U.S. Department of Transportation
Federal Highway Administration
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Washington, DC 20590

Skip to content
Facebook iconYouTube iconTwitter iconFlickr iconLinkedInInstagram


FHWA Home / Safety / Local and Rural Road / Training

Improving Safety on Rural Local and Tribal Roads — Safety Toolkit

< Previous Table of Contents Next >

Step 3. Select Sites for Investigation


The outcome of a network screening activity (Step 2) is either a list of high crash locations or a crash map. In an ideal situation, every identified site would be analyzed in more detail. However, due to time and resource constraints, it may not be possible to study all sites in depth. In this step, the locations identified in Step 2 (network screening) are reviewed and evaluated to determine which of them should be selected for detailed analysis (Steps 4 through 7). Selecting sites for detailed analyses will be a qualitative process and will rely on considerations like relative severity and frequency of crashes at the site, traffic volumes, stakeholder concerns, potential solutions. While not an exhaustive list at all, some reasons to select a site for more detailed analysis could be:


The number of sites selected for detailed analysis depends greatly on the staff or consultant resources available to the agency as well as the extent to which the agency can fund corrective actions. A site summary selection process example is shown in Table 4. The table displays the types of information practitioners might consider in the site selection process, i.e., background data, evaluation considerations, and the results of site evaluation and prioritization processes. Note that Location D would rank high based on network screening using crash rates, however in this hypothetical it is not selected for further investigation for two reasons: 1) the traffic volume through the intersection is extremely low; and 2) there was only one crash at this location and it was a property damage only crash. Therefore, relatively speaking, there is no significant issue at this site. This example also demonstrates how the best use for crash rates is when the sites have comparable traffic volumes and comparable roadway characteristics.


It is important to document safety analysis findings. Documentation allows others to verify the findings and to repeat the activity again in the future.

Site selection can be finalized collaboratively among staff familiar with the community, or determined by the responsible staff member. Site selection decisions should be documented by noting which sites were and were not selected as well as the reasons behind the decision. Community members or stakeholders familiar with the safety issues also can provide valuable input to the site selection process. If there is sufficient interest, a standing community traffic safety committee could be organized to provide input and advocate for traffic safety. User Guide #2 provides a detailed example of the site selection process across multiple sites.

Table 4. Example Summary of Site Selection Process
Location Total Crashes (Three-Year Period) ADT (Does not change over the three-year period) Three-Year Average Crash Rate (Crashes/MEV) Evaluation Considerations Selected? Explanation
A 8 10,000 0.73 Traffic signal being installed this summer No Signal may address current crash issues. Reevaluate after signal installation
B 6 8,000 0.68 Some of the crashes are severe, site is in downtown redevelopment district Yes Relatively high crash severity and intersection modification may be consistent with community plans
C 4 2,000 1.83 Low-severity crashes, Staff is familiar with issue, landscaping may address issue Yes If landscaping addresses issue, low-cost easy improvement
D 1 50 18.26 Low volume, PDO crash No Extremely low volume and low severity crash. Monitor to see if trends change

Return to top

< Previous Table of Contents Next >
Page last modified on October 4, 2013
Safe Roads for a Safer Future - Investment in roadway safety saves lives
Federal Highway Administration | 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE | Washington, DC 20590 | 202-366-4000