outcomes by assessing whether the activities influenced behavior. These may include direct observations of safety belt use and vehicle speed or self-reported behavior pertaining to program awareness and attitude obtained through surveys.

Activity measures document safety program implementation and track actions taken by law enforcement, courts, media, education, and others to reduce crashes, injuries, and fatalities.

In addition to the safety performance measures developed by NHTSA and GHSA, some examples of infrastructure-related safety performance measures that can be considered for inclusion in the transportation planning process may include:

1 Performance measures are different from evaluation criteria, which relate to assessing the relative safety benefi ts or costs of specifi c projects or for prioritizing alternative safety strategies. The level of detail associated with evaluation criteria is greater than that associated with performance measures.

< Previous Table of Contents Next >
Page last modified on October 29, 2014
Safe Roads for a Safer Future - Investment in roadway safety saves lives
Federal Highway Administration | 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE | Washington, DC 20590 | 202-366-4000