U.S. Department of Transportation
Federal Highway Administration
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Washington, DC 20590
202-366-4000


Skip to content
Facebook iconYouTube iconTwitter iconFlickr iconLinkedInInstagram

Safety

FHWA Home / Safety / Roadway Departure / Pavement Friction / High Friction Surface Treatment Curve Selection and Installation Guide

High Friction Surface Treatment Curve Selection and Installation Guide May 2016

Preface

In 2013, there were approximately 5.6 million crashes reported across the nation, including 32,719 fatalities and over 2.3 million injuries.1 More than half of the 2013 fatalities were roadway departure crashes.

Often, a small subset of the total highway network is responsible for a significant percentage of certain crash types. In 2008, for example, 28 percent of fatal crashes occurred on horizontal curves, yet horizontal curves make up only 5 percent of our Nation's roadways. Compared to vehicles driving on a tangent road section, vehicles traversing horizontal curves require a greater lateral friction due to centrifugal forces.

A roadway must have an appropriate level of pavement friction to ensure that vehicles stay safely in their lane. Poor pavement conditions, especially wet pavement, have been identified as one of the major contributing factors in roadway departure (RwD) crashes. When a pavement surface is wet or polished from wear, the level of pavement friction is reduced which may lead to skidding or hydroplaning. A high friction surface treatment (HFST ) is an ideal countermeasure for such locations because it significantly increases pavement friction and helps prevent drivers from losing control on severe curves when at least one of the following conditions exist:

What is a High Friction Surface Treatment (HFST)?

"HFST's coefficient of friction lasts longer and reduces friction-related crashes better than any other pavement treatment."

— PennDOT

HFST is a safety treatment that happens to be a pavement treatment. It dramatically and immediately reduces crashes, injuries, and fatalities associated with friction demand issues. The treatment can help compensate for deficient geometric designs, such as sharp curves and/or inadequate or variable superelevations, by providing the necessary friction to maintain traction on the intended path. HFSTs can also restore pavement surface friction where traffic has polished existing pavement surface aggregates. While not a substitute for corridor repaving, HFST provides significant increases in friction for spot applications (e.g., horizontal curves, steep grades, intersection approaches).

HFST Benefits and Effectiveness

HFST effectiveness varies by location, but overall, agencies have found that HFST can improve pavement surface friction values by up to three times the existing condition, reduce needed stopping distance by 25 to 30 percent, and provide impressive crash reductions of anywhere from 45 to 100 percent. Table 1 summarizes HFST overall crash reductions for 5 States; the crash reductions are even greater for crashes during wet road conditions.

Table 1. High Friction Surface Treatment (HFST) Effectiveness by State.
State Number of Sites in Study Average Total Crash Reduction Average Wet Crash Reduction
Kentucky Unknown 73% 86%
South Carolina 6 70% 77%
Florida 11 45% 66%

Several States have found HFST to be an ideal alternative to horizontal curve realignment, saving 90 to 98 percent in project costs.2 The treatment offers many advantages over large roadway realignment projects and other pavement treatments. These advantages include:

Purpose and Organization of the HFST Curve Selection and Installation Guide

The purpose of this guide is to provide a step-by-step process for identifying potential curves for HFST implementation in order to improve horizontal curve safety and prevent friction-related crashes. The HFST Curve Selection and Installation Guide is organized as illustrated in Figure 1.

Figure 1. HFST Curve Selection and Installation Guide Chapter Organization.
Diagram depicts the contents of each chapter in this report: Chapter 1, Step 1: Identify curves for high friction surface treatment. Chapter 2, Step 2: Conduct field verification. Chapter 3, Step 3: Select aggregate and binder materials. Chapter 4, Step 4: Determine application method and develop specifications. Chapter 5, Step 5, Estimate cost and identify funding.


1 NHTSA sponsors a Speed Program Management course that is conducted by the Transportation Safety Institute. [ Return to note 1. ]

2 Interview with Darrell Chambers and Robert Peterson, California Department of Transportation, conducted on November 25, 2014. Interview with Joey Riddle and Brett Harrelson, South Carolina Department of Transportation, conducted on November 12, 2014. [ Return to note 2. ]

3 Every Day Counts 2: HFST website, available at: https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/innovation/everydaycounts/edc-2/hfst.cfm. [ Return to note 3. ]

4 Interview with Darrell Chambers and Robert Peterson, California Department of Transportation, conducted on November 25, 2014. Interview with Joey Riddle and Brett Harrelson, South Carolina Department of Transportation, conducted on November 12, 2014. [ Return to note 4. ]

5 Interview with Darrell Chambers and Robert Peterson, California Department of Transportation, conducted on November 25, 2014. [ Return to note 5. ]

< Previous Table of Contents Next >
Page last modified on December 18, 2017
Safe Roads for a Safer Future - Investment in roadway safety saves lives
Federal Highway Administration | 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE | Washington, DC 20590 | 202-366-4000