U.S. Department of Transportation
Federal Highway Administration
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Washington, DC 20590
202-366-4000


Skip to content
Facebook iconYouTube iconTwitter iconFlickr iconLinkedInInstagram

Safety

FHWA Home / Safety / Pedestrian & Bicycle / Las Vegas Pedestrian Safety Project: Phase 2 Final Technical Report

Las Vegas Pedestrian Safety Project: Phase 2 Final Technical Report

< Previous Table of Content  

REFERENCES

  1. Van Houten, R., & Malenfant, J.E.L. (1992). The influence of signs prompting motorists to yield before marked crosswalks on motor vehicle-pedestrian conflicts at crosswalks with flashing amber. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 24(3), 217-225.
  2. Van Houten, R., Malenfant, J.E.L., & McCusker, D. (2001). Advance yield markings reduce motor vehicle/pedestrian conflicts at multilane crosswalks with an uncontrolled approach. Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, National Academy Press. Washington, D.C., 1773, 69-74.
  3. Van Houten, R. (1988). The effects of advance stop lines and sign prompts on pedestrian safety in a crosswalk on a multilane highway. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 21(3), 245-251.
  4. Abdulsattar, H. N., Tarawneh, M. S., McCoy, P. T., & Kachman, S. D. (1996). Effect on vehicle-pedestrian conflicts of 'turning traffic must yield to pedestrians' sign. Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, National Academy Press. Washington, D.C., 1553, 38-45.
  5. Abdulsattar, H. N., & McCoy, P T. (1999). Effects of drivers' age on the comprehension of a pedestrian right-of-way warning sign. Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, National Academy Press. Washington, D.C., 1674, 27-31.
  6. Huybers, S., Van Houten, R., & Malenfant, J.E.L. (2004). Reducing conflicts between motor vehicles and pedestrians: The separate and combined effects of pavement markings and a sign prompt. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 37(4), 445-456.
  7. Retting, R.A., Van Houten, R., Malenfant, J.E.L., Van Houten, J., & Farmer, C.M. (1996). Special signs and pavement markings improve pedestrian safety. ITE Journal, Institute of Transportation Engineers, Washington, D.C., 66(12), 28-35.
  8. Van Houten, R., Malenfant, J. E. L., Van Houten, J., & Retting, R. (1997). Using auditory pedestrian signals to reduce pedestrian and vehicle conflicts. Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, National Academy Press. Washington, D.C., 1578, 20-22.
  9. Turner, S., Fitzpatrick, K., Brewer, M., & Park, E.S. (2006). Motorist yielding to pedestrians at unsignalized intersections. Findings from a national study on improving pedestrian safety. Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, National Academy Press. Washington, D.C., 1982, 1-12.
  10. Huang, H., Zegeer, C., & Nassi, R. (2000). Effects of innovative pedestrian signs at unsignalized locations: Three treatments. Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, National Academy Press. Washington, D.C., 1705, 43-52.
  11. Hakkert, A. S., Gitelman, V., & Ben-Shabat, E. (2002). An evaluation of crosswalk warning systems: effects on pedestrian and vehicle behavior. Transportation Research Part F (5), 275-292.
  12. Nasar, J. L. (2003). Prompting drivers to stop for crossing pedestrians. Transportation Research Part F (6), 175-182.
  13. Eccles, A. K., Tao, R., & Mangum, B. C. (2004). Evaluation of pedestrian countdown signals in Montgomery County, Maryland. Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 83rd Annual Meeting CD-ROM.
  14. Botha, J. L., Zabyshny, A. A., Day, J.E., et al. (2002). Pedestrian Countdown Signals: An Experimental Evaluation Volume 1. Retrieved August 09, 2005, from http://academic.research.microsoft.com/Publication/12300039/pedestrian-countdown-signals-an-experimental-evaluation-volume-1.
  15. Farraher, B. A. B. Pedestrian countdown indication-market research and evaluation. Retrieved August 09, 2005 from http://www.dot.state.mn.us/metro/trafficeng/signals/files/ compendium.pdf.
  16. Van Houten, R., & Malenfant, J.E.L. (2001). ITS animated LED signals alert drivers to pedestrian threats. Institute of Transportation Engineers, Washington, D.C., 71(7), 42-47.
  17. Van Houten, R., Van Houten, J., Malenfant, J.E.L., & Andrus, D. (1999). Use of animated eyes so that motorists leaving an indoor parking garage look for pedestrians. Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, National Academy Press. Washington, D.C., 1674, 57-60.
  18. Carsten, O. M. J., Sherborne, D. J., & Rothengatter, J. A. (1998). Intelligent traffic signals for pedestrians: evaluation of trials in three countries. Transportation Research Part C, 6, 213-229.
  19. Retting, R., Nitzburg, M. S., Farmer, C. M., & Knoblauch, R. L. (2002). Field evaluation of two methods for restricting right turn on red to promote pedestrian safety. Institute of Transportation Engineers, 72(1), 32-36.
  20. Nitzburg, M., & Knoblauch, R. L. (2001). An evaluation of high-visibility crosswalk treatments- Clearwater, Florida (Report No. FHWA-RD-00-105). U. S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C.
  21. Huang, H. F., & Cynecki, M. J. (2000). Effects of traffic calming measures on pedestrian and motorist behavior. Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, National Academy Press. Washington, D.C., 1705, 26-31.
  22. Lalani, N. (2001). Alternative treatments for at-grade pedestrian crossings. ITE Journal, Institute of Transportation Engineers, Washington, D.C., 71(9), 36-40.
  23. Brilon W, & Blanke, H. (1993). Extensive traffic calming: results of the accident analysis in 6 model towns. UTE 1993 compendium of technical papers. Washington, D.C., Institute of Transportation Engineers, 119-23.
  24. Bergman, A.B., Gray, B., Moffat, J.M., Simpson, E.S., & Rivara, F.P. (2002). Mobilizing for pedestrian safety: an experiment in community action. Injury Prevention, 8, 264-267.
  25. Garber, N. J., & Patel, S. T. (1995). Control of vehicle speeds in temporary traffic control zones (work zones) using changeable message signs with radar. Transportation Research Record. No. 1509, 73-81.
  26. Brewer, M. A., Pesti, G., & Schneide IV, W. (2006). Improving compliance with work zone speed limits: Effectiveness of selected devices. Transportation Research Record, n 1948, 67-76.
  27. Garber, N. J., & Srinivasan, S. (1998). Influence of exposure duration on the effectiveness of changeable-message signs in controlling vehicle speeds at work zones. Transportation Research Record. N 1650, 62-70.
  28. Fontaine, M. D., & Carlson, P. J. (2001). Evaluation of speed displays and rumble strips at rural-maintenance work zones. Transportation Research Record. n 1745, 27-38.
  29. Wang, C., Dixon, K. K., & Jared, D. (2003). Evaluating speed-reduction strategies for highway work zones. Transportation Research Record. n 1824, 44-53.
  30. Oei, H. (1996). Automatic speed management in the Netherlands. Transportation Research Record. n 1560, 57-64.
  31. Simas de Oliveira, M. G., Williams, B., & Leonard, J. D. (2003). Determining traffic stream impacts of radar detectors using microscopic simulation. Journal of Transportation Engineering. Vol 129, n 1, 7-15.
  32. Brown, S.L. (1995). Effect on vehicle speeds of signs warning of police enforcement in rural areas of South Australia. Road and Transport Research, Australian Road Research Board Ltd., Victoria, Australia. Vol. 4, No. 1, 86-90.
  33. Solomon, D. Accidents on Main Rural Highways Related to Speed, Driver, and Vehicle. Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC, July 1964 (Reprinted 1974).
  34. Cirillo, J. A. (1968). Interstate System Accident Research Study II. Interim Report II, Public Roads. Vol. 35, No. 3.
  35. Research Triangle Institute, Speed and Accident. Volume II, Report No. FH-11-6965, National Highway Safety Bureau, June 1970.
  36. West, Jr., L. B. & Dunn, J. W. (1971). Accidents, Speed Deviation and Speed Limits. Traffic Engineering, Vol. 41, No. 10.
  37. Munden, J. M. (1967). The Relation between a Driver's Speed and His Accident Rate. Report LR 88, Transport and Road Research Laboratory, Crowthorne, England.
  38. Fildes, B. N., Rumbold, G., & Leening, A. (1991). Speed Behavior and Drivers' Attitude to Speeding. Report No. 16, Monash University Accident Research Centre, Victoria, Australia.
  39. Bowie, Jr., N. N. & Waltz, M. (1994). Data Analysis of the Speed-Related Crash Issue. Auto and Traffic Safety, Vol. 2.
  40. Garber, N. J. & Gadiraju, R. (1998). Speed Variance and its Influence on Accidents. AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety, Washington, D.C.
  41. Motor Vehicle Accident Reconstruction and Cause Analysis. 4th Edition. Charlottesville, VA. The Michie Company, 1994, p 663.
  42. Vehicle Speeds and the Incidence of Fatal Pedestrian Collisions prepared by the Australian Federal Office of Road Safety, Report CR 146, October 1994.
  43. Perillo, K. V. (1997). Effectiveness of Speed Trailers on Low-Speed Urban Roadways. Master’s Thesis, Texas A & M University.
  44. UK Department of Transport. Network Management Advisory Leaflet: The Use of Puffin Pedestrian Crossings. Network Management and Driver Information Division, 1993.
  45. Catchpole, J. (1996). Further Development of the Puffin Pedestrian Crossing. VicRoads, Victoria, Australia.
  46. Ekman, L., & Draskocsky, M. (1992). Trials with Microwave Detection of Vulnerable Road Users and Preliminary Empirical Model Test. University of Leeds, Institute for Transport Studies Working Paper No 336, Leeds England.
  47. Tan, C., & Zegeer, C. V (1995). European Practices and Innovations for Pedestrian Crossings. ITE Journal, Vol. 65, No. 11, 24-31.
  48. Levelt, P. B. M. (1992). Improvement of Pedestrian Safety and Comfort at Traffic Lights: Results from French, British, and Dutch Field Tests. Institute for Road Safety Research, Leidschendam, Netherlands.

 

 

< Previous Table of Content  

 

Page last modified on February 1, 2013
Safe Roads for a Safer Future - Investment in roadway safety saves lives
Federal Highway Administration | 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE | Washington, DC 20590 | 202-366-4000