U.S. Department of Transportation
Federal Highway Administration
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Washington, DC 20590
202-366-4000
Table of Contents | Next > |
Final Report
1. Report No. |
2. Government Accession No. |
3. Recipient's Catalog No. |
||||
4. Title and Subtitle |
5. Report Date |
|||||
6. Performing Organization Code |
||||||
7. Author(s) |
8. Performing Organization Report No. |
|||||
9. Performing Organization Name And Address |
10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) |
|||||
11. Contract or Grant No. |
||||||
12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address |
13. Type of Report and Period Covered |
|||||
14. Sponsoring Agency Code |
||||||
15. Supplementary Notes |
||||||
16. Abstract |
||||||
17. Key Words |
18. Distribution Statement |
|||||
19. Security Classif. (of this report) |
20. Security Classif. (of this page) |
21. No. of Pages |
22. Price |
2.1 Literature Review
2.2 Benefits of Setting Urbanized/Nonurbanized Safety Targets
3.1 Census Urban Areas
3.2 FHWA Adjusted Urbanized Area Boundaries
3.3 Other Urban and Rural Definitions
5.0 Safety Target Setting Framework
5.1 What is Evidence-Based Target Setting?
5.2 How to Conduct Evidence-Based Target Setting
6.0 Data and Methods for Evidence-Based Urbanized and Nonurbanized Targets
6.1 Step 1: Identifying Trends
6.2 Step 1: Trend Example
6.3 Exogenous Factors
6.4 Modal Trends
6.5 Safety Culture
6.6 Step 2: Exogenous Factors Example
6.7 Countermeasure Impact Data
6.8 Step 3 Example
7.0 Technical Methods for Target Setting
7.1 Selection of Baseline Method
7.2 Projection Methods
7.3 Feasibility Assessment
Table 3.1 U.S. Census Bureau Urban Area Types Defined by Population Range 10
Table 3.2 FHWA Urban Area Types Defined by Population Range
Table 4.1 Annual Average Fatalities in Urbanized and Nonurbanized Areas 2007-2011
Table 4.2 FHWA 2000 Adjusted Urbanized Area Fatality Rates
Table 4.3 Simpson's Paradox Illustration
Table 4.4 Serious Injury Numbers for Select States
Table 4.5 Serious Injury Rates for Selected States
Table 6.1 KABCO Injury Classification
Table 6.2 KABCO/Unknown AIS Data Conversion Matrix
Table 6.3 Comparison of Injury Severity Scales (KABCO and AIS
Table 6.4 Oregon Roadway Departure Safety Implementation Plan Countermeasures (Sample)
Table 6.5 Fatalities by Crash Type in Urbanized and Nonurbanized Areas
Table 6.6 Example State Fatalities and Serious Injuries by SHSP Emphasis Area
Figure 3.1 2010 Census Urban Area Boundaries in Columbus, Ohio
Figure 3.2 Adjusted Urbanized Area Boundaries in Columbus, Ohio
Figure 4.2 Existence of Urban and Rural Targets and Crash Data Analysis in Highway Safety Plans
Figure 5.1 Target Setting Steps
Figure 5.2 Pennsylvania Roadway Fatality Trend
Figure 5.3 National Legislative History and Fatality Trends
Figure 6.1 Relationship between VMT and Fatalities by State
Figure 6.2 Sample State Total Fatality Trend
Figure 6.3 Urbanized Area Fatalities
Figure 6.4 Nonurbanized Fatality Trend
Figure 6.5 Adjusted Urbanized Areas and MPO Areas for Three Utah MPOs 38
Figure 6.6 National Fatalities per 100,000 Population Young Drivers versus Total
Figure 6.7 Sample Step 2 Consideration of Exogenous Factors – Urbanized Areas
Figure 6.8 Sample Step 2 Consideration of Exogenous factors – Nonurbanized Areas
Table of Contents | Next > |